Started By
Message

re: Looks Like Stafford Has Covid

Posted on 8/5/20 at 3:55 pm to
Posted by FinleyStreet
Member since Aug 2011
7897 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 3:55 pm to
Honestly, your posts don't make me angry, just sad.

The National Pulse? Now I know you are trolling. You may as well post something from the Daily Mail. Also, a diatribe about lobbying? That's neither here nor there.

I don't have a problem with your opinions, just the way you've chosen to support them (or the fact you think you're supporting something when you aren't). I'm not trying to be rude, but this whole thread is a testament to how deeply the public school system has failed us.

Debate, scientific method as well as scientific evidence (what constitutes good evidence and what doesn't) should be part of the school curriculum. The debate pyramid is your friend; so is the hierarchy of scientific evidence. Check them out if you get a minute.



Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

Honestly, your posts don't make me angry, just sad.
You are sad. Pathetically.

quote:

The National Pulse? Now I know you are trolling. You may as well post something from the Daily Mail. Also, a diatribe about lobbying? That's neither here nor there.

I don't have a problem with your opinions, just the way you've chosen to support them (or the fact you think you're supporting something when you aren't). I'm not trying to be rude, but this whole thread is a testament to how deeply the public school system has failed us.

Debate, scientific method as well as scientific evidence (what constitutes good evidence and what doesn't) should be part of the school curriculum. The debate pyramid is your friend; so is the hierarchy of scientific evidence. Check them out if you get a minute.

This is your fricking reply??

To mention the source, ignore the goddamn 8 page FDA document and content, ignore the quotes from a Yale epidemiologist, and simply dismiss it all???

frick you, man. You suck. Just another a-hole on this site. Ugh.
Posted by baconwaffle
Houston
Member since Jan 2013
589 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 4:14 pm to
You post one article. Even if it’s true, please logically explain how that delivers us to your conclusion that all scientists are lying.

You have accused so many people of lying to the American people. Scientists, engineers, journalists, teachers, doctors, lawyers. So all these professions are quacks, bought, or otherwise liars, but the people who know the secret truth are who exactly? You? Your white trash, underemployed friends? You sound like Joe McCarthy with your conspiratorial nonsense.
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

You post one article. Even if it’s true, please logically explain how that delivers us to your conclusion that all scientists are lying.
I didn’t say all scientists, you dishonest shite for brains.

I very explicitly said some scientists are saying one thing and some are saying the opposite.

Ergo, SOME OF THEM must be lying.

And I choose to believe the ones who are not touting the narrative of the media that told us HCQ, a drug millions of people have safely taken for 50 years, is dangerous. A media that lies all day every fricking day about shite from koi fish, to fish tank cleaner, to freaking non-peaceful as hell riots (aka. “peaceful protests”).

Again, you simply can’t be honest about what I’ve said with something as simple as this.

This is why you’re a piece of shite horrible person and deserve every bad thing that happens to you.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
63831 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 4:51 pm to
Blue canary in the outlet by the light switch, who watches over you?
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 4:59 pm to
Are you the only bee in my bonnet?
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
63831 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 5:44 pm to
You've put too fine a point on it.

But thanks for being a night light in the darkness.

I ran out of energy with these people months ago.
Posted by baconwaffle
Houston
Member since Jan 2013
589 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

I didn’t say all scientists, you dishonest shite for brains.

I very explicitly said some scientists are saying one thing and some are saying the opposite.


99-plus percent of the medical and scientific field is unified on these views, and you are citing an extreme minority. So you are effectively saying they are all lying, even if you don’t use those words. So, in the interest of literal precision, I take my statement back. You are saying that almost all of these people are liars.

quote:

Again, you simply can’t be honest about what I’ve said with something as simple as this.

If I’m guilty of misrepresenting what you’ve said, then you’re certainly guilty of misrepresenting what I’ve said. You insist on calling everyone you disagree with communists, extreme leftists, or people who hate America, without evidence.
This post was edited on 8/5/20 at 6:41 pm
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

99-plus percent of the medical and scientific field is unified on these views
Bull fricking shite.

You just can't help lying.

This is the same bullshite you assholes tried with the retarded "97% of all scientists agree on the global warming... err cooling... err climate change issue!"

You're a tool.
Posted by Whiznot
Albany, GA
Member since Oct 2013
6995 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 6:44 pm to
I hate people who use dawgs for beef. I wish everyone would go grocery shopping instead of chasing down and eating strays.
Posted by baconwaffle
Houston
Member since Jan 2013
589 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

global warming... err cooling... err climate change issue

It’s actually pretty straightforward. Sun warms up planet. Plants photosynthesize CO2 and sunlight, taking the warmth and greenhouse gas out of the environment. Plants get buried, and converted into fossil fuels over millions of years. When we burn fossil fuels, we release CO2 and heat back into the atmosphere. I’m assuming you’re not familiar, but look up the Carboniferous period, assuming you don’t believe the earth is 4500 years old. They won’t say it publicly, for obvious reasons, but historic climate change is a basic assumption in how geologists for petrochemical companies find oil. So yes, there is near 100% scientific consensus on climate change.
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

It’s actually pretty straightforward. Sun warms up planet. Plants photosynthesize CO2 and sunlight, taking the warmth and greenhouse gas out of the environment. Plants get buried, and converted into fossil fuels over millions of years. When we burn fossil fuels, we release CO2 and heat back into the atmosphere. I’m assuming you’re not familiar, but look up the Carboniferous period, assuming you don’t believe the earth is 4500 years old. They won’t say it publicly, for obvious reasons, but historic climate change is a basic assumption in how geologists for petrochemical companies find oil. So yes, there is near 100% scientific consensus on climate change.
LOL, of course this was your reply.

My God. SMFH
Posted by Whiznot
Albany, GA
Member since Oct 2013
6995 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 9:36 pm to
Posted by TMDawg
Member since Nov 2012
5374 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 9:42 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/5/20 at 9:47 pm
Posted by FaCubeItches
Soviet Monica, People's Republic CA
Member since Sep 2012
5875 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 3:30 am to
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter