Started By
Message
re: Why SEC will win case vs. LSU, according to legal expert
Posted on 9/1/26 at 10:13 am to geauxcoco
Posted on 9/1/26 at 10:13 am to geauxcoco
quote:
I love how we keep calling them former NFL pros when they never actually played one fricking down as a professional the exaggeration is hysterical
EXACTLY. And in Ole Miss case, the NCAA was the devil incarnate until they take on LSU. For the life of me, I do not understand this outrage. These players were screwed out of the opportunity every other player has been given. They were victims of the NCAA’s ineptitude, once again. They come out with these rules without considering the ramifications. Just like the calendar issue. Why are these talking heads not on the players side? They are NOT pros. It ridiculous to call them that.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 10:15 am to TrueLefty
quote:
SEC will win case vs. LSU
This isn't even a thing. There is no case involving LSU vs SEC or SEC vs LSU.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 10:17 am to jangalang
quote:
LSU pays legal fee
LSU isn't involved in any court case with the SEC. Is this difficult to understand?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 10:19 am to 4evrlsu
Who said the NCAA wasn't the devil himself? I hope you retards burn them to the ground
Posted on 9/1/26 at 10:20 am to TrueLefty
quote:
“This is just one lawyer’s opinion. In my opinion, hands down, the SEC is going to win this case. I don’t think there’s any question about it. Why? Well, like most legal questions, that could be a long answer,” lawyer Tom Mars said on the College GameDay podcast.
“But I’ll put it this way. Having dealt with the NCAA many, many times. Having handled the Chamblas case, you can see his signed jersey behind me. I totally understand how the law works in this area. But the SEC is vastly different than the NCAA when it comes to the legal claim that the plaintiffs are advancing. It is not going to be possible for them to sustain that claim.”
So he basically says the SEC will win "because I said so." He must be a member of this site, too.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 10:34 am to TrueLefty
What case is LSU listed on?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 10:53 am to TrueLefty
Why would a legal expert omit the part about the valid reason for the court rulings? The reason those class of '22 players tried to make NFL rosters is because the NCAA waited until June before passing the 5 for 5 rule. If the rule had been changed in a timely manner, the players would've known they had eligibility remaining and could've acted accordingly to use it. NCAA member institutions essentially denied them, and only them, a full season of cfb eligibility and the court said they can have it back. From a logical standpoint, it's probably the most clearcut college sports ruling in the last 10 years. The new SEC policy is just a roundabout way of subverting the courts.
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 11:51 am
Popular
Back to top

1




