Started By
Message

re: So There's A Good Chance We Go 10-3

Posted on 11/14/15 at 10:47 pm to
Posted by ugastreaker
South Ga
Member since Jun 2015
4105 posts
Posted on 11/14/15 at 10:47 pm to
Had Conley not caught he ball on instincts, we would have had one more play....clocked the ball, maybe two-three shots. Again, Richt and company went for it and we all fell short. Can't is BS because he hasn't.
Posted by JCdawg
Member since Sep 2014
7816 posts
Posted on 11/15/15 at 1:51 am to
Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but we don't have a single win over a team with a better than .500 record?

So Georgia Souther might be the first one?
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 11/15/15 at 5:38 am to
quote:

Lambert the guy who lost his starting job at Virgina?


Yes. I'm pretty sure he was a 4*, too. I am guessing, but I am guessing that the staff felt he did not get very good coaching and never developed. Maybe they saw
he had mechanical issues that they felt they could work with him on. Point is, they tried. It's not like they saw we had problems at QB and didn't do anything.

quote:

Ramsey was a very raw kid out of high school and they pretty much put all the eggs in that basket to being the heir after Murray.


No. They didn't put all their eggs in one basket. They had bauta and Jacob Park, yet ANOTHER 4* QB.

quote:

I always thought Bauta was a 3* and maybe even projected at FB?


He may have been...I was probably thinking of Jacob Park as the other 4* QB. FB, though? Could have been, but that would be a strange combination. They are typically 240-250LBS.

quote:

I don't know if Park would be any good, but I wish he stayed b/ he woulda got his chance.


Well, Alabama was wanting him bad, but SURELY they encouraged him to go because he was not developing.....but you are right....he would have been given a chance had he stayed.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 11/15/15 at 5:41 am to
quote:

We had a good call and the correct group.


I think so, too. Most criticism comes from the play not working. Hindsight is always 20/20. Had the play worked and we won the game NOBODY would have criticized the judgement. Everybody would be talking about how we wore down Alabama's defense...kept them on the field and ran the perfect play.

Ironic, though isn't it? If not for one play Richt would now be considered a genius and loved universally by UGA fans. Because that play got blown up they are calling for his head.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 11/15/15 at 5:48 am to
quote:

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but we don't have a single win over a team with a better than .500 record?

So Georgia Souther might be the first one?


Auburn?


Besides...did you realize that Ohio State and Iowa, two teams fighting to get into the playoffs have not played a ranked team this year yet?

Jim Harbaugh, the coach many on here hold up as the type of coach we need was taken into double OT against Indiana. Les Miles just got beat by Arkansas for the second time in a row. TCU barely beat Kansas because TCU's QB got hurt. (so QB seems to matter how a coach does)

In short, a LOT of coaches go into big games and lose them. True, it happens too often, here, but we tend to act like it only happens to Mark Richt.

ETA

My bad on the Auburn. With our loss they are now 5-5. Not better than .500. Chances are they finish 6-6.
This post was edited on 11/15/15 at 6:22 am
Posted by Dawgs9
Where ever I am
Member since Sep 2012
1943 posts
Posted on 11/15/15 at 6:41 am to
quote:

but figures now when we're eliminated from contention we win




Its this way every damn year, its the very reason CMR needs to be fired .
Posted by Dawgs9
Where ever I am
Member since Sep 2012
1943 posts
Posted on 11/15/15 at 6:59 am to
quote:

Who cares if we win 10 games but shite the bed again in the two biggest games of the season then have a let down game vs a shitty TeNN team. How does 10 wins cancel this out when it happens every god damn year with Richt? We will never win the Natty if we got Richt around and 10 wins ain't cutting it to get embarrassed in the biggest games of the season.




This....

Been saying this same thing for years.
Posted by Dawgs28
Member since Oct 2015
101 posts
Posted on 11/15/15 at 7:53 am to
quote:

Jim Harbaugh, the coach many on here hold up as the type of coach we need was taken into double OT against Indiana. Les Miles just got beat by Arkansas for the second time in a row. TCU barely beat Kansas because TCU's QB got hurt. (so QB seems to matter how a coach does)

In short, a LOT of coaches go into big games and lose them. True, it happens too often, here, but we tend to act like it only happens to Mark Richt.


I think the difference though is that OSU is undefeated, and Michigan State only has 2 losses (1 to MSU).

It's 1 thing to walk through an easy schedule with 0 or 1 losses. It's another thing to go through the same schedule with 3 and 4 losses.
Posted by Peter Buck
Member since Sep 2012
12415 posts
Posted on 11/15/15 at 8:12 am to
We lost to two ranked teams. Two top ten teams. Trade those with Purdue and Cornfrick U and we are top 15.
Posted by Dawgs28
Member since Oct 2015
101 posts
Posted on 11/15/15 at 8:44 am to
quote:

We were bent over against two ranked teams. Two top ten teams. Trade those with Purdue and Cornfrick U and we are top 15.


Fixed it for you. Oh, and don't forget the 4 loss team we lost to in addition to the ranked ones. I guess the argument is if Georgia could just go an entire season playing only 1 bowl eligible team then they would have 1 loss and be top 15? Yeah, I actually can't argue against that.

