Started By
Message
re: Which SEC school brings the least to the conference?
Posted on 12/27/13 at 2:59 pm to UMTigerRebel
Posted on 12/27/13 at 2:59 pm to UMTigerRebel
quote:
Damn it FaWx. Leave it to you to derail an already awful thread and make it worse.
I do my best.
Posted on 12/27/13 at 3:02 pm to Pettifogger
quote:quote:
LSU is easily one of the premier programs in the SEC. Top 3 for sure. And I fricking hate LSU.
Depends on what you mean.
Uh, what? Try 45 National Championships. The most in the conference and 5th among Division 1 schools
Posted on 12/27/13 at 3:03 pm to GCTiger11
quote:
Uh, what? Try 45 National Championships. The most in the conference and 5th among Division 1 schools
What? The majority of which are in things nobody gives a shite about.
Anyway, the discussion was about whether or not LSU was prestigious.
Posted on 12/27/13 at 3:04 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
But because of admission requirements, and who actually went to the school, they can assume that the average Aggie is smarter than the average Black Bear.
Yeah, but if assumptions were all that mattered, then things like networking and job interviews would be meaningless. They aren't. Ultimately it comes down to you, what you've accomplished, and what your skills are.
quote:
I did pretty well in the stock market this year
Holy shite so did I. I was kinda surprised by it.
Posted on 12/27/13 at 3:07 pm to DCRebel
Definitely Alabama. No one believes they run a clean program. Their success is the best money can buy.............just saying.
Posted on 12/27/13 at 3:10 pm to alabamabuckeye
quote:
They have baseball, though
No, they don't.
Posted on 12/27/13 at 3:10 pm to DCRebel
quote:
Yeah, but if assumptions were all that mattered, then things like networking and job interviews would be meaningless. They aren't. Ultimately it comes down to you, what you've accomplished, and what your skills are.
Aptitude does matter though, whatever you want to emphasize on it, I don't know, but the pool of kids A&M gets is more talented than the one Ole Miss gets. I mean you're right, the most successful guy I graduated from high school with was a fire fighter in the airforce, and now is a self-made multi-millionaire from search engine optimization shite. But I'd still feel more comfortable sending my kid to A&M more so than Ole Miss. It doesn't mean I don't think my kid could be wildly successful if he became a Black Bear, I just think some schools are better.
Posted on 12/27/13 at 3:11 pm to DCRebel
quote:
Holy shite so did I. I was kinda surprised by it.
Whole market was up really high. Business cycle yada yada. I am heavily leveraged in to oil and gas, but I think I am gonna invest in some REITs this year. This lazy arse generation needs to move out of mom and dad's at some point.
Posted on 12/27/13 at 3:12 pm to alabamabuckeye
My school is better than your school which is better than his school over there.
Threads like this are so pointless.
Threads like this are so pointless.
Posted on 12/27/13 at 3:16 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
But I'd still feel more comfortable sending my kid to A&M more so than Ole Miss. It doesn't mean I don't think my kid could be wildly successful if he became a Black Bear, I just think some schools are better.
For me it depends on what my (nonexistent) kid wants to study. If he wanted to be an aerospace engineer, then of course I'd nudge him towards A&M (which is laughable because he's getting into Stanford anyway duh). If he wanted to study accounting, English, or pharmacology I'd send him to Ole Miss (again, presuming he isn't at Stanford).
Posted on 12/27/13 at 3:17 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
I am heavily leveraged in to oil and gas
I'm more invested in telecommunications and the aerospace industry, both of which are doing well.
Posted on 12/27/13 at 3:17 pm to OBReb6
We also have a handful of national titles in smaller sports outside the big 3.
If we are basing the criteria off championships in order to boot someone out of the sec, then it has to be miss state.
They have 0. If anyone remembers the CWS the announcers compared ucla to miss state with total championships.
Ucla had like 100+ championships compared to state's 0
If we are basing the criteria off championships in order to boot someone out of the sec, then it has to be miss state.
They have 0. If anyone remembers the CWS the announcers compared ucla to miss state with total championships.
Ucla had like 100+ championships compared to state's 0
Posted on 12/27/13 at 3:18 pm to DCRebel
quote:
For me it depends on what my (nonexistent) kid wants to study.
My non-existent kid is gonna study space medicine at MIT. He's a badass.
Posted on 12/27/13 at 3:18 pm to DCRebel
quote:
For me it depends on what my (nonexistent) kid wants to study. If he wanted to be an aerospace engineer, then of course I'd nudge him towards A&M (which is laughable because he's getting into Stanford anyway duh). If he wanted to study accounting, English, or pharmacology I'd send him to Ole Miss (again, presuming he isn't at Stanford).
Your example is sort of unfair though. You're making the assumption he could get in to both A&M and Ole Miss.
Posted on 12/27/13 at 3:21 pm to DCRebel
quote:
I'm more invested in telecommunications and the aerospace industry, both of which are doing well.
I need to diversify, I don't know if I have enough cash for that. Maybe an index fund or two. I need to put in my annual contribution to my Roth IRA, and it's all oil and gas at the moment, which I might just want to double down, but I need to look at other long term growth options as well.
Posted on 12/27/13 at 3:35 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Your example is sort of unfair though. You're making the assumption he could get in to both A&M and Ole Miss.
His father could, so he would. IT'S SCIENCE.
Posted on 12/27/13 at 3:39 pm to Gradual_Stroke
quote:
frick this thread.
Do you even stock market, bro?
Posted on 12/27/13 at 3:43 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
much more business
This makes UGA more important to the SEC?
Posted on 12/27/13 at 3:59 pm to LSU Patrick
quote:
This makes UGA more important to the SEC?
The question was prestigious. Overall UGA and LSU are probably pretty similar as far as what they bring to the conference. UGA's reach is much farther than LSU's, the fan base is bigger, the history is more widely known, etc.
I like LSU fine, but c'mon, it's mostly a regional product, while UGA extends a bit farther.
Popular
Back to top



1








