Started By
Message
re: OT: Corona Panic 2020
Posted on 4/16/20 at 5:23 pm to DawgsLife
Posted on 4/16/20 at 5:23 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
This is where they are now.
Kind of like the size of his paltry inauguration crowd and his taxes not being releasable because they're still "under audit" four years later. Or that Article II of the Constitution "allows me to do whatever I want." And a few hundred other lies he likes to repeat... Sometime prior to the election, he will claim that he cured COVID-19.
But at least he hasn't claimed that Obama is a Muslim from Kenya lately.
When folks on a Deep South football board are this defensive about King Donald, you know America is in good shape.
Posted on 4/16/20 at 5:40 pm to Lucius Clay
We are in great shape. Glad you are finally coming around.
Posted on 4/16/20 at 5:43 pm to Lucius Clay
Don’t know what he could do differently. NYC is saying they aren’t opening until July. That’s going to decimate small businesses up there and that’s a democratic mayor. The idea was to flatten the curve and I think we’ve done a great job of that, it’s time to slowly start moving towards opening it back up. The idea wasn’t to run out the clock until the virus was completely gone.
I usually get turned off when people say “orange man bad” or accuse someone of TDS if they so much as ask a question about something trump says but you do seem to have some ulterior hatred against the guy. Tough times for everyone.
I usually get turned off when people say “orange man bad” or accuse someone of TDS if they so much as ask a question about something trump says but you do seem to have some ulterior hatred against the guy. Tough times for everyone.
Posted on 4/16/20 at 5:46 pm to Lucius Clay
quote:And this is why you're a braindead ignorant retarded lemming.
Kind of like the size of his paltry inauguration crowd and his taxes not being releasable because they're still "under audit" four years later. Or that Article II of the Constitution "allows me to do whatever I want." And a few hundred other lies he likes to repeat... Sometime prior to the election, he will claim that he cured COVID-19.
But at least he hasn't claimed that Obama is a Muslim from Kenya lately.
When folks on a Deep South football board are this defensive about King Donald, you know America is in good shape.
You believe this was Trump's crowd size because this is all you read/heard/saw in your assclown echo-chamber:
That picture was taken before everyone got there, and the Lefty MSM tried to pass it off as during primetime.
But in reality, here were the real crowds during the actual inauguration ceremony, clipped from CNN's own wide-angle stationary camera:
Yeah, so paltry. LOL, idiot.
You are a sad little brainwashed TDS afflicted loon, and you suck at life. Again, seek help, soon.
This post was edited on 4/16/20 at 5:53 pm
Posted on 4/16/20 at 5:53 pm to BeefDawg
quote:
Please tell me you're not some Obamacare apologist who doesn't believe millions of people got royally fricked over by that Act.
I've made no bones about it in the past that the end product was very flawed. But to that end, the millions who were negatively impacted may also have substantial overlap with the 100 million-plus individuals that were positively impacted by the removal of things like "pre-existing condition" clauses/limitations/denials. It was a mixed bag that in a more ideal political climate could have been collaborated on and reshaped to greatly improve things generally... instead, we get the typical clusterfrick that is our political system and it got rammed through in poor form due to literally no ability of either side to play in the god damn sandbox together without shitting on each others hands.
I asked because I felt there was more at play than was being described. My comment to rig was not specific to your post, but rather the general tone of posters on the board right now.
Moving past that...
First of all.. shite dude. That sounds like a rough 3+ years. I sincerely hope that you've got all that behind you.
With respect to the plan design, it does sound like some ACA related things may have been at play, but as with most things, it didn't happen in a vacuum. It also sounds like Wellstar made some decisions that impacted you that were neither requirements of, nor driven by, specific ACA policies. It's possible they made the decisions on their own, but very likely they were given guidance from their consultants on where to cut to save on costs.
There are plenty of businesses that are still self-insured. The ACA didn't mandate that Wellstar change to Humana (or any of the other subsequent changes). Correlation does not equal causality.
Without sharing specifics, I can tell you that I listened in on numerous conversations for large employer HR teams with their consultants where they all discussed options and were actively making decisions to decrease coverage costs in general given the unique opportunity to shift responsibility from themselves to recent government policy changes (ACA). Make of that what you will.
Posted on 4/16/20 at 5:58 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Damn how did I miss this comment from Beefdawg... I have never seen fibonnacci get served in such a way.
... Have been more than a little tied up with life. Sorry I only just had the chance to respond.
Posted on 4/16/20 at 6:21 pm to fibonaccisquared
quote:I'm not going to argue with you, but just making it clear this is 1000% false.
Correlation does not equal causality.
My wife is a manager and got very specific training and guidelines on how to explain the coverage changes to her subordinates. And I saw emails from Wellstar corporate that stated flat out, these new plans are changing directly because they must comply with ACA standards.
We had 14 straight years of the same great coverage, and the instant the employer mandate of the ACA went into effect, everything changed.
