Favorite team:Alabama 
Location:Alabama
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1105
Registered on:1/3/2006
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
But everybody WANTED the CFP so Bama wouldn't get in. Go to 8 or 16 and Bama is GUARANTEED to get in almost every single time. The talent gap is not nearly as wide as many think either. What are other schools doing to develop that talent? Most of the top 8 SEC teams have PLENTY of talent on their rosters to compete. When Bama started this initial push in 2008, and went 12-0 before the SEC Championship game, LSU, Auburn, Tennessee, and several others had MORE talent on their rosters. That is coaching, development, and a little bit of injury luck.
I have read quite a few whinefests today about why the CFP doesn't work, why new rules should be enforced, etc... "We have Bama/Clemson fatigue!"

Stop bitching when you got what you asked for. Also, changing things isn't going to change the outcome. You are still going to get mostly Southern teams from Southern states winning the championship. Even if Alabama and Clemson decide to shut down their programs after Monday night, they will simply be replaced by other Southern teams. Here's why:

1. Football is a cultural thing here. You can call it what you want, but it is what it is. Most Southern boys don't grow up dreaming of playing for the NHL,or being the best soccer player, or winning that championship in badminton. They want to play football.

Southern people embraced college football almost 100 years ago. And those perennial powers like Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Penn, and every other team that were considered great knew they were essentially screwed. They started their own little league and bowed out of real football.

Southern schools MAKE money on football. Money that provides all those neat stadiums, workout facilities, practice facilities, rec rooms, training staffs, dietitians, and other goodies. Oh, and they also put money back into the general funds and provide money for regular student scholarships. Your NHL ticket didn't do that, our sold out stadiums did.

We love college football, and we support it. We teach it to our children. Many Southern states don't really have professional sports, so we support collegiate athletics.

2. You can reduce scholarships again, but you are still not going to out recruit most Southern teams. You are just going to cause fewer underprivileged kids a chance to go to college. There are around 130 FBS teams. Only about 10 or 12 of those are going to attract 4 and 5 star recruits on a consistent basis.

3. A playoff was created because YOU believed that the SEC was just some hype machine. Your teams were as good, they were just being left out. After being consistently skull dragged (with the exception of Ohio State), you think sacrificing more of your poorly recruited, badly coached, unsupported, and rarely-skilled teams to Alabama, Clemson, Georgia, etc... will make a difference? Let's face it, the CFP bitching PROVES you don't actually want the best teams to play. You want your team to be there, whether they are good enough or not. Hell, I am with you to a certain extent. I would love to watch a bunch of guys with the SEC patch on their shoulder teabag your champions an extra time every year.

4. All things come to an end. Alabama will eventually lose again. Who knows how long this can last? I am riding every glorious moment. I was born in 1970, and I have lived through ups and downs with my favorite team. When Bama finally declines, your team might have a similar run. Nebraska had a run. Oklahoma, USC, Florida State, Miami, Florida, the names go on and on. The worm will turn eventually. Don't try and turn NCAA football into the NFL so you can "feel" better.

re: Are dinosaurs real or fake?

Posted by Bamapossum on 12/12/18 at 3:52 pm
How old is that GIF? This guy has grandchildren by now doesn't he?

re: Bye bye 4 team “playoff” :

Posted by Bamapossum on 12/12/18 at 3:45 pm
I wish we could have one year of UCF playing a P5 schedule. Almost every SEC or ACC team would run the train on them like a roofied chick at the ATO house. Heck, Arkansas might even get some sloppy sixths or sevenths.
Being a Jacksonville State University alumnus, I can add a little bit of insight.

Favorite cheerleader cheer from the late 80's-early 90's-
"Our Cocks- Are up- And Coming!"

When a punt or kick was blocked, the crowd screamed, "Cock block!"

Nowadays, everything like that has been nipped in the bud. They do that little rooster head symbol with fingers now and scream, "Fear the beak!"
Sorry, but that logic doesn't work. These are the longest NCAA seasons that have ever existed. I do not expect Alabama to lose, but if they did and didn't get in, the conference championship games need to be shite-canned.

