Started By
Message
Deboers Style
Posted on 1/3/26 at 5:44 pm
Posted on 1/3/26 at 5:44 pm
Can anyone explain to me who we are going after in the portal, and what scheme or style is he trying to achieve. I looked back at the 2023 offensive lineman for Washington and here is what they were listed at.
Very startling to see for our future TBH if this is who he wants.
Player Position Height Weight
Troy Fautanu LT 6 ft 4 in 295 lb
Nate Kalepo LG 6 ft 6 in 302 lb
Parker Brailsford C 6 ft 2 in 271 lb
Julius Buelow LG (also RG spot) 6 ft 8 in 303 lb
Roger Rosengarten RT 6 ft 6 in 291 lb (Washington roster) / 296 lb (pro listing)*
Very startling to see for our future TBH if this is who he wants.
Player Position Height Weight
Troy Fautanu LT 6 ft 4 in 295 lb
Nate Kalepo LG 6 ft 6 in 302 lb
Parker Brailsford C 6 ft 2 in 271 lb
Julius Buelow LG (also RG spot) 6 ft 8 in 303 lb
Roger Rosengarten RT 6 ft 6 in 291 lb (Washington roster) / 296 lb (pro listing)*
Posted on 1/3/26 at 5:50 pm to RTRnFlorida
We had massive o linemen and couldn’t block for shite. Not like the smaller guys could be worse and we’ll save money on groceries
Posted on 1/3/26 at 5:58 pm to RTRnFlorida
This is not original with me but can’t say it any better: He wants smaller, more athletic offensive linemen who can pull sideline to sideline and move in space.
Also, I asked AI to describe DeBoer and Grubb’s running game at Washington:
Kalen DeBoer's run game at Washington was effective, balancing physical "manball" with misdirection, multiple formations (like 12 personnel), and timely aggression, despite sometimes relying heavily on the pass; they used inside/outside zone, power, and counters, focusing on winning the trench battles and getting downhill quickly to support their explosive passing attack, but struggled to maintain consistency against top defenses in some crucial moments.
Key Characteristics:
Physical & Direct: At its core, DeBoer's system was built on dominating upfront, using "manball" principles to win the trench war and get backs upfield fast, not disguised but powerful runs.
Misdirection & Motion: The offense used creative shifts, motions, and formations (like 12 personnel with a tight end on the short side) to confuse defenses and create running lanes.
Variety of Runs: They mixed inside/outside zones, power, counter, and sweeps to keep defenses guessing.
Aggressive Playcalling: DeBoer showed a willingness to be aggressive on fourth downs, trusting his offense to make plays when needed.
"Fine Line" with Passing: While the run game was crucial, Washington often leaned on its prolific passing game, and sometimes struggled to establish the run consistently against elite defenses, creating a "fine line" between dominance and one-dimensionality.
Also, I asked AI to describe DeBoer and Grubb’s running game at Washington:
Kalen DeBoer's run game at Washington was effective, balancing physical "manball" with misdirection, multiple formations (like 12 personnel), and timely aggression, despite sometimes relying heavily on the pass; they used inside/outside zone, power, and counters, focusing on winning the trench battles and getting downhill quickly to support their explosive passing attack, but struggled to maintain consistency against top defenses in some crucial moments.
Key Characteristics:
Physical & Direct: At its core, DeBoer's system was built on dominating upfront, using "manball" principles to win the trench war and get backs upfield fast, not disguised but powerful runs.
Misdirection & Motion: The offense used creative shifts, motions, and formations (like 12 personnel with a tight end on the short side) to confuse defenses and create running lanes.
Variety of Runs: They mixed inside/outside zones, power, counter, and sweeps to keep defenses guessing.
Aggressive Playcalling: DeBoer showed a willingness to be aggressive on fourth downs, trusting his offense to make plays when needed.
"Fine Line" with Passing: While the run game was crucial, Washington often leaned on its prolific passing game, and sometimes struggled to establish the run consistently against elite defenses, creating a "fine line" between dominance and one-dimensionality.
This post was edited on 1/3/26 at 5:59 pm
Posted on 1/3/26 at 5:58 pm to Sandkhan
quote:
We had massive o linemen and couldn’t block for shite.
Proctor's size wasn't a positive in this scheme. He was so fat he got beat by smaller guys way too often.
Would love to see this OLine with guys who actually fit the scheme. Lot of square pegs the last two years.
Posted on 1/3/26 at 5:59 pm to InkStainedWretch
quote:
Also, I asked AI to describe DeBoer and Grubb’s running game at Washington:
I asked ChatGPT to describe their run game at Alabama and it said “dogshit”
I think AI is getting better
Posted on 1/3/26 at 6:32 pm to RTRnFlorida
Deboer's style = Picture the opposite style of Saban and you have arrived at your answer.
Posted on 1/3/26 at 9:40 pm to RTRnFlorida
I mean, they were good enough to bully around a Texas team that had their way with us...
Posted on 1/3/26 at 10:11 pm to PuertoRicanBlaze
maybe, just maybe, at least i'm hoping ckd is as fed up with these fat slow cant get to a second level block to save their lives o linemen as we are. i mean these guys had such slow feet that even on regular run of the mill run plays, the rb's were getting hit behind the line of scrimmage, smh...
Posted on 1/3/26 at 10:14 pm to Sandkhan
quote:
I asked ChatGPT to describe their run game at Alabama and it said “dogshit” I think AI is getting better
A blind squirrel still scores a few acorns when they are sitting in front of him.
Latest Alabama News
Popular
Back to top
4