So it's crazy to say the ACA wasn't the cause. Wellstar was, and still is, making great profits year over year. I've seen the balance sheets. They didn't make these changes because of money issues at all. They lost hundreds of great longtime skilled employees because of how bad these changes were. So much so that they started handing out extra mid-year bonuses and even increased the matching percentage on 403b contributions.
And trust me, we complained to corporate about the coverage, along with thousands of other employees. And the answer was the same... "Sorry, we are forced by law to design and offer the coverage like this."
Also, 100 million-plus people were not "positively impacted" as a result of allowing pre-existing conditions.
People who had a job and coverage through an employer already had full coverage with pre-existing conditions.
The removal of that stipulation only effected people who did not have employer-sponsored health coverage. And only 18-20 million people ever signed up for it. And of those 18-20 million, only 3-5 million had been previously denied health coverage prior to the ACA.
Millions of people with pre-existing conditions still refused to buy Obamacare out of their own choice.
Anyway, I'm not going to re-argue this with someone again. I've done it too many times, and I know way too much about this thing, and it makes me re-live it too much.
This post was edited on 4/16/20 at 6:28 pm
Posted on 4/16/20 at 6:34 pm to BeefDawg
I'm in a similar boat to beef.
My employer offered a great health insurance plan. The cost went up annual. But it was low deductible and had great family coverage.
After ACA, the employer started pushing the high deductible health plan.
A year later, the high deductible health plan was the only one offered.
Now I get an $8k out of pocket maximum per person (not great for a family of 6). And my premium is the same as the low deductible health plan.
That is my only choice through my employer.
ACA isn't insurance. It has no valuation of risk. All it does is act as a private/public tax. It is literally the worst out of any health insurance system in the world.
My employer offered a great health insurance plan. The cost went up annual. But it was low deductible and had great family coverage.
After ACA, the employer started pushing the high deductible health plan.
A year later, the high deductible health plan was the only one offered.
Now I get an $8k out of pocket maximum per person (not great for a family of 6). And my premium is the same as the low deductible health plan.
That is my only choice through my employer.
ACA isn't insurance. It has no valuation of risk. All it does is act as a private/public tax. It is literally the worst out of any health insurance system in the world.
Posted on 4/16/20 at 7:27 pm to BeefDawg
quote:
Anyway, I'm not going to re-argue this with someone again. I've done it too many times, and I know way too much about this thing, and it makes me re-live it too much.
Obamacare absolutely screwed every working American that pays for their own healthcare; ESPECIALLY teachers, cops and 1st responders
it was a massive power grab and transfer of wealth
Obama, and Democrats in general, always talk about education and "helping teachers"
well; Obama screwed over ever teacher in the country and because of his policies, EVERY teacher in the country lost income & got dealt MAJOR reduction in benefits AND had costs go up at the same time - pay more and have the quality of your health carer decrease)
he took money out of the hands of teachers and cops
he lied (leftists want to talk to me about Trump lies, what a hoot - Trump has not directly reduced the quality of life for teachers, Obama 1000% did and lied to us about what we were getting into)
Posted on 4/16/20 at 7:40 pm to fibonaccisquared
dude, the ACA was a disaster
it hurt working Americans in a major way
copays went up and options/choices were DRAMATICALLY reduced
I am mad at the Republicans on health care as well; because FAR too many of them are beholden to the big insurance companies -- they STILL have not taken away the barriers that prevent folks from buying across state lines
it hurt working Americans in a major way
copays went up and options/choices were DRAMATICALLY reduced
I am mad at the Republicans on health care as well; because FAR too many of them are beholden to the big insurance companies -- they STILL have not taken away the barriers that prevent folks from buying across state lines
This post was edited on 4/16/20 at 7:41 pm
Posted on 4/16/20 at 8:01 pm to dcbl
This fact checker thing is pretty fun to read.
This is false. On numerous occasions in February, Trump said he expected the virus to go away in April.
- Feb. 10, in an interview: "You know in April, supposedly, it dies with the hotter weather.
-Feb. 10, in public remarks: "You know, a lot of people think goes away in April with the heat as the heat comes in.
-Feb. 10, in a campaign rally: "Looks like by April, you know, in theory, when it gets a little warmer, it miraculously goes away.
-It's a problem, we think and we hope, based on all signs that the problem goes away in April
-Feb. 14, in a speech: "There's a theory that, in April, when it gets warm -- historically, that has been able to kill the virus
-Feb. 19, in an interview: "I think when we get into April, in the warmer weather, that has a very negative effect on that and that type of a virus
----
Those are the quotes that this author uses to prove he is correct. Those are some strong statements right? Supposedly. People think. In theory. We think and we hope. There's a theory. I think.
Oh yeah, Trump is definitely making definitive statements that the virus will be over by a certain date
quote:
Apr 02 2020
“I didn't say a date....I said it's going away and it is going away.”
