Started By
Message
re: Let's get political!
Posted on 3/19/26 at 5:34 am to meansonny
Posted on 3/19/26 at 5:34 am to meansonny
You obviously didn't watch the first thirty seconds.
Yeah I don't understand why my definition of a threat matters. The folks with the highest clearance are saying there wasn't a threat. Of you have information to the contrary that came out before the strikes and it isn't propaganda feel free to share. They were heavily sanctioned, had no enriched in nuclear, were willing to negotiate, and had the same missiles they have had.
Iran is not a threat to me at my house. They have no capability of impacting me. As mentioned they can cause trouble for the bases and Israel. Why wouldn't I downplay Iran as a threat lol
North Korea has been thrown in to compare how America treats foreign adversaries with nukes and without. I don't think north Korea is a threat but based on your definition of extremists you would have to invade them next. The kill their own people and have actual nuclear bombs. They are right by japan and South Korea two of our most important allies.
Yeah I don't understand why my definition of a threat matters. The folks with the highest clearance are saying there wasn't a threat. Of you have information to the contrary that came out before the strikes and it isn't propaganda feel free to share. They were heavily sanctioned, had no enriched in nuclear, were willing to negotiate, and had the same missiles they have had.
Iran is not a threat to me at my house. They have no capability of impacting me. As mentioned they can cause trouble for the bases and Israel. Why wouldn't I downplay Iran as a threat lol
North Korea has been thrown in to compare how America treats foreign adversaries with nukes and without. I don't think north Korea is a threat but based on your definition of extremists you would have to invade them next. The kill their own people and have actual nuclear bombs. They are right by japan and South Korea two of our most important allies.
2
Posted on 3/19/26 at 5:35 am to deeprig9
Why wouldn't they? They are trying to survive as a government/nation. What better way to deter Israel and the US from bombing them again in 6 months than to cause a global supply chain crisis every time they do.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 5:42 am to meansonny
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. More energy infrastructure hit in Saudi Arabia. This needs to stop soon
Posted on 3/19/26 at 6:17 am to Wwarmouth
Gold, silver, crypto, SP500 all down significantly this morning.
At what point in this war will you admit it has been a mistake? Global recession? Your children not being to buy groceries for their families?
And please add your thoughts on the 200 Billion request from the pentagon. I wonder what your reaction would be in that amount of money was floated for something like new home buyer assistance or childcare stipends...I bet you would recoil and say I don't want my tax dollars going to handouts for others....but when it is to send our soldiers to die and to bomb a country that will never be friendly to America just because Israel wants us to, you nod along gleefully. "Hrumph! This is America First!"
Just a generation of buffoons.
At what point in this war will you admit it has been a mistake? Global recession? Your children not being to buy groceries for their families?
And please add your thoughts on the 200 Billion request from the pentagon. I wonder what your reaction would be in that amount of money was floated for something like new home buyer assistance or childcare stipends...I bet you would recoil and say I don't want my tax dollars going to handouts for others....but when it is to send our soldiers to die and to bomb a country that will never be friendly to America just because Israel wants us to, you nod along gleefully. "Hrumph! This is America First!"
Just a generation of buffoons.
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 6:55 am
Posted on 3/19/26 at 6:20 am to Wwarmouth
quote:
They were heavily sanctioned
They ignored the sanctions for the most part
quote:
had no enriched in nuclear
Speculation, some reports stating the granite covered site could have been used to make dirty bombs
quote:
were willing to negotiate,
yea, “negotiate.” Just like the 40 times before. A front to keep up their terrorism quote:
and had the same missiles they have had.
Vastly incorrect. I provided many links, non CNN/FOX links contradicting this
That’s the last I need to say to you. I’ve put all your BS to rest except for your OMB feelings. Sad, but you do you. We will pray for you and our men and women abroad that fight everyday to keep us all safe. God Bless
Posted on 3/19/26 at 6:24 am to IT_Dawg
Buddy the link you provided said shipments would start in 2027
Please explain how counties ignore sanctions lol their economy was shite brother. They had nothing going on.
Omanian and British mediators both said an aggressive deal was presented by Iran and then two days later the bombing started. I've shared links to that.
If you want to keep you head buried and defend every single thing your dear leader says...go for it (totally not a cult though)....you don't have to rationalize every thing, it's okay to admit you were wrong about him.
Please explain how counties ignore sanctions lol their economy was shite brother. They had nothing going on.
