Started By
Message

re: Dawgs 35 | Tigers 38 | 4th QT

Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:00 pm to
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
70658 posts
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:00 pm to
quote:

Thi loss falls entirely on the O line. They did a horrible job at protecting Murray and opening holes. The refs were also all acc biast also.


You score 35 and still lose, how is that the offense fault? This is Willy Martinez shite.
Posted by Brick67
Member since Oct 2012
1409 posts
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:01 pm to
FWIW,we lost at the O-line IMO. Clemson's D had too much success getting pressure on AM and knocked us off offensively just enough to pull it out. D looked better than I thought they would but suspensions hurt us and losing Mitchell hurt too. Also saw a lot of hit-tackling vs wrapping up. Couple of Clemson's 2d effort gouges were due to trying to hit rather than tackle.
This post was edited on 8/31/13 at 11:03 pm
Posted by JacketFan77
Tiger, GA
Member since Nov 2012
2562 posts
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:02 pm to
Richt should have called CPJ.
Posted by DawgNation2012
Canton, GA
Member since Sep 2012
817 posts
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:04 pm to
Deeprig you idiot with out the oline protecting Murray we do not continue drives and score points. They lost us this game.
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
16977 posts
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:04 pm to
We had six series in a roe that were either picks turnovers or punts..how is that on the defense against a suspect Clemson D?
Posted by dawgdayafternoon
Jacksonville, GA
Member since Jul 2011
22993 posts
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

You score 35 and still lose, how is that the offense fault? This is Willy Martinez shite.

I agree to an extent.

The offense and special teams should have scored more. The defense couldn't make a play in the 2nd half when we needed it the most. This was a complete team loss.

Grantham still hasn't proven that he can stop a competent offense despite having loads of talent at his disposal.
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
42130 posts
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:07 pm to
Logging off befote I get permananned.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
70658 posts
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:07 pm to
35 points scored.

Defense gave up 38.


Yeah, lets blame the offense.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
70658 posts
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

Grantham still hasn't proven that he can stop a competent offense despite having loads of talent at his disposal.


Yes. Exactly.
Posted by Brick67
Member since Oct 2012
1409 posts
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:13 pm to
Can't completely disagree with Deeprig either. We knew both defenses were suspect and both O's would have to win this for each team. We couldn't tackle effectively and they converted. Still don't understand why TEs didn't get more looks. Seems like when we have success going to them, the whole thing opens up and we're almost unstoppable. Yet again Bobo is too predictabe with the run up the middle.
Posted by ncdawg
Tampa
Member since Sep 2012
1109 posts
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:22 pm to
I found myself wondering why we were reluctant to throw the ball to the slot receiver in the flats like we did so often last year. Would have been a great way to take advantage of Clemson putting 8 or 9 in the box most of the night. Also would have gotten the ball out of Murray's hands a little faster and negate the pass rush a little.
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
42130 posts
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:23 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/31/13 at 11:24 pm
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 8/31/13 at 11:25 pm to
quote:

You score 35 and still lose, how is that the offense fault? This is Willy Martinez shite.


Most predicted this would be a shoot-out and to a large extent is was. With a rebuilt defense I figured the offense might have to score 50 or more points to win. Turns out they just needed to score in the forties and couldn't get it done. Bottom line: Clemson's defense is better than our defense and our OL is once again a weakness for a Richt team. We lost this game at the LOS and both sides of the ball. What is amazing is as it turns out, that one blown snap on that close FG attempt became the difference in the game.
Posted by Brick67
Member since Oct 2012
1409 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 8:44 am to
quote:

What is amazing is as it turns out, that one blown snap on that close FG attempt became the difference in the game.


That and the Murray fumble leading to a TD. One bright spot: How 'bout Q. Hicks!!! Dude is a bowling ball of death! LOL.
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
25248 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 9:11 am to
Still hurts the morning after
Posted by dhuck20
SCLSU Fan
Member since Oct 2012
22025 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 9:16 am to
quote:

35 points scored.

Defense gave up 38.


Yeah, lets blame the offense.

Offense and Defense share this loss equally. (Along with N. Theus ) but with all those fresh faces on D, I thought they played OK, and we were still in a position to win. Can't really blame any one over the other
Jump to page
Page First 22 23 24
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 24 of 24Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter