Started By
Message
re: New OC Melt Thread
Posted on 1/8/16 at 9:57 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
Posted on 1/8/16 at 9:57 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
I know you're talking Franklin, but I agree with you regardless of OC.
Mazzone Run / Pass
'15: 459 (47.4%) / 510 (52.6%)
'14: 557 (56.6%) / 435 (43.4%)
'13: 566 (59.2%) / 390 (40.8%)
Looks like we will be running the ball this year.
Mazzone Run / Pass
'15: 459 (47.4%) / 510 (52.6%)
'14: 557 (56.6%) / 435 (43.4%)
'13: 566 (59.2%) / 390 (40.8%)
Looks like we will be running the ball this year.
1
Posted on 1/8/16 at 10:02 am to Farmer1906
Yeah I did quick math in my head looking at the stats from Franklins offenses at Cal and La Tech and it was like 55-60 pass. That would put a ton of pressure on Hubenak or Knight.
And again I don't think a dink and dunk air raid can be that successful in this conference with the athletes at LB and the secondary. You need to be able to hit the deep ball like Goff and Manziel could
Neither guy excites me a lot but I think to win games right now Mazzone's offense would be better
And again I don't think a dink and dunk air raid can be that successful in this conference with the athletes at LB and the secondary. You need to be able to hit the deep ball like Goff and Manziel could
Neither guy excites me a lot but I think to win games right now Mazzone's offense would be better
This post was edited on 1/8/16 at 10:04 am
Posted on 1/8/16 at 10:07 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
I know UCLA threw a ton of passes behind the line of scrimmage though, someone had posted an article from Roto with the stat. So that's concerning as well
Posted on 1/8/16 at 10:10 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
You need to be able to catch the jump ball like Mike Evans could
Posted on 1/8/16 at 10:11 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
I know UCLA threw a ton of passes behind the line of scrimmage though, someone had posted an article from Roto with the stat. So that's concerning as well
Yes and no. We need to be able to use the horizontal pass effectively. Almost all spread offenses do. We just need to not be predictable and it needs to go to Speedy, Kirk, and those types not Carson.
Posted on 1/8/16 at 10:11 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
Someone posted that Mazzone would definitely develop the TE
Posted on 1/8/16 at 10:17 am to Old Sarge
Thomas Duarte was a hybrid WR/TE. He went for 53-872-10 last year.
This post was edited on 1/8/16 at 10:17 am
Posted on 1/8/16 at 10:21 am to Farmer1906
It's official
Mazzone and son are in
Mazzone and son are in
This post was edited on 1/8/16 at 10:22 am
Posted on 1/8/16 at 10:22 am to Old Sarge
My God look at Texags furiously polish this turd
quote:Yeah, so low that Auburn was ranked #14 the year they replaced Mazzone with Petrino
True, Mazzone also had some mundane starts at Auburn and Ole Miss, but their talent level was quite low then.
This post was edited on 1/8/16 at 10:25 am
Posted on 1/8/16 at 10:24 am to Iosh
It's not a home run
But it's not a bad hire either
Probably the best we could hope for
But it's not a bad hire either
Probably the best we could hope for
Posted on 1/8/16 at 10:28 am to Old Sarge
quote:
Probably the best we could hope for
Agreed. I'm only disappointed because I felt like we needed a home run. Well see how it plays out.
Posted on 1/8/16 at 10:43 am to Pitch To Johnny
Not a home run hire, feels like an in the gap double or so. At this point, let's just see what happens.
Posted on 1/8/16 at 10:43 am to Old Sarge
After all this drama I am just relieved it's over.
I thought it felt bad having Mazzone as the OC, but the concept that we would be rejected by Mazzone to be our OC felt worse.
I thought it felt bad having Mazzone as the OC, but the concept that we would be rejected by Mazzone to be our OC felt worse.
Posted on 1/8/16 at 10:44 am to Iosh
Yeah those Auburn offenses were nasty once Petrino took over. He's one of the best ever but there was a lot of talent
I agree, we were incredibly predictable with it under Spav. The number for Mazzone was really high, like 33%. Hopefully we at least vary it and use things like the tunnel screen that Spav never used, and use Kirk more out of the backfield
quote:
Yes and no. We need to be able to use the horizontal pass effectively. Almost all spread offenses do. We just need to not be predictable and it needs to go to Speedy, Kirk, and those types not Carson.
I agree, we were incredibly predictable with it under Spav. The number for Mazzone was really high, like 33%. Hopefully we at least vary it and use things like the tunnel screen that Spav never used, and use Kirk more out of the backfield
This post was edited on 1/8/16 at 10:45 am
Posted on 1/8/16 at 10:54 am to Old Sarge
quote:
Mazzone and son are in
What about Adrian Klemm, the killer recruiter? He's the only one of the bunch I wanted.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 10:53 pm to cardboardboxer
This post was edited on 10/11/16 at 10:55 pm
Posted on 10/12/16 at 6:18 am to CajunTiger_225
quote:
Les won't be getting fired next year. LSU is going to field a very solid team next year he won't be able to frick it up. He can lose two or even 3(close games) and still get another year with this recruiting class and honestly I only see us losing two.
Posted on 10/12/16 at 6:21 am to Old Sarge
Posted on 10/12/16 at 6:25 am to Howdyagssec
I love this thread, it's FULL of me being right 
Posted on 10/12/16 at 9:21 am to Old Sarge
6th in Total Offense (1st in SEC), 21st in Scoring Offense (3rd in SEC) thus far. Maybe it wasn't a horrible (double-play like) hire.
Page 11 of 13
Latest Texas A&M News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News