Started By
Message
re: Worst SEC Ref Calls GIFs
Posted on 8/26/21 at 9:38 pm to bstew3006
Posted on 8/26/21 at 9:38 pm to bstew3006
quote:
Have you not looked at his zoomed marked up pics?
Yes and you are biased and blind
quote:
His zoomed marked up pics show more evidence of possession in bounds than JJ touching the ball lol.
Again you are biased and a still shot does not deem controlled possession.
1
Posted on 8/26/21 at 9:38 pm to bstew3006
quote:
His zoomed
JJ GOAT
Posted on 8/26/21 at 9:39 pm to Tuscaloosa
Posted on 8/26/21 at 9:41 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Yes and you are biased and blind
quote:
Again you are biased and a still shot does not deem controlled possession.
Bc I said there isn’t definitive evidence? Odd
quote:
There is no definitive proof either way,
This post was edited on 8/26/21 at 9:48 pm
Posted on 8/26/21 at 9:50 pm to bstew3006
Do you not understand why call on the field stands? I’m not sure why y’all continue to argue this. Just like the 2006 Auburn game interception reversal. Read the rule book.
Argue with the rules not the call.
ETA I do find it quite hilarious you do not acknowledge your complete bias of the view
Argue with the rules not the call.
ETA I do find it quite hilarious you do not acknowledge your complete bias of the view
This post was edited on 8/26/21 at 9:52 pm
Posted on 8/26/21 at 9:53 pm to TailbackU
You win
Posted on 8/26/21 at 10:02 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
ETA I do find it quite hilarious you do not acknowledge your complete bias of the view
Do ya?
Now, you stated their wasn't definitive evidence either way.
But you’re laughing at me stating there isn’t definitive evidence either way on his claim, which also wasn't part of the ruling…
Your claim on my bias is accurate on it being an interception. Not JJ finger tips touching the ball
This post was edited on 8/26/21 at 10:06 pm
Posted on 8/26/21 at 10:04 pm to Nitro Express
quote:
They'll never admit it. They also won't admit they weren't going to win the game either way.
Yeah, Alabama only got 3 points on the drive.
LSU got the ball back and threw an interception.
Posted on 8/26/21 at 10:06 pm to bstew3006
quote:
Thank you for clearly showing pics of PP having both feet inbounds, both hands CLEARLY on the ball and making the interception.
Those are all before he had his feet down, which is the point because Julio is touching the ball in all of them.
But you obviously just don't want to admit it no matter what, so...
Posted on 8/26/21 at 10:16 pm to bstew3006
quote:
Now, you stated their wasn't definitive evidence either way.
Yes so call on the field stands. These are rules
quote:. What?
But you’re laughing at me stating there isn’t definitive evidence either way on his claim, which also wasn't part of the ruling…
quote:
Your claim on my bias is accurate on it being an interception. Not JJ finger tips touching the ball
Didn’t you just acknowledge there was no definitive proof?
Posted on 8/26/21 at 10:20 pm to 3down10
quote:
LSU got the ball back and threw an interception.
They had 9 yards total offense during the entire 4th quarter.
Posted on 8/26/21 at 10:21 pm to 3down10
In none of those pics you show are Julio's feet oob
Posted on 8/26/21 at 10:26 pm to jb21lsu
Eh it honestly seemed like an int, but I seriously doubt it matters. LSU could not move the ball.
Posted on 8/26/21 at 10:53 pm to macjonesgoat
You are the worst.
Posted on 8/26/21 at 11:03 pm to macjonesgoat
Posted on 8/26/21 at 11:21 pm to Tuscaloosa
LSU had the 77th ranked offense and one of the worst of the Les Mile's era, and that is saying something. Their previous drive was a 3 and out which went for negative 8 yards. Their drive after this was an int. Who cares if it was an int? LSU scored once in the second half and they were lucky to get that.
Posted on 8/26/21 at 11:29 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
quote:
Would've been nullified anyhow because 2 Bama players committed false starts.
Bama scored a TD on a play where a receiver false started and it was never called. They weren't calling false starts in this game. Just FYI
Posted on 8/26/21 at 11:36 pm to LSUTigersLJM
Julio didn’t touch it first, PP is clearly in front of Julio with both hands on the ball before Julio could’ve touched it.
Posted on 8/26/21 at 11:40 pm to FlexDawg
quote:
“Offsides”
He wasn't offsides, but to be fair it really did look like it was in real time, and a good bit of that was because he thought he was offsides and slowed down a sec.
He jumped early, but because he was further back he wasn't offside.
Hell of a jump. He didn't even need to slow down and even though he did, he still got the block.
Posted on 8/26/21 at 11:41 pm to Madking
quote:
Julio didn’t touch it first, PP is clearly in front of Julio with both hands on the ball before Julio could’ve touched it.
You do realize it's not a catch the moment it touches the receivers hands right?
Page 6 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News