Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/27/15 at 1:48 pm to Korin
quote:
And you're wrong.
No, no he isn't. There were bowl games that had National Title implications.
This post was edited on 7/27/15 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 7/27/15 at 1:49 pm to MrAUTigers
Do you even Bowl Coalition and Bowl Alliance, bro?
Posted on 7/27/15 at 1:50 pm to Korin
he'll be an improvement to whatever joke they've been throwing out there since 10'
Posted on 7/27/15 at 1:50 pm to GumpDyke
Who cares if his defenses aren't elite. Our offense is elite and we just need average defense to win it all.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 1:59 pm to Korin
quote:
Do you even Bowl Coalition and Bowl Alliance, bro?
Before the BCS the major bowl's had conference tie-ins. Many years the top two teams were playing in different bowls. This is why the BCS was formed.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 2:00 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
Top 10 D's 10 of the last 12 years. Throw a dart.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 2:04 pm to GumpDyke
Three threads on the front page about Auburn by Alabama fans.... Obligatory:
Posted on 7/27/15 at 2:10 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
Before the BCS the major bowl's had conference tie-ins. Many years the top two teams were playing in different bowls. This is why the BCS was formed.
What's your point exactly? There were several times before even the BC that at least the AP title was on the line for both teams. That's a title game.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 2:15 pm to Korin
So in 50 years of the AP poll, "several times" there was a #1 vs #2 bowl game for the NC? I just don't understand why they ever changed the way they were doing things.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 2:17 pm to Korin
Prior to the BCS era there was never a single bowl game that guaranteed the winner would be the national champion for that year. Therefore, no title game prior to the BCS era.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 2:18 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
"several times" there was a #1 vs #2 bowl game for the NC?
Correct.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 2:18 pm to Spread
quote:
Prior to the BCS era there was never a single bowl game that guaranteed the winner would be the national champion for that year.
Incorrect.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 2:21 pm to Korin
Are you twelve years old?
Posted on 7/27/15 at 2:22 pm to Spread
This post was edited on 7/27/15 at 2:28 pm
Posted on 7/27/15 at 2:26 pm to Korin
Those were self-proclaimed "National Championship" games by the bowls themselves; neither was an official title game, as voters were not bound to vote for the winner and could have voted a different team national champion.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 2:28 pm to Spread
You can lead a horse to water...
Posted on 7/27/15 at 2:30 pm to Korin
Exactly.
Beginning with the BCS era, voters were obligated to vote for the winner of a single game. Prior to the BCS era, there was no voter obligation to vote for the winner of any bowl game.
You are wrong.
Beginning with the BCS era, voters were obligated to vote for the winner of a single game. Prior to the BCS era, there was no voter obligation to vote for the winner of any bowl game.
You are wrong.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 2:31 pm to Spread
Wrong. Again.
Posted on 7/27/15 at 2:33 pm to Spread
quote:So the AP didn't vote USC champions in 2003?
Beginning with the BCS era, voters were obligated to vote for the winner of a single game.
Interdasting...
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News