Started By
Message
Posted on 12/28/21 at 3:23 pm to GoldenDawg
quote:
has done nothing to lose the job.
That’s it, and it’s amaZing how so many can’t Grasp that reality.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 3:29 pm to SquatchDawg
quote:
There’s more drama on this board than a cosmetology school.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 3:30 pm to Buzz Killington
quote:
Don't you think it's a problem that we don't want our QB to throw it more than 20 times?
We do alright when he throws it 20 or so times a game.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 4:01 pm to Rex Feral
It’s amazing how far that point went over your head
Posted on 12/28/21 at 4:28 pm to Lucius Clay
quote:
In the meantime, they better win the next two with Bennett...no choice, given some of their statements.
Or?
In your opinion you can't start the QB that gives you the best chance to win and still lose?
Posted on 12/28/21 at 4:31 pm to djsdawg
quote:
It’s amazing how far that point went over your head
Kind of like Stet's passes.
Am I doing it right?
Posted on 12/28/21 at 6:29 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Nope, doing it wrong
Story of my life.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 6:44 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
In your opinion you can't start the QB that gives you the best chance to win and still lose?
Not when you aren't coming clean. As noted, Monken refused in the presser to answer when asked about a couple of situations when Daniels could have had an opportunity to regain his job...or even to help out in a game when Bennett wasn't doing well.
The narrative that Bennett suddenly got so good after taking over for injured Daniels...and somehow Daniels could just never do anything to have a chance to play again...(even though he was a starter previously)...I mean, get real. That story might have legs if Bennett was a freshman sensation who was rapidly emerging as a superstar but otherwise...nah. Something reeks.
What's clear is that Smart wasn't going to play Daniels again under any circumstance.
It's moot now because they've so rarely played Daniels or given him significant time with the #1 offense over the last two months. So his ability to effectively step into a playoff game now is...who knows?
But with Bennett losing the fan vote by 7 to 1 now, Smart needs to be coaching his arse off and praying to the patron saint of football that he wins these next two games. If he doesn't, he is going to look even worse.
I'm going to be interested to hear what Daniels and/or his family has to say after this season.
This post was edited on 12/28/21 at 6:49 pm
Posted on 12/28/21 at 7:31 pm to Lucius Clay
It’s pretty clear that Kirby favors Stetson for some reason and it’s not Bc of his play at QB. It took 2 @$$ whoopings last year for Kirby to finally make a change and it was very clear in practices last year who the better QB was. Kirby didn’t have a problem putting Stetson in against South Carolina for one play to throw that interception, just like Fields never received a fair chance neither has JT. Kirby has to change if he actually wants to beat Saban, we can’t keep having these games of barely scoring 21 points against them and expect to win.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 7:53 pm to Bradb5291
quote:
It’s pretty clear that Kirby favors Stetson for some reason and it’s not Bc of his play at QB
So Kirby and now Monken are telling you straight out that they believe Stetson gives us our best chance to win but you think they’re lying because it doesn’t fit with this imaginary world you live in?
The one where JT is the second coming of Joe Burrow and the coaches hold him back because they don’t want to win?
Posted on 12/28/21 at 8:49 pm to SquatchDawg
The only Imaginary world I see is all these fans thinking Bennett is the guy to beat Bama. Hope y’all are ready for him to start all next year too!
Posted on 12/28/21 at 9:09 pm to SquatchDawg
quote:
straight out
Ha! You're talking about Kirby Smart. He'll say five different things in a single presser in response to the same question but it isn't necessarily the truth. When asked at the last presser about whether Daniels was practicing with the 1's, he said, "We don't disclose that information." He's stubborn and contentious with media.
Maybe he can't say what's really gone on. Maybe something occurred that caused him not to like Daniels?
Or maybe he's just got a thing for certain kinds of players and not others. He definitely didn't like Fields much...or Fields' attitude. He definitely liked Fromm's Warner Robins, good 'ol boy persona. Daniels is from CA and has a different background and personality.
Regardless, I would definitely not presume that Kirby is telling the truth, whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
This post was edited on 12/29/21 at 12:44 am
Posted on 12/28/21 at 9:20 pm to Bradb5291
quote:
Hope y’all are ready for him to start all next year too!
Hopefully not. He'll be 24 years old...I'm hoping we win out and then he can move on.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 9:31 pm to Lucius Clay
quote:
I'm hoping we win out and then he can move on.
If we win out, why the frick would we want him to move on?
Posted on 12/28/21 at 11:16 pm to FlexDawg
Hogwash!! I’m tired of this FALSE NARRATIVE spreading like wildfire. I come here and I see this BS! I go to the other site and I see even more BS. Stetson is not starting due to simply being better than JT. He’s starting because JT got caught doing some nose candy. THERE THE TRUTH IS OUT! Take it for what it’s worth but it’s the TRUTH. Sick of all this MYSTERY CRAP!
Posted on 12/28/21 at 11:39 pm to DawgsCallingShots

This post was edited on 12/28/21 at 11:40 pm
Posted on 12/29/21 at 12:06 am to Buzz Killington
The cünt nation is in full flow on the eve of us playing in a playoff game. Y’all are special.
Posted on 12/29/21 at 12:41 am to GoldenDawg
quote:
If we win out, why the frick would we want him to move on?
Because we will not have won out because of him, but rather in spite of him. And we can finally get back to the business of developing a pipeline of full-size, full performance, NFL-potential QBs. As we should.
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top



1