Alabama VS UGA is not equal to the other one-sided conference championship games, or even not belonging to a conference. Anybody can lose a game if chaos ensues.

Making "winning your conference" a requirement for the CFP completely undoes its purpose for existence. It would penalize teams for being in a strong conference and playing a conference schedule. I would be in favor of going independent. Who is Notre Dame playing next Saturday? Should they get in without winning a conference championship?

re: Just a stats observation

Posted by Bamapossum on 10/21/18 at 9:13 pm
Just a little...

re: Serious question for the Gumps.

Posted by Bamapossum on 10/21/18 at 9:12 pm
There will be down time, and there will be up times again. Alabama has been playing winning football for a very long time. What we are seeing now is unprecedented, but Alabama has never been a weak team unless they had a bad coach or sanctions.

Just a stats observation

Posted by Bamapossum on 10/21/18 at 9:08 pm
Here is why I don't like to rely on stats very much when dealing with very good or very bad teams: they don't reflect real game time.

The truth is, Alabama has not had to play more than two or three quarters of football this year. A lot of offensive stats have been with 2nd-5th string players. Many of the points scored against Alabama have been late game junk while Bama was showing mercy on offense and using some back ups on defense.

You can say Alabama hasn't played anyone all you want to. The fact is, they have eviscerated everyone so badly and so early, that we haven't got a clue just how much damage they are truly capable of inflicting. All of the team records they are breaking is happening in a half to 3 quarters of football. If Saban was the kind of man to run up scores, it would be gruesome.
Obviously he has to be on the take as well. The only way for this horrible conspiracy to take place is for the complicit actions of White. After all, it wasn't just any player. He waited until nearly the end of the game, then did as he was instructed.

I would definitely check his garage for any new Dodge Chargers. :rotflmao:
This thread reminds me of the old, "So other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you enjoy the play?"
Okay, here is why this is a dangerous abnormality:

1. Insane parents are pushing and prodding children to assume gender bending dynamics at unbelievably young ages. Some as young 3 or 4. Children that age shouldn't even know what a gender is. Ever read or watch I am Jazz?

2. To deny that this is a mental illness defies logic. It sets many of these "confused" people up for serious medical problems and mental problems indefinitely. If I walk into a doctor's office and say I want to remove my healthy foot because I feel like it needs amputating. They will refuse and make sure I receive mental health counseling. If I want to have a healthy penis or breasts removed, they will send me be mentally evaluated so they can begin the process. I will be given hormone treatments and coaxed into my "lifestyle".

3. Women's sports are going to suffer greatly. Even with hormone replacements, a man is bigger, stronger, and faster. A woman who is taking make hormones is bigger, stronger, and faster. Real women are already losing events to "female" competitors.

4. Women and men have thousands of biological differences. Plugging in some hormones and putting on a costume does not actually change the biology.

5. When this behavior is endorsed and supported by media, universities, and other organizations, it is a clear nod to moral relativity that will continue to erode the foundations of common sense and normal society. These people are sick, literally. They are mentally ill and should be treated as such.
Second man on the list

This is a very good friend of mine, and super nice man, Gary Carlyle.

He played fullback at Alabama A&M during the early 1970's. He later went on to be a coach and principal before retiring a few years ago.

Some interesting facts:

He is a member of the Alabama A&M Sports Hall of Fame.

He was once placed on the watch list for a national atheist organization for refusing to stop prayer at his school (He called it one of the proudest moments of his life).

He kept a picture of his college coach next to a picture of Robert E. Lee in his office.

He is a Civil War reenactor.

He is the former commander of the Alabama Sons of Confederate Veterans.

His stories about going to school and playing at A&M are nothing but positive, and this was during the early days of integration. I imagine his experiences were good because he is an extremely likable person who treats everyone with respect. He is also pretty darn big even in his 60's.
IMO, the true level of commitment and love required to fuel a happy marriage is simply not conducive to open marriage. Once one, or both, begin to have extramarital affairs, the insecurity and destabilization begins. No matter how "open-minded" these people are, they are human.

My wife and I have been together for 24 years, married for nearly 22. I know that we have both been faithful to each other, and that makes a big difference. If I found out tomorrow that she had sex with another man, it would effectively be over. I would expect her reaction to be the same if I had sex with another woman. We are not selfish, we are loyal to each other and our vows, because we are still in love after all this time.

I am not only committed to my wife and children, I am committed to the idea of having a healthy, loving family and a healthy marriage. My grandparents had these kinds of marriages. I didn't learn it from my parents' generation.

re: New state model for education

Posted by Bamapossum on 5/20/18 at 9:05 pm
Wrong wrong wrong wrong!

I know better than to believe that I would get more money. Schools simply cannot and will not make a profit. I am a tried and true capitalist, but schools do not create a product the way a factory or store does, and the profits will not be seen for years. That $10,000 you speak of must go to fund the physical plant, technology, etc... An area as small as where I live cannot sustain enough schools to make competition viable. I am assuming one way you would cut costs would be to remove transportation. In that case, many students don't have the means to get to a competitive location. Bureaucracy is bad, but a horrible business model is just as bad or worse. What most private schools do in areas with vouchers is simply do away with transportation and special education in order to create profit (which is still minimal). Their teachers aren't getting paid better by and large.

re: New state model for education

Posted by Bamapossum on 5/20/18 at 6:02 pm
There are a lot of simply bad ideas here from multiple sides. Yes, I am a teacher. No, I am not in a union. I am about as conservative as one kind find.

1. School choice is a lie, and thinking vouchers will open new ones is a bigger lie. Why? Schools are not profitable. Never have been. Never will be. Aren't vouchers just another approach to Pell Grants and student loans? Most areas are simply too rural to offer school choice.

2. Comparing US test scores to foreign scores is comparing apples to custom grown square watermelons. We teach and test EVERYBODY who goes to school in this country, AND we send EVERYBODY to school. Only the best and brightest even get to go to school in many countries. While little Johnny Merican with a 78 IQ and his many similar friends are attempting to take the ACT (I am not shitting you), little Kim Wong with a 78 IQ is working in a lithium mine, sewing Nikes, or making Iphones.

3. The mass majority of Americans, regardless of their race or gender, are more concerned with the distance of the school from their workplace, the sports possibilities, or how "prestigious" the school appears, rather than actual results.

It's much more complicated than most people understand. Even I have a hard time pointing to many viable solutions. The students are a genetic and social product of their environments, and the schools are generally a reflection. Mountain Brook High School will be the best high school in Alabama for a long time, because 84% of the adult population has at least a bachelor's degree. The schools in impoverished areas, with broken homes, and adult illiteracy will never succeed beyond a certain point. The culture is toxic.
I will preface this by letting everyone know that I am a teacher with 18 years of experience. I teach HS English and 101 and 102 at a community college.

There seems to be a general idea that teachers are primarily progressive and are attempting to indoctrinate children into Marxist and Socialist ideologies. In my experience, most teachers are representative of their local communities. I live in a rural area of Alabama where most people are clearly conservative; therefore, most of the teachers I know are conservative. There are a couple of progressive types at my school, but they are very low-key and not outspoken at all. I have not witnessed any teacher attempting to indoctrinate pupils, although I have questioned curriculum choices.

Many of my colleagues and I are fully capable of safely maintaining and using firearms. While many teachers would not be comfortable possessing firearms in school, there are enough willing, intelligent, and resourceful teachers who would gladly use them to protect our workplaces. I am NRA certified and have shot competitively. I probably have more hours of range time than the average police officer. I would not want to open carry or concealed carry while teaching, but have a handgun or AR-15 locked up within easy reach while in my classroom. I would provide my own weapon and submit to any required training to have the right to protect the students and myself.

The primary stronghold of progressive thought is at the collegiate level, and even that is moderate depending on the college or university. I can assure you, children are far more susceptible to indoctrination by parents and peers than they are to being indoctrinated by educators.
Upset? Not hardly. It's just fun and games.


I wonder if they are all the same, or if they get a choice of flavors?