Started By
Message
If Tua played his first game back ~28 days as QB from tightrope surgery
Posted on 10/20/23 at 10:05 am
Posted on 10/20/23 at 10:05 am
Assuming Brock heals the exact same, which no doubt he would probably sooner. That puts him back on the field to play in game by 11/13.
That is 5 days prior to the UT game.
My prediction is he will be back for UT. Not saying he will be 100% but at least a decoy and/or pitch count
Any other game return predictions? (no trolls)
That is 5 days prior to the UT game.
My prediction is he will be back for UT. Not saying he will be 100% but at least a decoy and/or pitch count
Any other game return predictions? (no trolls)
Posted on 10/20/23 at 10:09 am to Dawg4Life47
We seem to be clearing players at 4 weeks. But for whatever reasons (bye week included), they aren't playing until 6 weeks.
It might be conditioning.
It might be lack of need based on scheme/opponent.
It might be that they need the extra time despite our medical staff clearing them for contact.
It might be conditioning.
It might be lack of need based on scheme/opponent.
It might be that they need the extra time despite our medical staff clearing them for contact.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 10:11 am to Dawg4Life47
I thought Tua missed 1 game. I had read that he was back 12 days from surgery (and per reports, he didn't look great against LSU in 2019). The following week, he hurt his hip trying to escape the pocket and getting creamed.
It is one of the arguments that "back earlier is possible but may not be recommended".
It is one of the arguments that "back earlier is possible but may not be recommended".
Posted on 10/20/23 at 10:17 am to Dawg4Life47
Tua didn't move and cut the way Brock does. No way he plays until January 1.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:09 am to Rex Feral
He was playing QB, he has to play every down and cut or plant on every play
I would think the strain on Tua had to be greater since Bowers doesn't play every down and even if he is in, sometimes he is just running a route with not much to do other than a block attempt, if that.
I would think the strain on Tua had to be greater since Bowers doesn't play every down and even if he is in, sometimes he is just running a route with not much to do other than a block attempt, if that.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:11 am to meansonny
quote:
It might be lack of need based on scheme/opponent.
My guess is a lot of this because Kirby seems to be creating schemes based on each opponent separately.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:25 am to Rex Feral
quote:
Tua didn't move and cut the way Brock does. No way he plays until January 1.
?
Rewatch the 2017 NCG.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:53 am to meansonny
That wasn’t the year he got hurt and when he came back he was a statue.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:56 am to CBBDawg316
The injury was 2019.
My reply was to the idea that Tua doesn't need his ankle more than Bowers.
I couldn't disagree more.
2017 mobility and 2019 lack of mobility as supporting proofs.
My reply was to the idea that Tua doesn't need his ankle more than Bowers.
I couldn't disagree more.
2017 mobility and 2019 lack of mobility as supporting proofs.
This post was edited on 10/20/23 at 11:56 am
Posted on 10/20/23 at 12:02 pm to meansonny
quote:
My reply was to the idea that Tua doesn't need his ankle more than Bowers.
there's a pretty massive difference between a regular sized QB who drops back and throws the ball compared to a large TE who has to block other 250 pounders as well as catch adn run before being dragged to the ground.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 2:28 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
compared to a large TE who has to block other 250 pounders
It has been repeated that blocking is easier on the feet/ankles than skill positions. I'm not sure why you bring this up with regards to the injury.
quote:
catch adn run before being dragged to the ground.
Who has the ball every snap and what is the defense trying to do to that guy with about 4 to 6 defenders every play?
Posted on 10/20/23 at 3:33 pm to meansonny
quote:
t has been repeated that blocking is easier on the feet/ankles than skill positions. I'm not sure why you bring this up with regards to the injury.
because common sense dictates that lockign up and grappling with a 250 pounder is harder on the body than standing in shotgun and throwing a ball
quote:
Who has the ball every snap and what is the defense trying to do to that guy with about 4 to 6 defenders every play?
it's like you intentionally glossed over the important part in your very own post. A QB in shotgun could go literally AN ENTIRE GAME without being sacked or roughed up. Half the time they're handing the ball to someone else anyway. With Brock he's either going ot be locked up blocking someone or running a route. The route may not go to him which would be a relief on his ankle. If he does catch the ball, unless he scores or runs out of bounds there is a 100% chance that he WILL be tackled. Every single play he's on the field, he'll either be engaged with someone or running. There are no other things he could be doing on the field. A QB may not need to move quickly more than a couple steps at a time.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 3:38 pm to WG_Dawg
Im thinking 5-6 weeks for him to make a difference on the field.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 3:41 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
. A QB in shotgun could go literally AN ENTIRE GAME without being sacked or roughed up.
You are right.
A mobile QB could elude the pass rush.
That is why the QB relies so heavily on his feet and ankles.
quote:
If he does catch the ball, unless he scores or runs out of bounds there is a 100% chance that he WILL be tackled.
So he doesn't get tackled if he's blocking, or running a route, or goes out of bounds, or gets in the end zone? And when he is tackled to the ground, how many times is there stress on the ankle?
Every time a QB throws the football, he stresses the ankle. QB is a precision skill (like a lot of things in baseball). Injuries affect repetition and precision. Tua's first game back from his tightrope was about 52% completion percentage. Tight ends don't catch balls when they aren't accurate from the QB.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 4:46 pm to meansonny
I am thinking he will be ready by GT but won’t play until the SECCG if we make it there. He won’t play in any of the next 4 games that determine whether or not we get there.
I am hoping that his assured absence during at least 3 of those game sparks/forces this offense to level up. I wouldn’t want any other coach in college football over Kirby to try to turn this into a blessing instead of a curse.
I am hoping that his assured absence during at least 3 of those game sparks/forces this offense to level up. I wouldn’t want any other coach in college football over Kirby to try to turn this into a blessing instead of a curse.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 6:02 pm to Dirk Dawgler
quote:
I am hoping that his assured absence during at least 3 of those game sparks/forces this offense to level up. I wouldn’t want any other coach in college football over Kirby to try to turn this into a blessing instead of a curse.
Same here.
And if the rest of the team can't step up in his absence, which I believe they will, then we don't deserve to go to the SECCG.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 8:21 pm to meansonny
quote:
Rewatch the 2017 NCG
I’m not in the mood to cry
This post was edited on 10/21/23 at 7:16 am
Posted on 10/20/23 at 9:06 pm to Dawg4Life47
Brock is basically done for the rest of the season. He will not be coming back 100%z he will be 70% at best, and that’s not the Brock that stretches the field as a mismatch. Sadly he will just be another “ “ out there.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:18 pm to DawgsCallingShots
Totally disagree
Even if it’s 6 week recovery that is before the SECG
Assuming we make the playoff then add 4 more weeks
Easily back to 100% by then
Even if it’s 6 week recovery that is before the SECG
Assuming we make the playoff then add 4 more weeks
Easily back to 100% by then
Posted on 10/22/23 at 2:21 pm to Rex Feral
quote:
quote:
Rewatch the 2017 NCG
I’m not in the mood to cry
I still get nervous watching the Oklahoma game.
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