This is false. On numerous occasions in February, Trump said he expected the virus to go away in April.
- Feb. 10, in an interview: "You know in April, supposedly, it dies with the hotter weather.
-Feb. 10, in public remarks: "You know, a lot of people think goes away in April with the heat as the heat comes in.
-Feb. 10, in a campaign rally: "Looks like by April, you know, in theory, when it gets a little warmer, it miraculously goes away.
-It's a problem, we think and we hope, based on all signs that the problem goes away in April
-Feb. 14, in a speech: "There's a theory that, in April, when it gets warm -- historically, that has been able to kill the virus
-Feb. 19, in an interview: "I think when we get into April, in the warmer weather, that has a very negative effect on that and that type of a virus
----
Those are the quotes that this author uses to prove he is correct. Those are some strong statements right? Supposedly. People think. In theory. We think and we hope. There's a theory. I think.
Oh yeah, Trump is definitely making definitive statements that the virus will be over by a certain date
Posted on 4/16/20 at 8:18 pm to devils1854
quote:
quote:
Apr 02 2020
“I didn't say a date....I said it's going away and it is going away.”
------------------------------
This is false. On numerous occasions in February, Trump said he expected the virus to go away in April.
in April is a date?
I will remember that the next time my wife asks me to do something
I WILL DO IT IN MAY, HONEY!
she won't be able to get mad, since I gave her a date, right?
eta - the "fact checkers" are pathetic; mostly propagandists
your post is one of many examples that proves it
This post was edited on 4/16/20 at 8:20 pm
Posted on 4/16/20 at 8:49 pm to olddawg26
quote:
The idea was to flatten the curve and I think we’ve done a great job of that, it’s time to slowly start moving towards opening it back up. The idea wasn’t to run out the clock until the virus was completely gone.
I dont think you know what their real idea was.
Posted on 4/16/20 at 8:51 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
Calling Trump people a cult, yet I have not seen children being taught to sing praises to him, yet.
Both parties have insane people who worship their chosen ones. This board is filled with the trump ones.
Posted on 4/16/20 at 8:54 pm to dcbl
quote:
in April is a date?
April is a month. He has 2 weeks to be proven right, but so far he is looking like quite the idiot.
Posted on 4/16/20 at 9:00 pm to Whiznot
quote:
Posted by Whiznot ? ? on 3/16/20 at 8:45 pm to meansonny
On 2-27-2020 my guess of US coronavirus deaths this year was 1,000,000 people. Now I think that more than that will die.
You had the balls to give a number. Props to you (unlike jds who was/is chickenshit).
I had the estimated US fatality from covid at 30,000.
We passed that number in the last 48 hours. I can admit when I was off/wrong.
Posted on 4/16/20 at 9:00 pm to djsdawg
quote:you're projecting
so far he is looking like quite the idiot.
Posted on 4/16/20 at 9:07 pm to dcbl
quote:
they STILL have not taken away the barriers that prevent folks from buying across state lines
What do you expect that to solve?
Posted on 4/16/20 at 9:13 pm to BeefDawg
Let's see what legitimate source you've linked that story from????
"Those were the pictures from before everyone showed up."
Uh huh...yeah, that was the latest alt-right propaganda after National Park Service admitted to doctoring Trump's inauguration photos at White House request. I guess it was a bit too embarrassing for the Orange King to have a crowd one third of the size of the black man from Kenya.
NPS doctored Trump inauguration crowd photos
There have several analyses of the 2009 and 2017 inauguration crowd sizes at the same time. Trump loses BIGLY in those. Sorry but both pics were taken at 11 am.
Fact Checker sums it up:
Regardless, Trump and Spicer argued that the media misrepresented the size of the crowd at the inauguration, and we don’t find any evidence of that. To the contrary, it was Trump and Spicer who provided false information to feed a false narrative about crowd size.
The Facts on Crowd Size
What's next? Got anything on Hillary Clinton's DC pizza parlor pedo ring?
"Those were the pictures from before everyone showed up."
Uh huh...yeah, that was the latest alt-right propaganda after National Park Service admitted to doctoring Trump's inauguration photos at White House request. I guess it was a bit too embarrassing for the Orange King to have a crowd one third of the size of the black man from Kenya.
NPS doctored Trump inauguration crowd photos
There have several analyses of the 2009 and 2017 inauguration crowd sizes at the same time. Trump loses BIGLY in those. Sorry but both pics were taken at 11 am.
Fact Checker sums it up:
Regardless, Trump and Spicer argued that the media misrepresented the size of the crowd at the inauguration, and we don’t find any evidence of that. To the contrary, it was Trump and Spicer who provided false information to feed a false narrative about crowd size.
The Facts on Crowd Size
What's next? Got anything on Hillary Clinton's DC pizza parlor pedo ring?
Posted on 4/16/20 at 9:17 pm to Lucius Clay
We need sports back on tv. Everyone’s going crazy
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top


4





