Started By
Message

re: Why didn’t the SEC or Big10 take the WVU ‘Eers

Posted on 9/22/22 at 8:27 pm to
Posted by RamboMizzou
Springfield
Member since Jan 2014
10203 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 8:27 pm to
I love seeing Arkansas fans plead for us to get traded out of the conference.

Guess getting that arse whooped since we’ve joined over and over again has really done a number on them phaggots.
This post was edited on 9/22/22 at 8:28 pm
Posted by ClassicCityAlum
Palm Beach, FL
Member since Mar 2019
883 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 11:43 pm to
I'm fine having Mizzou, and I don't particularly want WVU.

I just thought comparing WVU / WV to Pittsburgh / PA culture given the university's geographic proximity was misleading and erroneous.
Posted by Keith101
Member since Aug 2016
178 posts
Posted on 9/23/22 at 7:32 am to
quote:

Why didn’t the SEC or Big10 take the WVU ‘Eers

Answer: Market Size. WVA doesn't have any decent size TV markets. Missouri has St Louis & Kansas City.
Posted by Draino54
Member since Mar 2022
779 posts
Posted on 9/23/22 at 7:40 am to
I feel bad for WV fans. They are “SEC passionate” and their FB & BB teams are competitive. Mizzou admin & fans don’t seem to give a damn about winning. I’d prefer WVU over Mizzou. Not sure how interested StLouis & KC markets follow SEC football.
Posted by SRV
Banging in The Rock
Member since Nov 2021
1209 posts
Posted on 9/23/22 at 7:45 am to

Mizzou came in during the weakest time in years for the East, and during a run of inept coaches for us. Reality is now setting in for y’all.

Posted by rebelrouser
Columbia, SC
Member since Feb 2013
10651 posts
Posted on 9/23/22 at 7:46 am to
They should be in the ACC. Backyard brawl rivalry w/ Pitt, seceded from Virginia so call that a rivalry too.
Posted by Gunga Din
Oklahoma
Member since Jul 2020
1472 posts
Posted on 9/23/22 at 7:51 am to
quote:

WVU is 70 miles from Pittsburgh. There is nothing "southern" about them. The closest school to them in the conference is UK and they're over 300 miles away.



In a way, Morgantown is a lot like Fayetteville in that respect. Both are located very close to a neighboring state that is in somewhat of a different region.


Posted by RamboMizzou
Springfield
Member since Jan 2014
10203 posts
Posted on 9/23/22 at 8:16 am to
quote:

Mizzou came in during the weakest time in years for the East, and during a run of inept coaches for us. Reality is now setting in for y’all.


Both of these excuses are such bullshite.

Georgia almost beat the runner up NC in Auburn.. lost by a fluke play but somehow when Mizzou beat them “they were down”. Get the frick out of here. Mizzou and SC were both loaded in 2013.

As for beating Arkansas, you fricks aren’t a power. One of your best teams got railroaded by our 07 team.

You can type anything you want but that bullshite is so overplayed. And yeah, one win in 6 years really is a “real reality check”.
Posted by RamboMizzou
Springfield
Member since Jan 2014
10203 posts
Posted on 9/23/22 at 8:17 am to
quote:

feel bad for WV fans. They are “SEC passionate” and their FB & BB teams are competitive. Mizzou admin & fans don’t seem to give a damn about winning. I’d prefer WVU over Mizzou. Not sure how interested StLouis & KC markets follow SEC football.


Well being that Mizzou slaughtered them last time They played, this post is hilarious.

Also, you can tell you don’t have a clue about Mizzou and the KC/STL markets. Being on the border of the state, you’ll have a mixture but it’s Mizzou majority.
This post was edited on 9/23/22 at 9:27 am
Posted by TizzyT4theUofA
This side of eternity
Member since Jun 2016
10064 posts
Posted on 9/23/22 at 8:29 am to
They should be in the ACC. That’s where the majority of their rivals are.
Posted by SRV
Banging in The Rock
Member since Nov 2021
1209 posts
Posted on 9/23/22 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Mizzou and SC were both loaded in 2013. As for beating Arkansas, you fricks aren’t a power.


One of your best teams got railroaded by our 07 team.


Perhaps you misread my post. I never said that y’all haven’t had good teams. I said that you reaped the benefits of the East, as in the traditional powers of Georgia, Tennessee and Florida, being down. That is true. Good for you. We have done the same in the past.

As far as 2007 goes, that was a very good team, but this conversation is about Missouri in the SEC.

Sometimes people just share thoughts and opinions, without trying to start a pissing contest. It’s actually a real thing.

This post was edited on 9/23/22 at 10:34 am
Posted by RamboMizzou
Springfield
Member since Jan 2014
10203 posts
Posted on 9/23/22 at 10:48 am to
quote:

as in the traditional powers of Georgia, Tennessee and Florida, being down


Not true.

13 Georgia was one fluke play away from beating the #2 team in the nation in Auburn. Beat a very good SC team. Had a very good roster.

Tennessee has been down for decades? Why aren’t they brought up when another team wins the East? Oh because it fits your narrative.

13 Florida we beat the frick out of. You know why? Because we were a great team that did what they were supposed to.

We beat a ranked Ole Miss team at Ole Miss. We beat Arky. Vandy was solid under James Franklin. Barely lost in OT to SC who was equally just as stacked with NFL talent.

Just admit your wrong. We walked into 2014 but 2013, y’all stupid as frick to think the East was bad.
Posted by SRV
Banging in The Rock
Member since Nov 2021
1209 posts
Posted on 9/23/22 at 11:28 am to

Cool
Posted by Doonesbury
Austin, Texas
Member since Sep 2022
231 posts
Posted on 9/23/22 at 11:28 am to
For the SEC, it was because they were anti-slavery during the Civil War so not truly "Southern" in their eyes.

Haha, I kid?
Posted by RamboMizzou
Springfield
Member since Jan 2014
10203 posts
Posted on 9/23/22 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Cool

Lolololol
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter