Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:48 pm to ohiovol
quote:
Ridiculous.You can't just look at the record of a few teams and determine that.
A few teams? 5 out of the 6 teams are ranked. There are 4 legitimate top 10 teams in the division. It's almost inarguable that this is the deepest and most difficult division since conferences started splitting 18 years ago.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:49 pm to ohiovol
quote:
Not so sure about Georgia
Defensively they are statistically better.
quote:
you left Florida off the list altogether
We didn't play Florida this year or last year.
quote:
and not a chance in hell this UT team is better than last years squad.
You're right I had that backwards.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:51 pm to AUTigLN11
Bama facing the then #1 Florida team in the SECCG probably gives 2009 Bama the edge in strength of schedule.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 11:04 pm to FTBLFN
quote:
Bama facing the then #1 Florida team in the SECCG probably gives 2009 Bama the edge in strength of schedule.
Who did you guys beat in the regular season that was any good? Honest question? VT was good but AU, UT, LSU, Ark, MSU, USC were all average last year. We played 6 games against teams that were/are ranked. Three of them are legit top 10 teams and if So Car didn't have to play us twice they would be up there close as well. Plus a dangerous UGA team and Clemson before Kyle Parker realized he had millions of dollars at stake and mailed it in. Florida was obviously the best out of all the teams and you guys destroyed them but I think the overall depth of our schedule was more difficult.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 11:08 pm to AUTigLN11
First of all...i didn't play for Bama last year and I doubt YOU have ever played football for any college.
Bama's 2009 season was more impressive than auburn's 2010 season...plus Bama's season didn't have the stench of a paid player and possible sanctions hanging over it.
Deal with it.
Bama's 2009 season was more impressive than auburn's 2010 season...plus Bama's season didn't have the stench of a paid player and possible sanctions hanging over it.
Deal with it.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 11:15 pm to FTBLFN
Cam wins, no question. This Heisman vote would be the most lopsided in history if there weren't so many dark clouds hanging over AU this year. Ingram barely won, and he only did imo because the NE/W/SW vote was split so hard between McCoy, Suh, and Gerhart with a few Ingram thrown in there. Take any of those three out and one of the remaining two wins. I'm not diminishing Ingram, he had a very good season, but it was a borderline 1st & 2nd team all-american season, not a Heisman season.
Like others have said, he wasn't even the best player on his team. He was better than Tate, though, and I think that AU fans should admit that much, at least. You don't see Bammers saying McElroy is better than Cam this year
Like others have said, he wasn't even the best player on his team. He was better than Tate, though, and I think that AU fans should admit that much, at least. You don't see Bammers saying McElroy is better than Cam this year
Posted on 12/6/10 at 11:47 pm to RollTigers
Anyone who thinks Tate is/was better than Mark Ingram should never be taken seriously in anything they do in their life, ever. They shouldn't be able to vote, even in Alabama. I wouldn't let someone that stupid handle the remote control to my television.
Posted on 12/7/10 at 6:24 am to FTBLFN
quote:
First of all...i didn't play for Bama last year and I doubt YOU have ever played football for any college.
quote:
Bama's 2009 season was more impressive than auburn's 2010 season
If that makes you feel better.
quote:
Deal with it.
13-0, 28-27, greatest player in CFB history, most dominating SECCG win ever, headed to Glendale, All In, Family.
Deal with it redneck.
Posted on 12/7/10 at 8:20 am to AUTigLN11
Ingram's great but he was a fill-in heisman winner. "The best player on the best team award". CN's hype this year is wayyyy bigger than Ingram's hype ever was. Only once in a while is the heisman winner the player most people really think is the best player in the country. This year, that'll be the case.
Posted on 12/7/10 at 10:01 am to rbWarEagle
Cam in a landslide
That is a shame. Until Mark Ingram, Bo Jackson's year was the closest vote ever, and to think that more people would think that someone like Cam Newton deserves this award than they did Bo Jackson is just stupid. One day people are really going to find out what this kid is like, and believe me it will come out. Someone like this just does not change when things are always handed to him, and when he gets in trouble it is covered up. No matter how much talent he has, when you play with the big boys, it will not be covered up for you, because you will just be one little fish in a very big pond, and they will not really care about you.
That is a shame. Until Mark Ingram, Bo Jackson's year was the closest vote ever, and to think that more people would think that someone like Cam Newton deserves this award than they did Bo Jackson is just stupid. One day people are really going to find out what this kid is like, and believe me it will come out. Someone like this just does not change when things are always handed to him, and when he gets in trouble it is covered up. No matter how much talent he has, when you play with the big boys, it will not be covered up for you, because you will just be one little fish in a very big pond, and they will not really care about you.
Posted on 12/7/10 at 10:14 am to FTBLFN
who's dad is the biggest loser ?
Posted on 12/7/10 at 10:16 am to I-59 Tiger
THAT would be a close one.
Posted on 12/7/10 at 11:14 am to FTBLFN
Cam wins the Heisman
but 10 AU > 09 Bama???
AU hasnt won the title yet
but 10 AU > 09 Bama???
AU hasnt won the title yet
Posted on 12/7/10 at 11:22 am to UASports23
quote:
Last year's SEC Defenses > This year's SEC defenses
So that means Mark sucks against worse defenses...
Posted on 12/7/10 at 11:28 am to RollTigers
quote:
Like others have said, he wasn't even the best player on his team. He was better than Tate, though, and I think that AU fans should admit that much, at least. You don't see Bammers saying McElroy is better than Cam this year
I think Tates numbers could have been equal to Ingrams if he was playing behind Bama's Oline last year...but numbers were better than Tates...
Posted on 12/7/10 at 11:35 am to rbWarEagle
quote:
rbWarEagle
Newsflash: Having an opinion which differs from rb's = being retarded.
That is all.
Posted on 12/7/10 at 12:12 pm to FTBLFN
quote:
FTBLFN
Since you have that picture you need to change your sig to:
“Let it be known if the bammers win tonight ( against Texas) it might just kill me. The amount of cheating by the SEC this year on their behalf is sickening”….. Mark Green 1/7/2010
Posted on 12/7/10 at 12:13 pm to plutonium55
great idea
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News