Started By
Message
re: Wonky CFP committee precedent question
Posted on 12/1/25 at 2:01 pm to ukraine_rebel
Posted on 12/1/25 at 2:01 pm to ukraine_rebel
If Bama wins by 30, Jawja is sadly out
0
Posted on 12/1/25 at 2:04 pm to Violent Hip Swivel
quote:
it will not drop a team playing in a conference championship game beneath a team that is not playing in its conference title game.
Nor should it. If it does, then that's the end of conference title games. Which points to the fact a college playoff is a F'n bad idea.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 2:09 pm to Sl0thstronautEsq
quote:
The last time KDB rematched with a team in the CCG things worked out pretty well
PAC 10 football, baby!!!
Posted on 12/1/25 at 2:13 pm to twk
would be hard for Bama to end up ahead of UGA.
You’re over thinking this, even the committee isn’t this dumb. A two loss uga(both losses to bama) will not be ranked ahead of 2 loss sec champ bama. That’s stupid.
You’re over thinking this, even the committee isn’t this dumb. A two loss uga(both losses to bama) will not be ranked ahead of 2 loss sec champ bama. That’s stupid.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 3:11 pm to Violent Hip Swivel
quote:
PAC 10 football, baby!!!
Against a Kirby disciple, baby!!!
Posted on 12/1/25 at 3:16 pm to twk
BYU will lose by 20 plus
Posted on 12/1/25 at 3:38 pm to Violent Hip Swivel
The committee is there to ensure the "right" teams get into the playoff, not necessarily the best teams.
Blue bloods and brand names will be given every advantage. They will forget Bama got body-slammed by Florida State, and that ND lost to the Canes and the Aggies.
And they will explain it all away shamelessly.
Blue bloods and brand names will be given every advantage. They will forget Bama got body-slammed by Florida State, and that ND lost to the Canes and the Aggies.
And they will explain it all away shamelessly.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 3:41 pm to Violent Hip Swivel
That should probably read :
it will not drop a team playing in a conference championship game beneath a team that is not playing in its conference title game unless the committee wants to.
it will not drop a team playing in a conference championship game beneath a team that is not playing in its conference title game unless the committee wants to.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 3:45 pm to Violent Hip Swivel
Simply Untrue. SMU played in the ACC championship game last year and lost to Clemson. They dropped below Indiana who did not play in the Big 10 championship game.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 3:59 pm to Violent Hip Swivel
I see the point that why should the loser of the CG be dropped below others because of actually being in the CG.
Ex.:
Team A is 11-1 & in the CG.
Team B is 11-1 & not in the CG.
Team A loses the CG ending up 11-2.
Should Team B be ABOVE them by playing 1 LESS game?
Ex.:
Team A is 11-1 & in the CG.
Team B is 11-1 & not in the CG.
Team A loses the CG ending up 11-2.
Should Team B be ABOVE them by playing 1 LESS game?
This post was edited on 12/1/25 at 4:01 pm
Posted on 12/1/25 at 4:03 pm to WG_Dawg
I remember UGA beat UF & played in the SECCG where they lost & were given a lesser bowl than the Gators.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 4:05 pm to Violent Hip Swivel
This committee is the worst yet. The chair had to resign, I am guessing scandal, and they put idiots who didn't play the sport in important positions ...
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News