Omanian and British mediators both said an aggressive deal was presented by Iran and then two days later the bombing started. I've shared links to that.
If you want to keep you head buried and defend every single thing your dear leader says...go for it (totally not a cult though)....you don't have to rationalize every thing, it's okay to admit you were wrong about him.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 6:42 am to Wwarmouth
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Thoughts from any of the supporters of this war? Not even a month into this btw
Posted on 3/19/26 at 6:54 am to Wwarmouth
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. The other portion of this energy crisis is that now we are helping Russia. May be the worst political gambit of all time.
But yes, the administration was prepared and knew this would happen. What a joke
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:36 am to Wwarmouth
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:43 am to Wwarmouth
quote:
South Korea considers Importing Russian Oil
quote:
May be the worst political gambit of all time.
You are such a damn drama queen.
quote:
What a joke
You come here and disparage folks for their media sources yet it's clear that you comb the internet and social media for any source that will fit your narrative.
That's the joke.
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 7:50 am
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:53 am to tgdawg68
I haven't anything about sources. That was it dawg
Why is it dramatic to point out the billions of dollars we sent to Ukraine to harm Russia have been wasted due to billions of dollars we are now trying spend for a new war? All in a mid term year...all while you had a chance to make real, positive changes for Americans at home.
Why is it dramatic to point out the billions of dollars we sent to Ukraine to harm Russia have been wasted due to billions of dollars we are now trying spend for a new war? All in a mid term year...all while you had a chance to make real, positive changes for Americans at home.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:47 am to Wwarmouth
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:55 am to Wwarmouth
We had higher prices in 2023 and significantly higher in 2022 and somehow we survived.
More drama.
More drama.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:12 am to tgdawg68
Yes, now think about why those came down...and understand the reason those came down is now getting bombed. Use your brain buddy
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:28 am to Wwarmouth
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. You know what could have helped these numbers? Lower interest rates. Mortgage rates were at a 3 year low before we bombed. Now back to the 7% range
Posted on 3/19/26 at 10:09 am to Wwarmouth
quote:
Yeah I don't understand why my definition of a threat matters. The folks with the highest clearance are saying there wasn't a threat.
What is a woman?
How can you have confirmation or contradiction if 350M people in the US all have a different definition of "imminent"?
Are you seeing the problem with this attempt at wordplay over what is imminent?
Since no one can define Imminent but the commander in chief, does imminent even need to matter?
Iran has 60% enriched and a facility remaining that enriches.
2 months.
12 months.
24 months.
What is the difference whether imminent matters when the defined objective of POTUS was "Iran cannot have nuclear weapons".
If you don't want to attempt to define imminent, that is fine.
Candid question.
Is the president's objective a good one? No nukes for Iran?
Posted on 3/19/26 at 10:13 am to Wwarmouth
quote:
You know what could have helped these numbers? Lower interest rates. Mortgage rates were at a 3 year low before we bombed. Now back to the 7% range
Rates (like stocks) flow in a range. There is a high and low and they bounce up and down indefinitely until new information comes along and breaks either the ceiling or the floor of that range.
The war isn't impacting home sales.
The biggest driver of home sales is job security.
You have a ton of government workers without that right now.
You have a lot of blue collar and white collar workers concerned about the inevitability of robotics and AI.
And we have a relatively static new construction which has been incapable of applying downward pressure on homes (since the drive up on home prices during/after covid).
It isn't the interest rates because they have been in this corridor for a while. It is job security.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 10:17 am to meansonny
Never said it was impacting home sales
Posted on 3/19/26 at 10:25 am to meansonny
Our government wasn't founded to have one person define what imminent is.
But again, you want to drag the convo into semantics...pass.
No nuclear weapons is an admirable goal and worth pursuing. Do you think the only way to accomplish that is through bon ing them? Do you think that will make them more likely or less likely to want a deterrent to prevent getting attacked again?
Why did the presidents envoy decline a deal that two diplomats from our allies said was more than fair and would have been a win for the trump admin?
But again, you want to drag the convo into semantics...pass.
No nuclear weapons is an admirable goal and worth pursuing. Do you think the only way to accomplish that is through bon ing them? Do you think that will make them more likely or less likely to want a deterrent to prevent getting attacked again?
Why did the presidents envoy decline a deal that two diplomats from our allies said was more than fair and would have been a win for the trump admin?
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:30 am to Wwarmouth
This guy. Right on cue.
Page 14 of 15
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News