Poll: Are You In Favor Of LSU Adding Players With NFL Experience To The Roster?

Nathan Ray Seebeck-Imagn Images
LSU's push to add players with NFL experience to its roster will come to a head on Thursday. That is when a court hearing is set in Baton Rouge, where the SEC and commissioner Greg Sankey will challenge a temporary restraining order (TRO) that is currently preventing the conference from enforcing its new rule against players who have signed professional contracts.

The timing is important for LSU. The Tigers have until Friday to finalize their 105-man roster, one day before they open the season against Clemson.

Former Ole Miss tight end Dae'Quan Wright, who spent this summer in NFL training camps with the Philadelphia Eagles and Cleveland Browns but never made a regular-season roster, has practiced with LSU over the past week.

Here is your chance to tell the world how you feel about this:

Are you in favor of LSU adding players with NFL experience to the roster?
Originally published on TigerDroppings.com
36 Comments
user avatar
user avatar
Cwils222216 hours
Need you to be more specific with the question.

You mean right now while it’s legal and everybody else has the opportunity to do it? (Yes)

Or the idea of it in principle? (No)
user avatar
Petroleum Adam16 hours
This is the right answer. I don’t think players who have signed with NFL teams should be able to return to college.

But if they are able, they should come to LSU.
user avatar
Bayoubengal2056 hours
This is the key to me.
The question worded to say “with NFL experience” HARDLY describes the two players we are trying to sign on.
user avatar
Sailor Sam16 hours
You need to reword the question. Participating in an NFL training camp doesn't mean you have NFL experience. It's nothing more than a tryout.
user avatar
Chicken16 hours
All that matters is what the SEC deems as "NFL experience"...
user avatar
JackieSonnier16 hours
So mr chicken what do you think? Should kiffin see this through till the end?
user avatar
TexHoss16 hours
Undrafted 2022 players: yes. Everyone else: no.
user avatar
NotaStarGazer16 hours
I like some others did not like the wording of the ?. IMO, the proper question should have been..."Are you in favor of LSU adding players from the 2022 class due to them not being informed about their options related to 5 for 5?" NFL experience implies including veteran players.
user avatar
I wish there were an option for: dom't care. Spot the ball.
user avatar
pitchandcatch2715 hours
Pass. Move on. Why flirt with disaster? Game week and these distractions before an opening game is not a good thing.
user avatar
Javi00714 hours
Let's only allow amateurs to play and we can all gather on Saturdays to watch the marching band, or are they being paid to play too?
user avatar
Geaux Guy2 hours
Updating my resume…. I never knew I was an ex MLB player with MLB experience. Did a tryout with the Detroit Tigers back in 1990.
user avatar
Davy16 hours
They don't know the playbook or the team, they won't contribute for months, and it's their final year of eligibility. It's simply not worth the risk.
user avatar
Beaux22515 hours
That depends on the case right? A tight end like Wright would know kiffin and Weiss playbook, and an end like Pyburn would know bakers playbook, to an extent.
user avatar
Higgysmalls3 hours
We talking about 2 players and this is a one time issue. People are stupid. People act like every year this is going to be a problem
user avatar
SOL27 hours
I'm not in favor of adding NFL players that are actually on a 53 man NFL roster.
But, I am ok with adding the 5th year players that never made a roster or practice squad. Just because you tried out for an NFL team does not make you an NFL player, IMO. Thousands do this and never suit up on Sundays. But , no, Burrow and Jefferson don't get to come back. However , Wright does because he is in BR right now and not on a 53 man roster. Calling Wright an NFL player is a stretch. He's really not that good and is only a depth piece for the Tigers, maybe 3rd team.
user avatar
LaweezyTiger14 hours
Yes! If Texas and others can do it then yes. Only under this year 5 for 5 rule. No reason we shouldn't when Chambliss is Ineligible under the 5 for 5 with his 6th year. All these teams doing it so we should be able to do it also.
user avatar
Barbellthor16 hours
I am in favor of consistency in the rules that LSU is not singularly lambasted for doing just the same as other schools, and for an exception to be made for the class of '22, and fpr a consistent rule to be applied thereafter but not just because mean old LSU did it.
user avatar
Pig 228 min
None of the players are NFL players! They did not get drafted they tried out for a team but did not make 53 man roster!! The NCAA dropped the ball on them in the 5 for 5. These players should have been given the option to play the 5th year eligibility or choose nfl. If they did that we wouldn’t be having the discussion
user avatar
Spankum2 hours
It really doesn’t matter….either everyone gets to do it or no one gets to do it so there is no competitive advantage. Seems like an unnecessary distraction at this point.
user avatar
TwoDatBait4 hours
This year should be the only exception, as the eligibility rules were changed after these players went to the draft. They would have stayed had they known they would have another year.
user avatar
lsucoonass4 hours
Sure why not! Everyone gets to do it
user avatar
BigDaddy51514 hours
It is lost on me how badly LSU is framing up this issue. We should be saying clearly and loudly "these kids did not play in the NFL they pursued it only." There is large difference between pursuing
and achieving.

Hell when I was young I pursued Pamela Anderson or thought about it...
user avatar
Bucky_B6 hours
The media has blown this all out of proportion. It's not those 22 kids' fault that the dysfunctional NCAA couldn't get their shite together and announce that these kids had a 5th year BEFORE the NFL contract deadline. But the media doesn't say anything about that nor about this being only about the class of 22. That's why I cannot stand the media these days. #fakenews
user avatar
Shawn776 hours
If the court allows it, then yes. This whole mess was created by the NCAA with repeated ambiguous decisions about player’s eligibility. These players, who did not make an NFL roster, are no more professional players than the NIL millionaires playing college football today. Let’s face it, college football is now a minor league for the NFL. It’s now become ‘Who can pay for the best team’. Pathetic.
Popular Stories
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter