Started By
Message
locked post

Why the SEC is so dominant over the ACC

Posted on 6/22/11 at 11:51 am
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 6/22/11 at 11:51 am

ESPNU Top 150 Signees

YEAR ACC SEC
2006 22 50

2007 23 54

2008 33 38

2009 23 54

2010 18 56

2011 32 48

Total 151 300


NFL Picks Since 2002

SEC or ACC State

Florida 212

Georgia 101

Louisiana 84

Virginia 73

Alabama 65

South Carolina 62

North Carolina 56

Maryland 37

Tennessee 37

Mississippi 34

Arkansas 25

Kentucky 17

Massachusetts 14



LINK
Posted by UpstateCock2007
Columbia, SC
Member since Mar 2009
7738 posts
Posted on 6/22/11 at 11:53 am to


North Carolina has triple the population of South Carolina, but we have more NFL picks. Found that to be pretty interesting.
Posted by RebFeBrees
Pensacola, FL
Member since Dec 2009
13855 posts
Posted on 6/22/11 at 11:57 am to
quote:

2010 18 56




whoa-dey



Posted by Ted2010
Member since Oct 2010
38958 posts
Posted on 6/22/11 at 12:00 pm to
SEC= Swag
ACC= Lag
Posted by nuttrag
oxford
Member since Apr 2011
22 posts
Posted on 6/22/11 at 12:03 pm to
Recruits who dream of a in the NFL are much more likely to pick an SEC team over ACC team
Posted by The Nino
Member since Jan 2010
21719 posts
Posted on 6/22/11 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

Recruits who want to win are much more likely to pick an SEC team over ACC team

Posted by Damn Good Dawg
Member since Feb 2011
47325 posts
Posted on 6/22/11 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

SEC= Swag
ACC= Lag

:rimshot:
Posted by RebFeBrees
Pensacola, FL
Member since Dec 2009
13855 posts
Posted on 6/22/11 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

nuttrag



i lold at your sig
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
20948 posts
Posted on 6/22/11 at 12:14 pm to
And the fact that several of the ACC schools emphasize basketball over football. Not the case in the SEC, except for one school.
Posted by tiger perry
Member since Dec 2009
25668 posts
Posted on 6/22/11 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

2008 33 38



this is the only year the ACC was remotely close to the SEC.
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
34319 posts
Posted on 6/22/11 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

Recruits who dream of a in the NFL are much more likely to pick an SEC team over ACC team


How do you explain the recent recruiting success of Florida State and Clemson?
Posted by KajunGator
Lake Arthur, LA
Member since May 2011
7530 posts
Posted on 6/22/11 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

How do you explain the recent recruiting success of Florida State and Clemson?


Can't explain Clemson.

Florida State got help because UF had a horrible season and Meyer quit for a second time in 12 months........and Miami is still Miami.
Posted by BrooksnDunn
Daphne, AL
Member since Nov 2009
755 posts
Posted on 6/22/11 at 12:55 pm to
This post was edited on 6/22/11 at 12:58 pm
Posted by KajunGator
Lake Arthur, LA
Member since May 2011
7530 posts
Posted on 6/22/11 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

BrooksnDunn


Damn Brooks, I know you like FSU and everything, but can your avatar look any more like this guy?

Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
34319 posts
Posted on 6/22/11 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

Florida State got help because UF had a horrible season and Meyer quit for a second time in 12 months


I don't buy it as a holistic explanation. It certainly fits for last year's stellar class.

But Florida State has had 4 straight top 10 classes on rivals, dating back to 2008.

So that means that Florida State's recruiting did well despite Tebow's Heisman, despite Florida's championship in 2008, and despite getting close to another in 2009.

Clemson is a mystery. I guess this Dabo guy is just a charmer or something.

Posted by KajunGator
Lake Arthur, LA
Member since May 2011
7530 posts
Posted on 6/22/11 at 1:20 pm to
UF and FSU, the past few years, have been going back and forth with the higher recruiting class. However, it took UF's drastic decline of this past season to see the improvements FSU has been making. They have been getting great classes, so has UF. Last year, for lack of a better term, we sucked. They pulled a MUCH better class than we did. It's the ebb and flow of a sibling rivalry.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 6/22/11 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

But Florida State has had 4 straight top 10 classes on rivals, dating back to 2008


Which came the year after Bama played them in 2007. Bama brought them exposure and thus all ensuing success.
Posted by BrooksnDunn
Daphne, AL
Member since Nov 2009
755 posts
Posted on 6/22/11 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

It certainly fits for last year's stellar class.


This is only partially true. UFs lackluster season and coaching change certainly helped but...

FSU has always attracted top-level recruits and had top-level recruiting classes. The problem for last decade was that Bowden and his staff either failed to develop the talent or recruited some bad apples. They also had a tendency to recruit based on stars rather than need. The relentless and methodical approach to recruiting by CJF and his staff is night and day compared to Bowden.


Although they have dropped off lately, Miami will always get top-level talent because of their location.


As for Clemson? I have no idea - maybe they have their own Tigerettes?
This post was edited on 6/22/11 at 2:16 pm
Posted by martymcfly6531
Member since Jan 2011
489 posts
Posted on 6/22/11 at 3:11 pm to
Have any of you ever stopped to think that half of these purebreds that go to these SEC schools wouldn't have a snow ball's chance in hell of being academically eligible to play in the ACC?
Posted by tiger perry
Member since Dec 2009
25668 posts
Posted on 6/22/11 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Have any of you ever stopped to think that half of these purebreds that go to these SEC schools wouldn't have a snow ball's chance in hell of being academically eligible to play in the ACC?


Not hard for athletes to get into Clemson, Va Tech, NC State, FSU and Miami and probably Maryland.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter