Started By
Message

re: Common theme I'm hearing about the CFB Playoff rankings

Posted on 11/1/17 at 10:12 am to
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 11/1/17 at 10:12 am to
quote:

If the roles are reversed and we lose to Bama, we will be out, assuming there are a few more 1 loss teams. But Bama losing to us and being their only loss, they still will get in over other 1 loss teams if needed. Bama will get the benefit of the doubt, and we won't. It has been proven time and time again. It shouldn't be like that, but I can see it going down like that depending on who those other 1 loss teams were.

That's all fine and good, but this doesn't support your hypothesis... in no way does placing Bama at 2 "protect them"... Placing them at 1 would protect them for the exact reason that I laid out and that others have now echoed. Protection is created by being ranked higher... more room to fall without falling out.

Independent of that...

The problem for Bama (if you want to call it that) is if they really beat the hell out of LSU this week (highly probable), currently at 19, there's a good chance they fall out of the top 25. So they may still have zero wins over currently top 25 CFP teams when the rankings are released next week. If we both end up beating Auburn, another team that may fall out or toward the bottom of the top 25 at the least with 4 losses. They have very little resume "upside". The 2 best teams they'll play, we also play(ed). LSU and Texas A&M (who would normally be "quality wins") both beat Florida but by no means were they convincing wins, so there is a little wind out of the sails on both of those teams.

If we continue to blow out East teams, and ND continues to win, we've actually got some slight leverage where a really close game in the SECCG could actually keep us in were we to come out on the losing end. If we lose by more than a possession, likely nothing resume wise could overcome that anyways. Same would go for Bama honestly. They simply don't have the resume to warrant taking over a bunch of one loss conference champions if they lose the SECCG.

My gut says they'd get in if they lose anyways, but there are people (Booger McFarland for one) already speculating that UGA might get the benefit of the doubt because of the ND win while Bama might not due to their resume this year (FSU cliff diving this year is costing them pretty significantly). One thing is for certain... I would not want to be LSU this week...
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 11/1/17 at 10:21 am to
quote:

Gambling lines with Alabama are misleading a lot like the Colts in the old Peyton Manning days. People don't feel comfortable betting against Bama regardless of the spread, just like people didn't feel comfortable betting against Peyton Manning back in the day.

People often misunderstand gambling lines anyways... it's not necessarily a predictor of what the believed outcome would be, but rather what does it take to induce bets on both sides in a reasonably even way, so that Vegas mitigates risk and "wins" on the vig. That has more to do with public perception than anything.
Posted by AlaCowboy
North Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
6942 posts
Posted on 11/1/17 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

There is no way in hell the committee would put ND in the CFP over Georgia with a head to head loss and one less win overall.


Wrong. The CFP and the NCAA want ND there. They set the criteria for bowl games and playoff selection to give the edge. 25% of Americans are Catholic. The TV audience for their playoff games would be enormous.
Posted by AllDawgCK
Athens
Member since Oct 2017
2276 posts
Posted on 11/1/17 at 12:10 pm to
I don't see how you can say 25% of Americans will be watching. I'm a Christian and I don't care to watch TCU for example. We just need to unMarkRicht ourself and win this darn thing.
Posted by lewis and herschel
Member since Nov 2009
11363 posts
Posted on 11/1/17 at 12:37 pm to
Thought watching the UT game that both us and Bama have played that we looked far better.

Vandy, they looked better but feel they were more motivated than us...
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter