Started By
Message
re: Why is Alabama scared to play Florida more often?
Posted on 5/31/12 at 12:52 pm to Tiger Authority
Posted on 5/31/12 at 12:52 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
day, I hope you move away from that shadow. I really do. You'll become more enjoyable for everyone
Same for LSU, one day
Posted on 5/31/12 at 12:52 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
Stated like a true Auburn fan.
who cares...this doesn't mean shite in the real world.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 12:53 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
haha now you're relying on your record against Alabama compared to our record against them. But yeah, you don't live vicariously through them.
LSU has fared well enough against UA in the 30 years since Coach Bryant's retirement. The Bear years were definitely a one way street though.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 12:53 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
If we are Bama's Little bro, what does that make LSU to Bama?
If you were to create an SEC hierarchy since it was founded, it would look like this:
Alabama
Tennessee
UGA/LSU
Auburn/UF
Feel free to apply the necessary family names.
This post was edited on 5/31/12 at 12:55 pm
Posted on 5/31/12 at 12:54 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
It's been fun fellow posters. Auburn, one day, I hope you move away from that shadow. I really do. You'll become more enjoyable for everyone.
Auburn has won more against Bama in my lifetime, bro. That's the only argument I need.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 12:57 pm to Waffle House
quote:
If you were to create an SEC hierarchy since it was founded, it would look like this:
Alabama
Tennessee
UGA/LSU
Auburn/UF
LSU has the H2H and winning% on UGA. If the club can tie or surpass Dawgs in conference championships I would separate the two and move LSU closer to UT.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 1:00 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
I guess your reading comprehension is blinded by fellow poster brotherly love or something.
No matter how desperately you stomp your foot, point, and proclaim that are in the right, only someone with blinders on would interpret my comments as taking credit for Alabama's victory.
The fact that I recognize Alabama's dominance of you doesn't mean I take solace or reap rewards in said dominance. I'm just stating facts.
It is pretty damn funny that you take some moral victory in our argument by claiming I achieved a moral victory based on Bama crushing LSU. Inherently flawed, and ironic, logic never ceases to entertain me.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 1:00 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
LSU has the H2H and winning% on UGA.
No they don't. UGA has LSU on Win% and SEC Championships, though they are extremely close. We have them on NCs.
(Since the SEC was founded in '33)
Posted on 5/31/12 at 1:03 pm to Waffle House
quote:
We have them on NCs.
I would only count SEC Championships in tier rankings since those are won on the field.
This post was edited on 5/31/12 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 5/31/12 at 1:07 pm to diddydirtyAubie
quote:
I would only count SEC Championships in tier rankings since those are won on the field.
OK
Alabama
Tennessee
UGA
LSU
Auburn/UF
Posted on 5/31/12 at 1:09 pm to Waffle House
quote:
No they don't. UGA has LSU on Win% and SEC Championships, though they are extremely close. We have them on NCs.
(Since the SEC was founded in '33)
On H2H LSU/UGA 16-12-1
On conference championships: UGA 12, LSU 11
On winning % LSU - 12th, UGA - 13th
On NC's, I don't know, don't really count them. LSU shared the 2011 #1. This should count, according to some of the claims posted in this conference.
It's just a judgement call man, depending onwhat variables to use, and weights of importance attached to them.
This post was edited on 5/31/12 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 5/31/12 at 1:11 pm to Tuscaloosa
Drac is the penultimate whiny-arse LSU fan.
Well done, sir. Your whiny-ness is unlimited.
Well done, sir. Your whiny-ness is unlimited.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 1:11 pm to NYCAuburn
First the non-sensicle corndog thing ya'll copied about Nebraska...now, we have no rival ???? when will these deep insults/cuts to LSU's psyche cease...please stop
morons !
morons !
Posted on 5/31/12 at 1:12 pm to tickfawtiger
Everyone fears Will Muschamp. Don't pretend that you don't.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 1:13 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
But looking at it again... objectively there really is no significant separation.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 1:13 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Scared......of losing.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 1:13 pm to diddydirtyAubie
quote:
Auburn has won more against Bama in my lifetime, bro. That's the only argument I need.
The Auburn Creed.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 1:14 pm to ThaKaptin
quote:
But UA and UT built the SEC. Literally and figuratively.
Curiously LSU had two SEC championships before UT won their first.
LSU also had 3 pre-SEC conference championships matching UT's 3.
Not to mention LSU had a national championship before UT.
From 1891-1929 LSU was at #53 in win% at 0.62941 while UT was at #54 at 0.62903.
By 1959 UT had 3 national championships to LSU's 2.
In 1979 LSU had winning records against every SEC school except Alabama and UT - only having played UT 18 times.
I think you're confusing Georgia with Georgia Tech as well.
Just because you're ignorant of LSU's history doesn't minimize it, it only means you're ignorant.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 1:14 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
LSU shared the 2011 #1
quote:
** BCS Computer Rankings as of December 4, 2011.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 1:17 pm to BamaFan89
quote:
quote:
LSU shared the 2011 #1
quote:
** BCS Computer Rankings as of December 4, 2011.
That's the official Houlgate ranking. Are you saying it doesn't count? Are you saying a bowl game affirms/denies a claimed NC? Think before you answer.
This post was edited on 5/31/12 at 1:18 pm
Popular
Back to top



0



