Started By
Message
Why doesn't the SEC consider renaming the divisions to North and South
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:37 pm
with minor adjustments to division membership?
North Division:
1) Missouri
2) Arkansas
3) Kentucky
4) Tennessee
5) South Carolina
6) Ole Miss (to atone for past transgressions as well as to reflect northern proximity to the more southern Mississippi State)
7) Florida (to reflect what Florida has become rather than geographical location)
South Division:
1) A&M
2) LSU
3) Miss State
4) Bama
5) Auburn
6) Georgia
7) Vandy (an exception made to give this division a much needed educational boost)
These minor adjustments make the divisions a bit more competitive with each other. The "North Division" upgrades talent with the additions of Arkansas and Ole Miss, while the "South Division" welcomes Georgia to the mix while weakening a bit with the addition of Vanderbilt.
North Division:
1) Missouri
2) Arkansas
3) Kentucky
4) Tennessee
5) South Carolina
6) Ole Miss (to atone for past transgressions as well as to reflect northern proximity to the more southern Mississippi State)
7) Florida (to reflect what Florida has become rather than geographical location)
South Division:
1) A&M
2) LSU
3) Miss State
4) Bama
5) Auburn
6) Georgia
7) Vandy (an exception made to give this division a much needed educational boost)
These minor adjustments make the divisions a bit more competitive with each other. The "North Division" upgrades talent with the additions of Arkansas and Ole Miss, while the "South Division" welcomes Georgia to the mix while weakening a bit with the addition of Vanderbilt.
This post was edited on 12/9/14 at 4:48 pm
44
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:38 pm to mizzoukills
You just want the North to defeat the South you piece of shite Yankee
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:38 pm to mizzoukills
Florida would love that. Everyone else - not so much.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:39 pm to mizzoukills
Big 6 has to be divided equally. It is why Auburn is not in the east and Mizzou is.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:40 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
North and South
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:41 pm to Gradual_Stroke
quote:
You just want the North to defeat the South you piece of shite Yankee
Probably will never happen with that shitty selection of teams
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:41 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
mizzoukills
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:41 pm to allin2010
quote:
Big 6 has to be divided equally. It is why Auburn is not in the east and Mizzou is.
bullshite. In this scenario, all rivalries remain intact while evening out the divisions a bit.
It's a perfect divisional realignment.
Just look at it.
This post was edited on 12/9/14 at 4:43 pm
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:42 pm to mizzoukills
I.want.to.flame.but.dat.schedule
When people think of Northern Cousin frickers - think Arkansas
When people think of Northern Cousin frickers - think Arkansas
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:42 pm to mizzoukills
This is just awful killz. Just awful
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:44 pm to roadGator
Just look at it. It makes more sense than you realize.
You may not like the divisional names, but look at the divisional membership.
Imagine the "North" with a strong Tennessee, SC, Mizzou, Arkansas, Ole Miss, and Florida...
You may not like the divisional names, but look at the divisional membership.
Imagine the "North" with a strong Tennessee, SC, Mizzou, Arkansas, Ole Miss, and Florida...
This post was edited on 12/9/14 at 4:44 pm
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:44 pm to mizzoukills
The North would be even worse than the East is now.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:45 pm to mizzoukills
So you want Ole Miss to win the division every year? Thanks.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:45 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
7) Florida (to reflect what Florida has become rather than geographical location)
It becomes clear you have not been to Gainesville.
Northern Florida is southern
Southern Florida is where all the Yankees go to retire.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:45 pm to Tiger Live2
quote:
The North would be even worse than the East is now.
Dude, y'all have stuck by the claim that Tennessee and Florida are down which is why Mizzou is winning. Perhaps that's true.
But imagine if Tennessee and Florida were back to true form and then consider a competitive Mizzou, SC, Arkansas, and Ole Miss together in one division.
That's an upgrade dear sir.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:46 pm to mizzoukills
damn Yankee.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:46 pm to DarthRebel
quote:
So you want Ole Miss to win the division every year? Thanks.
Please. Y'all can't even beat Mizzou. Mizzou owns Ole Miss in conference play as well as historically.
This post was edited on 12/9/14 at 4:47 pm
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:47 pm to mizzoukills
I've been in favor of annually realigning divisions based on the previous season's records. It makes sense. Leaving divisions as is without regard to performance is actually quite antiquated. True, you never know for sure how a team will perform the next season, but realigning the divisions makes just as much sense as leaving them the same, IMO.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:48 pm to Smalls
realignment every year? damn...that would be a nightmare to figure out.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:49 pm to Smalls
How many conferences in college or professional leagues change division members depending on perceived strength?
You say the way it is in antiquated so you must be on the cutting edge because no one else but soccer figs in Europe do anything close to what you are suggesting.
It actually makes sense only to some LSU fans.
You say the way it is in antiquated so you must be on the cutting edge because no one else but soccer figs in Europe do anything close to what you are suggesting.
It actually makes sense only to some LSU fans.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News