There are a lot of teams who could meet your top 15 criteria if they could replace the best 2 teams on their schedule with bottom feeders from any conference.
This post was edited on 11/15/15 at 8:53 am
Posted by JCdawg
Member since Sep 2014
7816 posts
Posted on 11/15/15 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Fixed it for you. Oh, and don't forget the 4 loss team we lost to in addition to the ranked ones. I guess the argument is if Georgia could just go an entire season playing only 1 bowl eligible team then they would have 1 loss and be top 15? Yeah, I actually can't argue against that. There are a lot of teams who could meet your top 15 criteria if they could replace the best 2 teams on their schedule with bottom feeders from any conference.



This is what I was saying earlier. Georgia Southern may end up being the only bowl eligible team we beat. Even if we go 10-3, there is enough justification not to be ranked.
Posted by GurleyGirl
Georgia
Member since Nov 2015
13165 posts
Posted on 11/15/15 at 9:31 am to
quote:

We lost to two ranked teams. Two top ten teams. Trade those with Purdue and Cornfrick U and we are top 15.



Quite true. Ohio St. has yet to play a ranked opponent. This gives them a decided advantage. They are still ranked in the top 4 and essentially have a seasons worth of practice games and likely a lot less chance of injuries compared with playing a SEC schedule.
Posted by Dawgs28
Member since Oct 2015
101 posts
Posted on 11/15/15 at 9:46 am to
quote:

Quite true. Ohio St. has yet to play a ranked opponent. This gives them a decided advantage. They are still ranked in the top 4 and essentially have a seasons worth of practice games and likely a lot less chance of injuries compared with playing a SEC schedule.


Oh yeah, without a doubt OSU has had a cupcake schedule. I just don't think that we should gloss over the fact that Georgia was drilled against the two good teams we played and lost to the only other team who is even bowl eligible thus far 10 games into the season. Georgia hasn't exactly had a traditional SEC schedule this season.
Posted by Peter Buck
Member since Sep 2012
12415 posts
Posted on 11/15/15 at 10:06 am to
The point is that UGA wouldn't be drilled by good teams if they didn't play them. I hope you can understand the basic concept whilst comparing schedules.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 11/15/15 at 10:34 am to
quote:

think the difference though is that OSU is undefeated


But the complaint I keep seeing is that we not beaten anyone. Who has OSU beaten?

quote:

and Michigan State only has 2 losses (1 to MSU).


I am guessing you mean michigan. They will probably lose three games when they playe Ohio State at the end of the year....and finish exactly like us. 9-3 with no win against a good team. So...what's the difference? but we need Harbaugh as our coach? I guess because he does the exact same thing, results wise, that Mark Richt does. Has Harbaugh won a National Championship? The exact resons you, and others on this board give for firing Richt....and yet you want Harbaugh.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 11/15/15 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Fixed it for you. Oh, and don't forget the 4 loss team we lost to in addition to the ranked ones. I guess the argument is if Georgia could just go an entire season playing only 1 bowl eligible team then they would have 1 loss and be top 15? Yeah, I actually can't argue against that.

There are a lot of teams who could meet your top 15 criteria if they could replace the best 2 teams on their schedule with bottom feeders from any conference.


You know what they call it when you lose by 1 point? A loss.

You know what the call it when you lose by 50? A loss.

You know how many losses go on your record when you lose by 1? One.

You know how many losses go on your record when you lose by 50? One.

2012 we lost BIG to South Carolina and STILL almost played for the National Championship.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 11/15/15 at 10:45 am to
quote:

This is what I was saying earlier. Georgia Southern may end up being the only bowl eligible team we beat. Even if we go 10-3, there is enough justification not to be ranked.



Then there is justification not to rank:
Michigan
TCU
Baylor
Florida State
Ohio State
Stanford

None have beaten a good team. None. Now, they HAVE beaten a bowl eligible team....but Auburn will be Bowl Eligible, Missouri has a shot...Kentucky has a good shot..so yeah, by the time the season is over we will have beaten several Bowl Eligible teams.
This post was edited on 11/15/15 at 10:54 am
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 11/15/15 at 10:47 am to
quote:

I guess the argument is if Georgia could just go an entire season playing only 1 bowl eligible team then they would have 1 loss and be top 15?


I guess this is going to be the narrative going forward? I'll tell you what....Ban bet. If we beat only one eligible team I leave for good. If we beat two bowl eligible teams you leave forever. Deal?
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 11/15/15 at 10:53 am to
quote:

Oh yeah, without a doubt OSU has had a cupcake schedule. I just don't think that we should gloss over the fact that Georgia was drilled against the two good teams we played and lost to the only other team who is even bowl eligible thus far 10 games into the season. Georgia hasn't exactly had a traditional SEC schedule this season.


LSU got drilled by a Top 10 team (Alabama) and then lost to Arkansas. ARKANSAS! And beaten soundly by Arkansas.

quote:

Georgia hasn't exactly had a traditional SEC schedule this season.


Yes. We have. We played every team on our schedule in our division and then added Auburn and Alabama. Isn't that a traditional SEC schedule? Because I was thinking it was. It's a tougher schedule than a lot of other teams.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 11/15/15 at 11:32 am to
We played a bunch of patsies.

CMR has been lucky the east has been so weak the last 6 years.

He is not a top tier coach and any objective thinker knows that.

first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter