novabill

quote:

---

Why does this retard have to voice an opinion on everything?

---

Ya know, the same could be asked if you.

Just sayin

quote:

---

If you can't recognize what these people are going has gone far beyond "questioning ICE" or peacefully protesting, then you're intellectually dishonest and not worth trying to reason with.

---

I get it and agree in the big picture.
However I am looking at this instance.

These people would live to see every ICE agent dead on the street. They hate ICE. But that is not relevant to this topic.

This lady was not approached by the ICE agent because the crowds there hate ICE, was she? He went to her to shove her down. I'm just curious why. Was she somehow interfering from her side of the street?

quote:

---

They are not protesters. They cease being that when they follow ICE and begin obstructing agents. At that point everyone there is committing a federal felony and they need to start treating them like that.

---

Standing on sidewalk?

Pushing them down or arresting them?

This is not a condemnation of the shooting. The guy resisted while he had a gun, anyone doing that job in that moment would have reason to fear for their life.

Clearly the protestors and agitators do not want ICE doing their job, arresting people in the country illegally.

I do support them in their mission, however that is not to say everything they do is right and that there are no bad apples.

So, why the aggression here that led to the attempted arrest and shooting? Was there an active operation going on on that side of the street that was being interfere with? If so, why not arrest her instead of shoving her down?

Can law enforcement do their job without undue violence? Arresting those that interfere with appropriate force to safely apprehend the offenders?

It is possible to support law enforcement doing there job while also wanting them to be held to certain standard of conduct .

quote:

---

'm open to the discussion here

But the idea that businesses should just bend their business models in earth-shattering ways to meet the rhetoric of the President is a tad ridiculous

---

3x Trump voter here and I agree with you.

quote:

---

hawkeye007 who claimed to be a mortgage 'expert' with 21 years of experience called it QE, which it isn't, and also said 'rates are not going down anytime soon'

---

I can vouch for his experience; he and I worked together way back when.

I did not see the post but $200B is not that much compared to QE numbers . There were trillions spent QE, this $200B is not really much by comparison and I do not think this will move rates much.

quote:

---

What is deemed tampering
BiggaGeauxrilla
Not saying it doesn’t happen but you would have to be an idiot to actually get caught tampering “directly” with a player now days. The system is setup to be able to easily make contact with their representation. This tampering bs all started with Ole Miss and their threats against LSU because of the coaches being there physically and has taken on a whole new meaning on social media. It’s not an actual enforceable thing or rule how the system is structured currently.

---

Can you argue tampering, when are literally paying the coach to have contact with that player.

The coaches in question may be LSU employees but aren't Ole Miss also?

I just don't see a tampering charge against any coach talking to players they still coaching.

quote:

---

Maybe more people will quit buying things they can’t afford

---

Due to lower rates?

quote:

---

don't forget Biden and his administration declared half of Americans extremists and terrorists as well as threatened us with the use of US military on us.

This announcement by Noem is not where the definition was changed. This is just the Trump admin using the 'new rules' of the left against the left.

Shoe is now on the other foot.

---

I don't disagree.
But I still don't like it.

Criminal yes, terrorist no

quote:

---

Yes. Trying to kill NAZIS. These people think our government is kidnapping citizens and disappearing them. You really think those types of people are incapable of rationalizing murdering those doing the disappearing?

---

I am not looking at the big picture at all. I am not considering "these" people. I am looking at one instance where I do not see someone trying to run over someone else. I see someone not obeying the police and trying to escape, not trying to run over someone who stepped in front of and then to the side of the vehicle.

My view of the big picture, which I think you and I agree on, does not color my view of any individual situation.

Trying to kill?

Come on