Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:49 pm to LarrySellers
quote:Technically?
I guess there were never any National Champions before 1998
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:49 pm to That LSU Guy
quote:
Seeing as how they didn't play in the NC game,
HA! LSU only played cause of Pitt that year.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:49 pm to LarrySellers
LSU or Florida. Both have been dominant. 2nd tier is USC, Auburn, OU, TX, Bama.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:50 pm to LarrySellers
quote:
I guess there were never any National Champions before 1998
Because now there is an actual national championship game to determine the national champion, the AP is meaningless, unless you are a USC fan or an LSU hater.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:50 pm to LarrySellers
quote:
USC has 1.5 National Titles in that time period (unless you want to not count the '04 title with Reggie Bush). Which is the exact same as LSU. Its funny how LSU fans like to pretend they didn't split the '03 NC with USC. USC also played in the '05 NC where they lost a thriller to TX
When you say "you", do you mean the NCAA?
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:51 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
Let's open another can of worms....was Aunbuns 2004 win over LSU controversial in any way...I get the years with asterisks mixed up and my intern is at lunch.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:51 pm to beaverfever
quote:
LSU or Florida. Both have been dominant. 2nd tier is USC, Auburn, OU, TX, Bama.
not Bama, we dont belong on that list. If it were the last 5 years then yes, but not since 2000 we had some HORRIBLE years
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:51 pm to That LSU Guy
quote:
Seeing as how they didn't play in the NC game, survey says...
I like subjective conclusions instead of objective ones.
All any team can do is win every game they play in. I guess that using a voting system to determine the best two teams in the country is funny.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:52 pm to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
LSU is the only champ in '03 as far as I'm concerned. The AP nonsense was just a continuation of the media fellating of the Trojans
Glad to see at least one Bama fan making sense.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:52 pm to parkjas2001
quote:AND..... the beat down of VaTech.
HA! LSU only played cause of Pitt that year.
But they still PLAYED, AND WON!
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:52 pm to Crow Pie
quote:
was Aunbuns 2004 win over LSU controversial in any way
No, Auburns win over LSUwho was not.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:53 pm to Crow Pie
And I see how you're wanting to take this thread.
*Adds to ignore from here on out list*
*Adds to ignore from here on out list*
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:54 pm to LarrySellers
quote:
USC has 1.5 National Titles in that time period (unless you want to not count the '04 title with Reggie Bush). Which is the exact same as LSU. Its funny how LSU fans like to pretend they didn't split the '03 NC with USC. USC also played in the '05 NC where they lost a thriller to TX
lol at this entire paragraph.
Obvious troll is obvious.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:54 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
quote:
quote:
was Aunbuns 2004 win over LSU controversial in any way
No, Auburns win over LSUwho was not.
I was there... looked pretty legit to me.
quote:
Aunbuns
How old is Crow Pie? 12?
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:54 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
Good thing the flame war has ended.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:55 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
HA! LSU only played cause of Pitt that year.
none the less...we played
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:55 pm to Festus
quote:
When you say "you", do you mean the NCAA?
no i mean you personally
I personally still saw USC demolish every team they played on the field in 2004, and dont know of any on field advantage USC had because Reggie was taking money from agents. There was no better team in 2004 than USC and it wasn't even close
If you want to pretend that wasn't the case, then that is your choice the NCAA provided you with that option. But I think the NCAA is personally a joke and just b/c they say those games never happened, I still remember watching them and I'm fairly certain they did happen
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:56 pm to JPLSU1981
1a. LSU (Just because of the 3 SEC titles to UF's 2)
1b. UF
3. USC
1b. UF
3. USC
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:56 pm to LarrySellers
quote:Yeah those were pretty much ranked in order. Although I'd probably bump Auburn just ahead of USC and then I'd like the order.
not Bama, we dont belong on that list. If it were the last 5 years then yes, but not since 2000 we had some HORRIBLE years
Page 12 of 24
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News