Started By
Message
re: When did the Big 3 from the West change?
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:17 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:17 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Head to head: LSU 18-13-1 vs Auburn.
SEC titles: LSU 7, Auburn 5
Total wins: LSU 610, Auburn 601
Win %: LSU 62.5, Auburn 61.9
SEC win%: LSU 53.5, Auburn 50.9
Bowl games: LSU 31, Auburn 26
Bowl wins: LSU 15, Auburn 14
Wow those are major differences right there.

Now....I wonder what those stats would look like if there was no UAT?
Oh and you left off undefeated seasons for some reason. You know the thing that actually judges how good of a season you had.
This post was edited on 8/24/12 at 12:19 pm
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:17 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
What were you before Saban?
This cracks me up when I see this on here. People think LSU was nothing before the 2000's which is absolutely rediculous

Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:18 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Arky has not taken Auburn's spot. Period. This writer doesn't know what he's talking about. A BCS title, 2 years ago, trumps anything Arky has done,ever, in the sec. The writer is an Idiot.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:21 pm to MattP598
quote:
Let's see one of those you won with 1 loss, hell one of them you backdoored your way in with 2 losses. Last year I wouldn't even consider yourself in that championship game. Did y'all ever show up?
Yeah a SEC title, the only title you don't win by being voted into, is nothing.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:21 pm to MattP598
quote:
with your one or two loss season.
Yet we still got in. You go undefeated in '04 and can't get in. LSU is considered with more respect by the national public than Auburn. A fact is a fact.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:23 pm to CBandits82
The sec rant, which was the best sec board around, has gone to total shite. There is never a rational convo anymore.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:23 pm to MattP598
quote:
Wow those are major differences right there.

quote:
Now....I wonder what those stats would look like if they were correct
FIFY
Where did he get those? first one right off the bat, I noticed
quote:
18-13-1
Although they still held the lead then, I believe it was 15-18-1, and checked total wins and was wrong as well
This post was edited on 8/24/12 at 12:24 pm
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:25 pm to CBandits82
quote:
You go undefeated in '04 and can't get in. LSU is considered with more respect by the national public than Auburn. A fact is a fact.
Do you have down syndrome?
You are actually comparing a season where three BCS teams went undefeated with a season where a perfect storm of upsets got a two loss team in...really?
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:25 pm to CBandits82
quote:
Yet we still got in. You go undefeated in '04 and can't get in. LSU is considered with more respect by the national public than Auburn. A fact is a fact.
Or it COULD of just been the fact that there were 3 undefeated BCS schools with a shitty system that only allows 2 to play. How many other undefeated, oops excuse me LSU wasn't undefeated so other isn't the right word, how many undefeated BCS teams were there in the two years LSU "won" the BCS championship. I mean I know you split one with USC. But of course they weren't undefeated either.
This post was edited on 8/24/12 at 12:26 pm
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:26 pm to MattP598
quote:
Wow those are major differences right there.
It's funny how close the numbers are, but also funny how Auburn isn't better at any one of those stats. With the two teams being so close, you'd think Auburn would be better than LSU at least at something.
But no, they're not. Nothing.
And remember those numbers were all BEFORE Saban got to LSU.
People think LSU was nothing before Saban, but they were basically the third best team in the league behind Alabama and Tennessee.
quote:
I wonder what those stats would look like of there was no UAT?
Way better for LSU.
Auburn and LSU have played Alabama about the same number of games with Auburn's win% vs the Tide much better than LSU's. If you took records vs Bama out of the mix, LSU's win% would jump higher than AU's.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:28 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
There is never a rational convo past the third page of a thread.
fify
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:28 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
I wonder what those stats would look like of there was no UAT?
Way better for LSU.
Auburn and LSU have played Alabama about the same number of games with Auburn's win% vs the Tide much better than LSU's. If you took records vs Bama out of the mix, LSU's win% would jump higher than AU's.
LOL really? You don't think we would have been a better program if we were the state school? You do realize that we are in a state where about 70% of the population supports the state school of UAT. We split recruits with them, money, fans, support and we are STILL on par with your school. Meanwhile you battle the likes of Tulane, La. Monroe, La. Tech, and don't even have a freaking rival.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:30 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
It's funny how close the numbers are, but also funny how Auburn isn't better at any one of those stats. With the two teams being so close, you'd think Auburn would be better than LSU at least at something.
Its also funny how LSU fans recognize these closeness and yet continue to place themselves on some plateau high above Auburn over what...a dozen wins, one more title, a few more SECC.
And when their hypocrisy is given, they bust out the fish pics.
Cringe at the thought of considering Auburn an equal...both loathing the Turds in the middle.
It used to be so easy to cheer for you guys.
This post was edited on 8/24/12 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:32 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Where did he get those?
STASSEN. And LSU Wiki and Auburn Wiki for bowl games.
quote:
Although they still held the lead then
Exactly.
Just remember: LSU was better than Auburn before Nick Saban got to LSU.

Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:32 pm to TheSandman
quote:
"LSU/Bama/Arky"
quote:
Arkansas finishes above us in the division standings
quote:
Arkansas has been up there with LSU/Bama since they've joined the SEC.
quote:
but Arkansas? Seriously?
quote::hogsessed:
you'd think Arkansas would've at least won an SEC championship by now.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:33 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
It used to be so easy to cheer for you guys
It has never been. Most LSU fans I know are terrible to deal with. Few are actually fun to watch games with.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:33 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
STASSEN.
Conversatino aside...id be wary of that site.
I ahve found some irregularities in the past with their numbers.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:35 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
It used to be so easy to cheer for you guys.
Why the hell would I want or care if an Auburn fan cheers for LSU?

Posted on 8/24/12 at 12:36 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
STASSEN. And LSU Wiki and Auburn Wiki for bowl games.
You were wrong, what year did you use as a cut off. you were right on some
quote:
Head to head: LSU 18-15-1 vs Auburn.
SEC titles: LSU 7, Auburn 5
Total wins: LSU 588, Auburn 584
Win %: LSU 62.3, Auburn 61.7
SEC win%: LSU 53.6, Auburn 51.2 Bowl games: LSU 31, Auburn 26
Bowl wins: LSU 15, Auburn 14
Never said LSU was worse by the way, it was in response to a dumbass who suggested there was no comparison between the two. also said auburn had always been a bad program. was meant to point out the similarities
Popular
Back to top
