Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:107
Registered on:12/22/2025
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Texas judge Martin Hoffman -

Posted by Goldingera on 8/28/26 at 10:20 am to
quote:

If he's that bad, how was he put in this position in TX?


Windle turley gave him several million dollars to run for judge because he was such an irritating taint to work with

I’ve also heard from several sources SMU does not send him the resume of female students for…reasons
quote:

Speaking from experience, huh?


I don’t think I’ve ever said a nice word about the autistic man child
quote:

He sure got y'all stirred up for a few days.


Sidewalk, I think Lane left a bit on your chin
quote:

But he definitely won’t play for Ole Miss. And that is the point of LSU signing him.


You sound scared
Only Blake baker’s defense would forget to cover HALF the field on 4th and 3
Pretty good tight end. Slower than you’d expect and makes some retarded mistakes, like not going out of bounds with 6 seconds left in the half and no timeouts
quote:

Dottery and weeks may be the best lb duo in the country. We will be OK.


Oh frick are you going to be disappointed in that fig Dudley

re: 2026 Fall Camp Thread

Posted by Goldingera on 8/19/26 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

Also, couldn’t the NCAA just say “nope. Portal isn’t open”. What’s the judge going to do?


Lol
Sidewalk, I don’t say this to be mean, I really think you need to check into an institution after that post.
quote:

it’s absolutely not private equity


My new business idea isn’t a pyramid scheme, it’s multi level marketing
quote:

I dont think it can be.


You are correct. Ole Miss is not a citizen of MS for the purpose of diversity jurisdiction
quote:

Horse racing is a totally different thing than college sports. Legislated and regulated in a totally different way. There is zero correlation. The HISA created a body that was in essence a government body that could do things like issue subpoenas. The NCAA does not become a body like that due to this legislation. You really need to read the opinion.


I’ve read the opinion several times. I don’t really know where your disconnect is. Do you think Congress is granting the NCAA authority to make rules regarding eligibility, portal etc but not investigate or adjudicate those issues?

quote:

The NFL, NBA, MLB, etc. all do this in their respective sports.


Per a CBA not a grant of congressional authority
quote:

They never once said the bill's provisions was unconstitutional. The issue they had was with their belief that Congress cannot give a private entity (the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority) the regulatory and enforcement powers of the United States government.


Which would make it unconstitutional lol

quote:

However, the Supreme Court has signaled that the Fifth Circuit is wrong in this opinion.


Even if SCOTUS decides the 5th circuit is wrong…until then the most recent HISA opinion is the law in the 5th circuit lol
quote:

From who? And on what grounds?


From athletes. And on constitutional grounds.

Obviously we haven’t seen the final language of the bill but Congress borrowed a ton of language from a similar horse racing bill from around 2021. Since that passed the 5th circuit has struck it down 3-4 times

Due process, congressional delegation, and one more thing that won’t come to mind right now that would be applicable to this bill as well

Edit: 5th circuit found HISA unconstitutional the most recent time because Congress delegated legislative, adjudicative and enforcement powers to a private entity.

Essentially the same shite they’d do with this bill. Either the ncaa can make rules, can enforce rules, or can adjudicate matters but they can’t do all three
quote:

probably? It's not even close. Kiffin had the #1 offense in the SEC in 4 of his 6 seasons at Old Piss, while never being outside of the Top 3. It's Kiffin at #1 and then a huge gap between #2.


2024 team had a first round qb, solid Oline, first round talent at wr. Lane put up 30+ on one SEC team btw

re: Lane is about make OM pay

Posted by Goldingera on 7/30/26 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

For example, if you and I contract that you to peform work for $100. You tell me you decided not to do it, and I didn't pay you yet. I hire someone else to do it for $150. If I sue you, then I could collect $50, not $150.


That’s why I mentioned the “cap” implications. Even if ole Miss didn’t pay the players, I believe it counted the same for cap purposes. So in this instance you’d still “spend” the first 100 dollars

I also was saying 500k in excess of the signed players. Obviously no one except players and staff actually know what the numbers are but I wouldn’t be shocked to hear a late window portal player is 500k+ more than retaining a guy of similar skill

re: Lane is about make OM pay

Posted by Goldingera on 7/30/26 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

don't doubt it was a legal contract, and I could be entirely wrong, but I don't see a court siding with OM here. I think a half million dollar penalty for breach of contract just 10 days into it while the portal was still open and no payments were made at all will be deemed excessive.


Another unique thing about LD clauses is they’re analyzed at the time of formation not the time of breach. Ole Miss just has to prove they were reasonable or rationally based on anticipated damages at the time the contract was made.

Pretty easy to get to 500k or so for a new defensive end when the only eligible portal players are coming from playoff teams in the extended portal window

quote:

can't imagine any employer giving a contract to someone and then asking them to pay the company half a million dollars if they leave in the first 3 months(without any payments too).


Remind me, what was CWJ’s buyout if he left LSU prior to March?

re: Lane is about make OM pay

Posted by Goldingera on 7/30/26 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

What were the liquidated damages associated with the contract? Something like Ole Miss having a loss of revenue due to the athletes withdrawing from contracts or something? Did Ole Miss incur more costs due to them leaving?


My understanding is the NCAA bylaws count the money promised to them in the rev share deal against the “cap” regardless. The damages are a couple of things.

1. Having their pay count against the cap without them playing


2. Having to replace them with a portal that was either closed or closing

3. Loss of opportunity type damages, like anyone we could have brought in we chose not to

re: Lane is about make OM pay

Posted by Goldingera on 7/30/26 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

There are no allegations that any payments were made to Umanmielen.


We’ve been trying to tell you Baws it doesn’t matter if there was payment made or not. It’s a liquidated damages clause dispute not a “pay me back” dispute
quote:

Take it easy on ManBear, the Rebel board was basically telling him to STFU on the Rant the other day because he's embarrassing them, and now he's in his feelings.


Well if it ain’t sidewalk stalking the Rebs board. I’m shocked I tell you, shocked

re: Lane is about make OM pay

Posted by Goldingera on 7/29/26 at 7:19 am to
quote:

for suing players for $1 million because they didn’t wanna go play there and that’s it?


For breaching a contract they’d just signed*

Dude, stop being a retard