Started By
Message
re: Fox returning as MBB coach next year
Posted on 3/7/17 at 4:34 pm to WG_Dawg
Posted on 3/7/17 at 4:34 pm to WG_Dawg
Pretty much my perspective. Like Richt, Fox is a great person and a good coach but after 8 years I think it's obvious he's not going to be able to recruit well enough to take our team to the next level in which we make it to the NCAA tournament most seasons and get past the first round in the tournament.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 5:48 pm to GurleyGirl
Our fans don't deserve a good basketball team. All the old fan sit down the whole entire game, And that's if they are even there. We can't even fill the lower bowl of Stegemam. I feel bad for Fox and the players that commit to us for our half arse fan base.
Our fans complaining about basketball, is like wake forest fans complaining about football. Quit pretending like you care.
Our fans complaining about basketball, is like wake forest fans complaining about football. Quit pretending like you care.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 6:29 pm to DawgNation4
quote:
All the old fan sit down the whole entire game, And that's if they are even there. We can't even fill the lower bowl of Stegemam.
Y'all gonna realize: Georgia Athletics is a big club and we all ain't in it.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 10:58 pm to RD Dawg
Bottom line is it has been 8 years and we are a mediocre basketball program by any standard you wish to judge it by.
If that is OK with you, fine. But I would think that Georgia would aspire to a higher standard. It can be done at Athens with the right coach.
If that is OK with you, fine. But I would think that Georgia would aspire to a higher standard. It can be done at Athens with the right coach.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 1:53 am to Peter Buck
quote:
Vitale sure did.
Of course, Dick Vitale also gets really excited about Pizza Hut.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 6:32 am to tylerdurden24
McGarity doesn't want to spend any money on a basketball coach
Posted on 3/8/17 at 7:08 am to WhopperDawg
quote:
Bottom line is it has been 8 years and we are a mediocre basketball program by any standard you wish to judge it by.
If that is OK with you, fine. But I would think that Georgia would aspire to a higher standard. It can be done at Athens with the right coach.
Based on history, the program has been above average. This is not even debatable unless you are a Millennial. I do agree it could be better and should be better.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 7:24 am to Peter Buck
quote:
Based on history, the program has been above average.
Being the tallest midget shouldn't be the goal.
quote:
I do agree it could be better and should be better.
Now you are talking.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 8:31 am to Peter Buck
quote:
Based on history, the program has been above average
I think we all agree on that
quote:
I do agree it could be better and should be better.
I think MANY of us agree on that too, we could and should be better. And we aren't going to get any better with fox at the helm.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 10:18 am to Peter Buck
quote:
I do agree it could be better and should be better.
agreed. That's all I was getting at.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 2:38 pm to DawgCountry
If we get a mid major guy who does well, he will be gone in a few years based on the overall package we offer. That's the chicken and egg thing we face.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 2:48 pm to Peter Buck
quote:
If we get a mid major guy who does well, he will be gone in a few years
that's a loser mentality and there's simply no way to know that. You're basically saying let's hang on to fox and get those 18-20 wins and an NIT bid because heaven forbid we get someone really good in here who will just bolt soon after.
If someone does as well as you're talking about, good enough to where they leave in 3 years, it means we've at the very least MADE the tourney and in all likelihood won a game or 2 when there. It is also likely that he will have gotten a high profile recruit or 2. If that were the case and he bolted, we'd be no less attractive of a job than we are now. A guy doing so well that he leaves for something better in 3 years would be a fantastic problem to have I'd think.
And on the flip side, if the guy is a career mid-major dude and is doing well in the SEC and making $2M a year, it's not set in stone he'd automatically leave.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 4:26 pm to WG_Dawg
It's not a loser mentality at all and has nothing to do with Fox. It is a simple reality and it has historical foundation. We need to do more than just hire a hot up and comer if we want the program to truly mature to the next level and hold.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 4:58 pm to Peter Buck
quote:
We need to do more than just hire a hot up and comer if we want the program to truly mature to the next level and hold.
Define do more? What is the recommendation if hiring a hot coach isn't at the very least part of the answer.
With our current AD, we *know* that hiring an established P5 coach that would truly be game changing is not on the table... we're not going to pay 3.5-4 mill a season in year one just to have that creep up over time - which is ultimately what it would take to hire away a high quality P5 HC (if that would even do it). It needs to be a systematic process of building on success... Fox has had incremental success, but none of it at the scale that merited significant increased investment in the program. KCP only at UGA for 2 years was great for the time, but tough to build momentum on. Only one tournament berth in the last several years and no wins doesn't exactly give you momentum to capitalize on either.
If you hire the hot mid-major coach and offer a competitive salary maybe with some pretty enticing accelerators for tournament wins... you could conceivably make the situation very desirable. Be transparent. Have early discussions on the reality of the current venue and set guidelines on what level of success (both on court and fan engagement) might merit re-evaluating a facility change... I will agree with you that *just* hiring a new coach does not necessarily change the program, but it can be the catalyst. Also, I feel like there isn't as much drive to *get* students and locals to basketball games from what I hear (not in Athens anymore so can't speak from personal experience). During the Harrick days, there was a metric shite ton of student and local marketing to get people to attend, and the crowds were generally quite good. Athens is tricky as far as attendance goes, as getting to games during the week from Atlanta (where the largest chunk of the alumni base lives) is brutal if not impossible, so you're counting on local area support to fill those games up. Weekend games tend to have pretty good attendance from what I've seen.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 5:22 pm to fibonaccisquared
For reference, here are the Attendance Numbers:
If you could get UGA consistently in the 8,500-9,000 range as seen in 01-03, and couple that with some on court success (1st round win would be a hell of a start) you have some real momentum to sell program changes on. That attendance volume would be good for 40-55th annually, and it's only 80-85% capacity in Stegeman. You're almost never going to be top 40, simply due to Stegeman's capacity maxing out at 10,523... but you don't *need* to. The atmosphere changes dramatically when we're averaging 8500-9000... Florida operates on about 83-85% capacity in a similar sized venue (10,100 or so) and no one criticizes their atmosphere/crowd.
You can even see the carry over excitement from Harrick to Felton... so in the instance that a coach comes in for 3-4 years and then bolts, it's not like the fans just stop coming automatically...
Also, can we just take a moment to recognize that Harrick had a season with nearly 94% capacity average at Stegeman... before any meaningful renovations.
quote:
(edited: A little unclear on the NCAA website but I *think* these values are based on the year the season *finished* but left 99 in just in case)
99 94. Georgia 16 93,442 5,840
Harrick 1999-2003
00 77. Georgia 13 88,102 6,777
01 64. Georgia 12 96,310 8,026
02 48. Georgia 13 117,834 9,064
03 44. Georgia 13 128,146 9,857
Felton 2004-2008
04 58. Georgia 16 137,902 8,619
05 87. Georgia 16 99,074 6,192
06 73. Georgia 14 99,613 7,115
07 74. Georgia 18 132,048 7,336
08 72. Georgia 16 125,172 7,823
09 81. Georgia 18 120,602 6,700
Fox - 2009-2017
10 79. Georgia 16 109,348 6,834
11 60. Georgia 16 131,998 8,250
12 74. Georgia 17 120,350 7,079
13 89. Georgia 18 111,571 6,198
14 84. Georgia 18 110,512 6,140
15 64. Georgia 16 120,270 7,517
16 65. Georgia 19 139,570 7,345
If you could get UGA consistently in the 8,500-9,000 range as seen in 01-03, and couple that with some on court success (1st round win would be a hell of a start) you have some real momentum to sell program changes on. That attendance volume would be good for 40-55th annually, and it's only 80-85% capacity in Stegeman. You're almost never going to be top 40, simply due to Stegeman's capacity maxing out at 10,523... but you don't *need* to. The atmosphere changes dramatically when we're averaging 8500-9000... Florida operates on about 83-85% capacity in a similar sized venue (10,100 or so) and no one criticizes their atmosphere/crowd.
You can even see the carry over excitement from Harrick to Felton... so in the instance that a coach comes in for 3-4 years and then bolts, it's not like the fans just stop coming automatically...
Also, can we just take a moment to recognize that Harrick had a season with nearly 94% capacity average at Stegeman... before any meaningful renovations.
This post was edited on 3/8/17 at 5:31 pm
Posted on 3/8/17 at 5:42 pm to fibonaccisquared
That's the thing... UGA is playing good basketball now. Not seeing the marketing we used to see. Maybe it's there and not working. Not saying a new guy won't stir something up, but we are playing good basketball now and the fan support does not correlate. I just don't feel like I'm seeing anything huge being done for the team other than McGarity saying he promises not to fire the coach most likely...
Posted on 3/8/17 at 5:53 pm to Peter Buck
And that's exactly why we wouldn't get a good up and coming coach imo.
The program is just not a desirable job right now. There is nothing here to draw a good coach. He'll, somebody posted an article from when we fired Felton and they listed 5 names that were supposedly targets. Fox wasn't even on the list.
The fox haters can't see the forest for the trees. It's a systemic problem. Chopping off a branch won't fix it.
We need a major attitude shift with the administration, board, or whoever is behind this lackadaisical approach to competitive sports.
The program is just not a desirable job right now. There is nothing here to draw a good coach. He'll, somebody posted an article from when we fired Felton and they listed 5 names that were supposedly targets. Fox wasn't even on the list.
The fox haters can't see the forest for the trees. It's a systemic problem. Chopping off a branch won't fix it.
We need a major attitude shift with the administration, board, or whoever is behind this lackadaisical approach to competitive sports.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 6:03 pm to Peter Buck
We haven't played exciting basketball though, which is why I don't think we've seen good attendance/support. We're #281 in 3-pt percentage, we didn't really run the floor a lot, our defense wasn't that impressive, etc. Having a slower offense that plays through a post player just isn't going to bring in average fans in droves.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 7:16 pm to K9
Nah, bro. All you have to do is fire the coach and the program will instantly turn around.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 7:26 pm to Barstools
Some people really believe that.
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News