Started By
Message
re: When Does The Alabama Dynasty End?
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:03 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:03 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
Yeah she has a real butthurt for LSU...not sure if Hog fan or UA fan.
Agreed, by the looks of her constant posts involving LSU, she has to be a piggie
1
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:03 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
No, it is just marginally less impressive than what Florida did. The rest of the country wasn't as weak in those years as it was in 2011.
I see Aggie fans are already toeing the company line of the rest of the SEC when it comes to trying to downplay all things Alabama. Maybe it's all that practice they got with Texas.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:04 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
TeLeFaWx
what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:04 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
I COULDNT HAVE SAID IT BETTER MYSELF. Thank you for making my point. BAMA WAS GIVEN A SHOT. didn't earn shite. Thank you bruh
says #2 nationally
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:05 pm to Grievous Angel
The difference is in 2011 you were able to compare the lack of parity between conferences. You can't make that same claim between the same conference, much less the same division, much less between two teams that weren't given the same chance to prove they were better. The object of the game is to win, the fashion in which it happens is irrelevant. Does it matter that Bama lost by missing 5 field goals, and that they won by arse pounding LSU and barely allowing them past mid field? No. But to win the National championship, LSU would have had to beat the same team twice. Alabama only had to beat LSU once. Last time I checked you don't name a champion by giving one team double elimination, and not the other.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:05 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
Capstone
This post was edited on 7/7/12 at 10:07 pm
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:05 pm to CBandits82
I am no way affiliated with anything from Arkansas.. I just hate LSU.. That is all. 
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:06 pm to MsGarrison
The correct answer is never.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:06 pm to MsGarrison
quote:
Image Link
Fair enough Maybe one day there won't be a need for coattails. Till then
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:06 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Not true. Every year before 2012 teams were chosen by their resume. I'm 2012 they used the eyeball test. You do realize when Espn was saying Bama should play for the title, THEY NEVER ONCE MENTION RESUMES of OSU and Bama? Not once. A save the Iowa state shite. Never , in the history of the BCS , has whom you lost to, outweighed who you beat. Not once.
Dude...you're gonna give yourself a heart attack. Being short, fat, and a soccer player doesn't help, either.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:08 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
The difference is in 2011 you were able to compare the lack of parity between conferences. You can't make that same claim between the same conference, much less the same division, much less between two teams that weren't given the same chance to prove they were better. The object of the game is to win, the fashion in which it happens is irrelevant. Does it matter that Bama lost by missing 5 field goals, and that they won by arse pounding LSU and barely allowing them past mid field? No. But to win the National championship, LSU would have had to beat the same team twice. Alabama only had to beat LSU once. Last time I checked you don't name a champion by giving one team double elimination, and not the other.
Go whine at the BCS offices. The rules are what they are, and we won it according to the system in place that ALL of our schools agreed to.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:08 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Not true. Every year before 2012 teams were chosen by their resume. I'm 2012 they used the eyeball test. You do realize when Espn was saying Bama should play for the title, THEY NEVER ONCE MENTION RESUMES of OSU and Bama? Not once. A save the Iowa state shite. Never , in the history of the BCS , has whom you lost to, outweighed who you beat. Not once.
So you're saying OSU had the better resume. Methinks you would have rather played OSU, because you know they would have been easier to beat.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:09 pm to MsGarrison
quote:
MsGarrison
I like herPosted on 7/7/12 at 10:09 pm to tider04
TeLe must think that REC money bought that shite last year.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:09 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Not true. Every year before 2012 teams were chosen by their resume. I'm 2012 they used the eyeball test. You do realize when Espn was saying Bama should play for the title, THEY NEVER ONCE MENTION RESUMES of OSU and Bama? Not once. A save the Iowa state shite. Never , in the history of the BCS , has whom you lost to, outweighed who you beat. Not once.
It did when OU/tu/Texas Tech tied for the Big 12 South. Texas Tech was viewed as the weaker team, and tu the missed out, even though they beat the team that won the division with the same record. So... You're wrong.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:09 pm to MsGarrison
quote:
I am no way affiliated with anything from Arkansas.. I just hate LSU.. That is all.
Isn't that the same....WPS!
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:10 pm to Grievous Angel
quote:
Methinks you would have rather played OSU, because you know they would have been easier to beat.
That was my preference.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:12 pm to tider04
I know you did. I'm just saying the system wasn't fair. Does that mean I think LSU should be handed the crystal football? No. I'm just saying the system didn't deliver equal opportunity and is stupid, and didn't determine a true champion. The BCS title is yours. But imo, a National Champion was never determined.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:13 pm to CBandits82
quote:
I like her
In a crazed hog sort of way, me too.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:14 pm to Grievous Angel
quote:
I'm trying to figure out how what Alabama did in 2011 is somehow less than what LSU did in 2007. We had one less loss. We didn't pay for the spot--we simply came up #2 in the BCS formula, who didn't apparently consider your ambiguous and conflicted "rules."
There is one huge GLARING diff between LSU 07 and Bama 2011. Of you can't see it , then wow. Also. Many LSU ,including me, think we backed into the game. But you can't call yourself a dynasty when you back into a championship game,and win it. Also, Bama didn't even control their own destiny after NOV 5th., so you can't call yourself a dynasty if you can't even control your own destiny.
LOOK, again for all you Bama posters, BAMA was prob the best team , but just because you're the best team doesn't mean you deserve to be in the title game. you still have to win your way in and Bama had one hard game , at home, as couldn't get it done.
Page 14 of 30
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News