scleeb

Role Tide, Bamafrick.

I believe this professor is exactly who most believe he is. I believe his method is counterproductive. He is attempting to provoke thought but, he is doing more to provoke anger. He is challenging ideas that are very long held by people very invested in them.

Still, this does not mean he is totally wrong or, totally correct.

Ultimately, I think the real debate lies in a "might makes right world" versus a "right makes might" world. Can economic might be as violent as pure brute force?

Ultimately, democracy, freedom, capitalism can only thrive in one environment.

If you believe the answers are simple, you are at best naive, at worst a useful idiot. If you believe skin color has anything to do with statistics, you are a racist.

Society is led from the top, not the bottom. Blaming the powerless is simply the cover some of the powerful have contrived in order to manipulate those too lazy, or unable, to think.

"I find it hard to believe that Auburn fans, home of the Mises Institute (Libertarian think tank), are for the authoritarian crackdown that Alabama has implemented."

LOL! Von Mises was a clown. Almost all economic thought has some value since, there are no perfect systems and, we live in a very dynamic world. Von Mises believed to his dying day that he was the only one who knew how to run an economy.

The original question was the economy or, human lives. When the inhumanity and hypocrisy were criticized, the narrative becomes, "civil liberties". Civil liberties? You have the right to endanger your fellow man? IMHO, neither is genuine. The real balancing is human lives versus the tenuous nature of the credit markets. A developed, truly healthy capitalistic economy would/should be much more resilient. An economy that has become so dependent upon credit cannot afford the potential mass defaults. Fundamental economics is dead. On the macro scale, it is all about capital and finance.

"I’m not mad at all. Just because you disagree with me doesn’t make my IQ low or me dumb in any way. Seems you can’t take a differing opinion other then your own which makes you appear to be a little childish. We were discussing the shelter in place order which is a government order and what is politics? So we were all discussing politics. So take your bitchy little remarks wherever about me because you don’t know me and I don’t really care what you think of my opinions. So stay in your your safe space and I’ll stay doing my thing and we will both be happy. Good luck to you. But drop the personal attacks!!!"

Theys mad cause your write. This hear things just a nother libral hokes. Role Tide an MAGA

Questions (no math required):

1. Have we found the other serviceable player we will need later when Okoro comes back?

2. Is RPI meaningless in basketball rankings/seedings?

The problem is not the backs, not the OL linemen. The problem is a blocking scheme that has not changed. There are only a few NFL linemen who can make the trap blocks we are asking our linemen to make. Consequently, our "power" run game doesn't consistently get runners out of the backfield. Forget getting to the second level. The read option is still viable but, you can no longer count on disciplined defenses running themselves out of position.

I wish Steele would explain to Gus, how a good defensive coordinator with decent talent will stop Gus's offense. All of the pulls and traps are meaningless (if not detrimental) when the defenders maintain gap integrity. And,without a running game, our passing attack is just too predictable and inconsistent. Against better teams, we aren't fooling anyone, anymore. Sometimes you just have to straight up block the guy in front of you. Keep the motion, get rid of some unnecessary, unproductive line pulls and traps.

Rather hire Joe Brady as our head coach, leave defensive staff in place.

"When the non-contending years are 7-6 and 8-5 type years, yes."


If you win more than 8, you are most likely contending.