Started By
Message
Posted on 6/14/16 at 7:35 pm to Chill98
Crystal balled toward tsips with offers from sips, OU, LSU, Mizzou
Posted on 6/14/16 at 9:13 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
Crystal balled toward tsips with offers from sips, OU, LSU, Mizzou
It's pretty ridiculous how they automatically crystal ball every player in the state to the Sips that have an offer from that team. Nice little operation they got going on at 247 to bump up subscriptions, just like they keep bumping up the Sip recruits ratings before signing day.
Posted on 6/14/16 at 9:14 pm to Old Sarge
Jack Sears, 4* QB from CA, was apparently in town.
Posted on 6/14/16 at 9:27 pm to Old Sarge
I'm just teasin'...sort of.
Posted on 6/15/16 at 11:33 am to Old Sarge
New RB commit from LA has a high debut ranking in the ESPN 300
Posted on 6/15/16 at 11:50 am to swaggyp
So we can laugh now at all of the "he's only a 3 star" posters
He's the 117th ranked player in the nation, 4th or 5th star coming soon

He's the 117th ranked player in the nation, 4th or 5th star coming soon

Posted on 6/15/16 at 12:55 pm to Chill98
quote:
Look into the #s of the 2016 recruiting class:
ESPN
Sips: 13-4* recruits and 11-3* recruits (I believe 3, including Erick Fowler, won't make it on campus).
A&M: 14-4* recruits and 7-3* recruits
The Sips literally had just 3 more 3*s recruits and 1 less 4* and this board went absolutely "bat $%*# crazy", because their "Ranking" was higher.
Where did you come up with these numbers?
247 composite ranking shows A&M with 8 4-stars and 13 3-stars
Posted on 6/15/16 at 1:11 pm to NanosTacoRun
I would guess ESPN because it says ESPN.
Posted on 6/15/16 at 3:55 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
So we can laugh now at all of the "he's only a 3 star" posters
There are two kinds of 3 stars.
There are the 3 stars you target early in the process as "wants" because you scouted them and their size, build, measurables, attitude, and skill set fit with your scheme at a position of need.
There are 3 stars you take late in the process because you struck on out who you wanted and you now have to take the best player still available to fill a roster spot at a position of need or be left without depth in the future.
Totally different. In the first case, everyone needs to shut up and be happy that the staff got who they wanted based on their scouting and their criteria. In the second case, it's a bad sign - we're getting beat, we're picking up scraps, and will suffer for it.
Posted on 6/15/16 at 4:12 pm to Cooter Davenport
Well its June so I think we're in the former.
Posted on 6/15/16 at 4:18 pm to Farmer1906
Yeah cutoff has to be after their senior season I assume.
Posted on 6/15/16 at 4:22 pm to cardboardboxer
Yep, so do we ban the 3star nazis until December? 

Posted on 6/15/16 at 4:34 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
Well its June so I think we're in the former.
I think you also have to consider the amount for exposure each kid has received prior to the ranking.
If someone is at a powerhouse program that had a bunch of highly rated kids in the previous class, I'd trust the ranking more than someone at a smaller school who probably hasn't been given a thorough evaluation.
Posted on 6/15/16 at 4:58 pm to NanosTacoRun
You mean the powerhouse kid rated at 3 star has less odds of being a future 4 star right?
Posted on 6/15/16 at 5:19 pm to NanosTacoRun
Travis Etienne is now listed as the 12th best RB and 117# player in the nation overall (4*)!!!
Latest Texas A&M News
Popular
Back to top
