Started By
Message
3
Posted on 7/13/10 at 5:11 pm to gatorsimz
quote:
quote:
Florida hasn't "owned" UGA since Spurrier.
quote:
Since Spurrier UGA is 3-17 vs UF
what am i missing here....
Red and Black sunglasses
Posted on 7/13/10 at 5:14 pm to gatorsimz
Ya'll are either joking or aren't very smart and I'm not sure which. I'll let ya'll figure it out.
Posted on 7/13/10 at 5:16 pm to MenloDawg
quote:
Ya'll are either joking or aren't very smart and I'm not sure which. I'll let ya'll figure it out.
If UF hasn't dominated UGA than UGA hasn't dominated SC either.
Posted on 7/13/10 at 5:16 pm to parkjas2001
There's no rationalizing 3-17, its not overblown. Kudos to Florida fans for not starting a thread on here everyday that's titled "17-3"
Posted on 7/13/10 at 5:18 pm to theGarnetWay
Good grief 
I vastly overestimated the average IQ on the Rant.
Series since Spurrier left -- 2-6 not 3-17.
With 4 of those wins coming by 7 or fewer points.
Hence, me saying UF hasn't "owned" UGA since Spurrier.
I vastly overestimated the average IQ on the Rant.
Series since Spurrier left -- 2-6 not 3-17.
With 4 of those wins coming by 7 or fewer points.
Hence, me saying UF hasn't "owned" UGA since Spurrier.
This post was edited on 7/13/10 at 5:20 pm
Posted on 7/13/10 at 5:19 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
A 2-1 record with both of those wins coming by a combined ten points is not what I call "owning" another team. Saban had a 2-4 record against Florida coming into last year and I can't recall a single person mentioning how Florida has owned Saban throughout his coaching career.
It was Zook. It was their chance to completely turn that series back around and they managed to lose 2 games to that dumbshit. And Saban was 2-3 going into the 2008 SECCG. Now he is 3-4 and we have them in BDS this season. It's pretty even. If he was 2-8 against UF like Richt is, then yeah people probably would say Saban gets owned by UF.
Posted on 7/13/10 at 5:21 pm to MenloDawg
quote:
Series since Spurrier left -- 2-6 not 3-17.
With 4 of those wins coming by fewer than 10 points.
So since that year Spurrier left UF, SC is 1-7 vs UGA with 5 of those Dawg wins coming by 7 points or fewer. Are you willing to concede UGA hasn't dominated SC?
This post was edited on 7/13/10 at 5:22 pm
Posted on 7/13/10 at 5:22 pm to theGarnetWay
I wouldn't call what we do against SC "domination" and neither do any of the UGA fans I know 
Posted on 7/13/10 at 5:23 pm to theGarnetWay
And even then, the history between UGA-UF and UGA-USC is COMPLETELY different.
Posted on 7/13/10 at 5:25 pm to Crede15
quote:
There's no rationalizing 3-17, its not overblown
I agree and as a UGA fan will not make excuses. We need to start winning this game before we ever think about a MNC. I like Richt and think he is a good coach, but enough with the gimmicks. Start bringing your "A" game and kick some Tails. The rest will fall into place.
Posted on 7/13/10 at 5:25 pm to MenloDawg
quote:
And even then, the history between UGA-UF and UGA-USC is COMPLETELY different.
But we're not talking about history. You wanted to dismiss the Spurrier-UF vs UGA tenure. Historically yes it has been far more dominating and lopsided in the UGA-SC series. But hell we've done better vs UGA since '90 than UGA has done vs UF.
Posted on 7/13/10 at 5:26 pm to theGarnetWay
quote:
You wanted to dismiss the Spurrier-UF vs UGA tenure.
I said UF hasn't owned UGA since his tenure...indicating that UF owned UGA during the Spurrier tenure. Dismiss?
ETA: Is Spurrier vs Goff/Donnan not history since neither of the three coach either team any longer?
This post was edited on 7/13/10 at 5:28 pm
Posted on 7/13/10 at 5:28 pm to dawgfan1979
quote:
dawgfan1979
This post was edited on 7/13/10 at 5:32 pm
Posted on 7/13/10 at 5:28 pm to gatorsimz
Posted on 7/13/10 at 5:31 pm to Rohan2Reed
quote:
Rohan2Reed
Appreciate it
Posted on 7/13/10 at 5:32 pm to MenloDawg
quote:
I said UF hasn't owned UGA since his tenure...indicating that UF owned UGA during the Spurrier tenure. Dismiss?
Its hard to argue against straight up head-to-head records. I never get too distressed when SC barely beats a Wofford or a ULL because I know it'll only be remembered as a W or an L historically. And anytime someone looks up coaching records, season records or whatever. Thats all they'll see. The only ones who keep up with the "woulda, coulda, shouldas" are the losers of those close games (ie UGA to UF and SC to UGA)
Posted on 7/13/10 at 5:33 pm to Robot Santa
quote:
It was Zook. It was their chance to completely turn that series back around and they managed to lose 2 games to that dumbshit. And Saban was 2-3 going into the 2008 SECCG. Now he is 3-4 and we have them in BDS this season. It's pretty even. If he was 2-8 against UF like Richt is, then yeah people probably would say Saban gets owned by UF.
Saban's national championship winning '03 LSU team lost to a Zook coached Florida team at home by DOUBLE DIGITS. It doesn't mean jack squat. shite happens. A very small sample size of three games in which all three games were close doesn't mean anything.
Posted on 7/13/10 at 5:49 pm to MenloDawg
I like your style MenloDawg.
Cup is always half-full
Cup is always half-full
Posted on 7/13/10 at 6:02 pm to Robot Santa
it's definitely become a mental problem for them, I thought they would get past it with the big win the year UGA went to the sugar bowl, but they failed to build on that momentum and really only one because Tebow was injured and never ran it.
Page 2 of 3
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News