Dave1999

I’d take a serious look at Sark. Not only would his hire improve the offense and recruiting, it might be the tipping point in getting Saban to retire. Does Saban really want to rebuild another staff at his age when he could go out on top.

Matt Luke isn’t so far fetched . He is from the coast
and could recruit to their level. The program has been a mess since Bowers.

Louisiana has better cuisine, Florida has greater
variety. Alabama just fries everything and forget
seasoning. Mississippi comes in a respectable
third. Also, catfish isn’t seafood. It’s good eating
but it’s not seafood.

Just saw where it is junior colleges. Hopefully
it isn’t implemented at all levels.

I assumed it was just a ploy by his agent to bump
up his contract but he would make sense. Young
coach with credentials. Not sure of the salary or buyout needed but he would fit culturally.

Only half jokin. He seems like he would recruit a little
better and fit there identity until they were ready to move on. We

Would not Nike and Adidas basically buy the image rights of the top prospects
and direct them to their schools ? Quite honestly I can see this leading to more
players going pro sooner. Will the average fan still feel the attachment for his team
if the players are seen as semi pros ?

LINK

So who is the biggest loser ? The NCAA ? The athletes? How about the NFL who may
have to fund a developmental league ?Professional minor league football has never
survived. Even college football relies on taxpayer subsidies to exist . Will fans feel an
attachment to a hybrid college/pro team when the student athletes are just paid athletes
like minor league baseball players ?

The obvious thing is that the richer schools will get richer and every other school will
have to decide if they want to and can afford to compete. If a recruit has a choice between UCLA , where he could earn more money, why would he go to South Carolina
where the earnings would be less ?