Started By
Message

re: Bama v. AU - My Perspective

Posted on 11/27/23 at 9:28 am to
Posted by hwyman108
Member since Nov 2016
2114 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 9:28 am to
This Bama team is like an island of misfit toys. But some how they make it work.

Milroe can do some of the dumbest shite a qb can do on one play and follow it up on the next play with something totally amazing.

But I wouldn’t trade him for any other qb in the country because for whatever fricked up reason this offense just gels together in some kinda unorthodox way that any other QB probably couldn’t fit in with.

It took a bizarre play to when that game, but the whole season has been bizarre to me.
This post was edited on 11/27/23 at 9:29 am
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
47368 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 9:31 am to
The funny part is that Freeze's RPO triple option is very similar to Gus's system that has given us trouble over the years.

Difference with modern football schemes now the tightly bunched receivers is that just like in the Georgia game it can confuse our defense on who to cover. But also the motion used from these formations can be used to open holes in the run game.

They really attacked us with option football right off the tackle, but removed a lot of our outside tackling help with motions before the snap.

Plus we tend to "attack" down on defense so they scripted up a lot of plays that really abused us with misdirection.

I think one run where they used the WR, was the first carry he had all season. He scored a TD. They had been saving it for that moment
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105102 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 9:34 am to
Yep - 100% agree

Freeze had an excellent plan and they executed it very well. I also think if we'd scored on the hold with Law to go up 14-0 (and certainly if we open the 2H up with a TD to go up 24-14) there is a chance they change their plan some and we hammer them.

We had 2-3 opportunities to go up multiple scores and really stress their plan. We never did.
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
47368 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 9:37 am to
Yeah the more interesting concept from the game that actually has me worried for the Georgia game is on the other side of the ball.

Auburn had no intention of pressuring Milroe before the red zone. When we were ahead and the game was comfortable, Auburn would literally drop everyone in zone and keep everything underneath wide arse open.

Milroe early in the game just checked it down and took our first downs marching down the field until we got into the red zone.

After that they moved up and played some underneath man with a spy, and asked Milroe to throw it into tight windows to get a TD.

We could not do it, ultimately ending with up a lot of FGS.

That being said a lot of those drives we could have ran the ball and forced them out of it in the red zone, but a few penalties really killed those drives. However once we got to 3rd or 6 or more in that part of the field we really struggled to move the ball forward.
Posted by FairhopeTider
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since May 2012
21849 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 9:37 am to
quote:

We had 2-3 opportunities to go up multiple scores and really stress their plan. We never did.


If we go up 14-0, we win the game by 24+ points at least. They were ready to quit and they would’ve been forced to throw more. We would’ve lit Thorne up. Not to mention getting up 14-0 prevents that JHS mojo from building.

Also kicking a FG to start the second half was really deflating. That was a win for AU.
This post was edited on 11/27/23 at 9:39 am
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105102 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 9:39 am to
quote:

Also kicking a FG to start the second half was really deflating. That was a win for AU.


Kicking that FG was the moment when I starting getting nervous about that game being a 4 quarter, last possession affair. I felt fairly confident that if we ever got the lead out to double digits we'd be in good shape - they were not in any way shutting down our offense and their offensive plan was not going to consistently churn out TDs.

But, we didn't. And then we gave up a TD. And then we missed a FG.
Posted by JIB
Member since Sep 2013
1961 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 9:40 am to
Looking back at the game they had 2 big RB runs for 56 and 42, then their next 3 best runs were by Thorne for 22, 19 and 14. Then 12 and 11 yard runs by RBs. They had 11 runs over 6 yards.
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
47368 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 9:41 am to
That being said about the defense Auburn ran. I am not sure Georgia or us would even attempt it. Because we have a "philosophy" of making them fight for every yard. Thus we would rather give up the big play then a bunch of empty yardage. But Milroe is a big play waiting to happen, so Auburn took that away.

Not sure Georgia will ask their defense to do that, as that goes against their very foundation as a defense.
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105102 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 9:42 am to
quote:

Looking back at the game they had 2 big RB runs for 56 and 42, then their next 3 best runs were by Thorne for 22, 19 and 14. Then 12 and 11 yard runs by RBs. They had 11 runs over 6 yards.


Yep - and we basically controlled their running back run game in the 2nd half. However, Thorne hurt us multiple times on QB draws.
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
47368 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 9:42 am to
quote:

And then we missed a FG.


Once we missed that one, I really got nervous lol
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105102 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 9:44 am to
quote:

Not sure Georgia will ask their defense to do that, as that goes against their very foundation as a defense.


Similar to what I was talking about earlier in the thread about our defense and "taking away the run". It's just compatible with the general Saban/Smart philosophy of defense.
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
47368 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 9:47 am to
quote:

Similar to what I was talking about earlier in the thread about our defense and "taking away the run". It's just compatible with the general Saban/Smart philosophy of defense.


Agreed we never really "sold out" and brought everyone up to stop the run until very late in the game or in the red zone.

We always feel like we have the "guys" that can shut them down without committing help. TBH they are usually correct. If we dont miss the FG and convert more TDs then yeah we win. The defense did slow them down quite a bit even if it does not feel like it.
Posted by Bear88
Member since Oct 2014
14351 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 10:02 am to
Basically midline option out of the gun and forced us to play assignments and we played slow most of the day. They mixed in some power schemes for the QB runs as well. Good game plan
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105102 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Basically midline option out of the gun and forced us to play assignments and we played slow most of the day. They mixed in some power schemes for the QB runs as well. Good game plan


Posted by Bear88
Member since Oct 2014
14351 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 10:31 am to
I hate facing Freeze… not going to lie. Gave us fits at OM too
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter