Started By
Message
re: Which program underachives more LSU or Georiga
Posted on 10/21/19 at 11:20 pm to Rip N Lip
Posted on 10/21/19 at 11:20 pm to Rip N Lip
quote:
Look dipshit, let me break this down for you. You just linked an artivle from 2014, which made zero mention of this :
I said here's ANOTHER article.
I know it's a 3 syllable word and stuff but I ASSUMED you knew the meaning. My bad!
quote:
So, is it 21 out of the 85 that are "special admissions", 21 out of 25 per year, or what?
The latest or OTHER article I linked gave Paul Johnson "full autonomy" on special admits.Do you know what that means?The article was from 2014 so that means the players recruited played as recently as last year.
quote:
Try to find something dated 2019
LMFAO when you've absolutely linked nothing to back up to your bullshite.
Once again,ANY type of link and IDGAS if it's from 5 years ago.
You're the one who made the blanket 85% statement.Either back it up or admit you pulled it outta yer arse.
1
Posted on 10/21/19 at 11:40 pm to RD Dawg
Do you realize you are using the "quote" markup, and not the "link" markup?
This is a link within the one article that you have successfully somehow figured out how to link:
https://www.ajc.com/blog/georgia-tech/2014/03/12/johnson-hopeful-about-admissions-changes/
Probbaly mirrors your life, but I'll continue.......
So, this is the only article you have linked, from 2014, that is from a Ga Tech site, that is questioning the possibility of admissions changes based on an Atlanta Urinal Constipation article that now throws a 404 error.
https://www.fromtherumbleseat.com/2014/3/12/5500068/georgia-tech-to-allow-more-academic-exceptions-for-football
So, please, can you provide the admitted dated article where you proffered this:
And you do realize that if GA TECH can take 21 of 85 scholarships (we are taking this at face value off your 5 year or who knows how old data) as special admissions, that it means they can take 25% of their 85 scholarship limit, which is 75%. Add on the walk-ons, which get no special admissions priviledges, and it's right at 85% of UGA.
But keep building up that pussy arse ACC school as some type of big rival, it's the bitch mutt way.
Woof,woof!!!
This is a link within the one article that you have successfully somehow figured out how to link:
https://www.ajc.com/blog/georgia-tech/2014/03/12/johnson-hopeful-about-admissions-changes/
Probbaly mirrors your life, but I'll continue.......
So, this is the only article you have linked, from 2014, that is from a Ga Tech site, that is questioning the possibility of admissions changes based on an Atlanta Urinal Constipation article that now throws a 404 error.
https://www.fromtherumbleseat.com/2014/3/12/5500068/georgia-tech-to-allow-more-academic-exceptions-for-football
So, please, can you provide the admitted dated article where you proffered this:
quote:
The academic profile of a group of 21 Georgia Tech special-admit football players from recent years looked much different. They had a combined average high school GPA of 2.19, according to an "athletes historical report" provided in March in response to an open-records request.
And you do realize that if GA TECH can take 21 of 85 scholarships (we are taking this at face value off your 5 year or who knows how old data) as special admissions, that it means they can take 25% of their 85 scholarship limit, which is 75%. Add on the walk-ons, which get no special admissions priviledges, and it's right at 85% of UGA.
But keep building up that pussy arse ACC school as some type of big rival, it's the bitch mutt way.
Woof,woof!!!
This post was edited on 10/21/19 at 11:46 pm
Posted on 10/22/19 at 12:31 am to Rip N Lip
quote:
Do you realize you are using the "quote" markup, and not the "link" markup?
LMAO!
quote:
And you do realize that if GA TECH can take 21 of 85 scholarships (we are taking this at face value off your 5 year or who knows how old data) as special admissions, that it means they can take 25% of their 85 scholarship limit, which is 75%. Add on the walk-ons, which get no special admissions priviledges, and it's right at 85% of UGA.
Do you have ANY type of comprehension skills!
FROM THE UPDATED ARTICLE WHICH YOU POSTED..
quote:
Now, though, reportedly because CPJ's players have been graduating at historically high rates, he has requested and been granted the repeal of that 20% cap on these exception cases
quote:
Add on the walk-ons, which get no special admissions priviledges, and it's right at 85% of UGA.
Is this Alabama math.So EVERY player at UGA was a special admit?
Once again,back up your bullshite numbers or STFU.
That link from 2014 means those players were recruited and played against UGA players in 2018.
Since you're being so specific about 2019 SHOW ME THE ARTICLE/LINK where you got the 85%?
As I said before GT is casting a WIDE recruiting net with their new staff and they ain't doing with stricter standards.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 1:12 am to Auburntiger
quote:
Final Four and College World Series last season? ( two events that LSU failed to qualify for)
Since you brought that up, when was the last time y’all played in the CWS final? Oh wait...
Posted on 10/22/19 at 1:21 am to BadBrad29
When was the last time UGA won a natty? 1980 and that was their first and only one. Give me a break, it's not even a close competition.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 5:11 am to BadBrad29
LSU’s program ranks above Auburn on every matrix you want to use. SEC titles, wins, National Titles, head to head. Dumb post
Posted on 10/22/19 at 5:16 am to BadBrad29
Georgia
Posted on 10/22/19 at 5:18 am to BadBrad29
This will be an “aged well” thread before season’s end.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 5:20 am to BadBrad29
What's interesting is that Bama has helped both teams underachieve.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 5:42 am to BadBrad29
quote:
Which program underachives more LSU or Georiga
quote:
LSU or Georiga
quote:
Georiga
Posted on 10/22/19 at 6:25 am to BadBrad29
Alabama, Georgia, Clemson, Ohio State get the best players. How does LSU underachieve?. Georiga?
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:13 am to BadBrad29
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:20 am to BadBrad29
The University of Georgia Bulldogs - due to their former coaches!
This post was edited on 10/22/19 at 7:25 am
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:24 am to BadBrad29
All i know is Auburn will have 4 losses this year.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:26 am to BadBrad29
Wasn’t auburn favored to beat Florida earlier this year? How’d that go
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:29 am to La Place Mike
I agree with you that Auburn will have 4 losses -
(1) Florida Gators (L)
(2) Louisiana State Tigers (L)
(3) Georgia Bulldogs
(4) Alabama Crimson Tide
Hopefully, bye-bye Gus Malzahn! Auburn needs a new identity.
(1) Florida Gators (L)
(2) Louisiana State Tigers (L)
(3) Georgia Bulldogs
(4) Alabama Crimson Tide
Hopefully, bye-bye Gus Malzahn! Auburn needs a new identity.
This post was edited on 11/9/19 at 9:20 am
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:32 am to BadBrad29
quote:? Lsu is a top 3 program over the last 2 decades. But that's "underachieving"
Which program underachives more LSU
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:34 am to Big dub
Auburn Tigers -2½ versus the Florida Gators this year. Not a good game from either team but UF won on the scoreboard!
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:36 am to HillbillyQB
Sounds like underachieving to me
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News