Started By
Message
2
Posted on 6/7/12 at 7:09 pm to Big Bam
Def Do WANT!!!! 
Posted on 6/7/12 at 7:10 pm to Big Bam
BOL crew seems to be dragging lately... Most of the initial info has been coming from other 247 guys.
Posted on 6/7/12 at 7:13 pm to TideSaint
They love those 3 star qbs down in br
Posted on 6/7/12 at 7:19 pm to ApeDeuce
Are you telling me TD's Bama recruiting MEGA thread is the BEST SOURCE?? IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE TELLING ME APE?
Posted on 6/7/12 at 7:20 pm to BuccWildBammer
Posted on 6/7/12 at 7:22 pm to BuccWildBammer
quote:
Are you telling me TD's Bama recruiting MEGA thread is the BEST SOURCE?? IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE TELLING ME APE?
Indeed... I think that's quite BOOM! worthy!
This post was edited on 6/7/12 at 7:22 pm
Posted on 6/7/12 at 7:30 pm to ApeDeuce
Aaron Murray awesomeness:
Posted on 6/7/12 at 7:34 pm to BuccWildBammer
Posted on 6/7/12 at 7:35 pm to BuccWildBammer
I'm a big fan of Murray. Kid knows how how to get it in.
Posted on 6/7/12 at 7:36 pm to BuccWildBammer
Posted on 6/7/12 at 7:37 pm to TreyAnastasio
Charles Power
quote:
We continue to hear very good things on Smith, but there's nothing official per his dad Maurice Smith, Sr. We'll keep you guys updated.
Posted on 6/7/12 at 7:37 pm to TreyAnastasio
No word from Bone either regarding Smith.
Posted on 6/7/12 at 7:42 pm to TideSaint
they all scrambling saying we blew this one
Bone is calling Laura now and saying please help me 8)
Bone is calling Laura now and saying please help me 8)
Posted on 6/7/12 at 7:45 pm to TideWarrior
Suspicious activity from 247...
Posted on 6/7/12 at 7:52 pm to TideWarrior
And Laura is showing her boobs on skype to some 16yo in texas who has the scoop.
Posted on 6/7/12 at 7:55 pm to TideWarrior
I keep seeing people talking about recruiting services vs another one. This is a simple look at my evaluation of how they rank players.
So for you recruiting service junkies here is a comparison between Rivals and ESPN and their loyality to their games they sponser in regards to how they rank players.
Rivals sponsors the Army All American Game
ESPN sponsors the Under Armor All American Game
Rivals 2012 top 25
65% of their top 25 played in the Army game of those 75% were not in ESPN top 25
35% of their top 25 played in the Under Armor game of those 89% were in ESPN top 25
ESPN 2012 top 25
72% of their top 25 played in the Under Armor game of those 56% were not in the Rivals top 25
28% of their top 25 played in the Arny game of those 57% were ranked in the top 25
There is also a 52% chance if one service ranks you in the top 25 the other will not.
These rankings were final rankings prior to the Jan games. Alot of these players moved up in the ranking after they accepted their invite to a game.
So my point is that both of these services seem to rank players based on them accepting invites to play in their sponsored games. ESPN seems to be a little more biased than Rivals but both can not be that far apart of their rankings, unless the ranking is not based on evaluations but inflating their rankings to make their All American game seem to have the better talent. Watch for Scout to do the same now that they are linked to the Semper Fi game. Maybe 247 will be the only one without a bias since they have no tie to ALL American games yet.
So for you recruiting service junkies here is a comparison between Rivals and ESPN and their loyality to their games they sponser in regards to how they rank players.
Rivals sponsors the Army All American Game
ESPN sponsors the Under Armor All American Game
Rivals 2012 top 25
65% of their top 25 played in the Army game of those 75% were not in ESPN top 25
35% of their top 25 played in the Under Armor game of those 89% were in ESPN top 25
ESPN 2012 top 25
72% of their top 25 played in the Under Armor game of those 56% were not in the Rivals top 25
28% of their top 25 played in the Arny game of those 57% were ranked in the top 25
There is also a 52% chance if one service ranks you in the top 25 the other will not.
These rankings were final rankings prior to the Jan games. Alot of these players moved up in the ranking after they accepted their invite to a game.
So my point is that both of these services seem to rank players based on them accepting invites to play in their sponsored games. ESPN seems to be a little more biased than Rivals but both can not be that far apart of their rankings, unless the ranking is not based on evaluations but inflating their rankings to make their All American game seem to have the better talent. Watch for Scout to do the same now that they are linked to the Semper Fi game. Maybe 247 will be the only one without a bias since they have no tie to ALL American games yet.
Posted on 6/7/12 at 7:59 pm to TideWarrior
quote:
So my point is that both of these services seem to rank players based on them accepting invites to play in their sponsored games.
Good stuff bro!
Posted on 6/7/12 at 8:03 pm to chilld28
It's coming from this guy:
And he is a reporter for OU and accredited for 247
quote:
James Hale8159 posts
(Copyright by James Hale and OUInsider.com)
And he is a reporter for OU and accredited for 247
Posted on 6/7/12 at 8:05 pm to TideWarrior
quote:
So my point is that both of these services seem to rank players based on them accepting invites to play in their sponsored games
nothing is sacred. everyone has an agenda
Page 823 of 1058
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News