Started By
Message
re: We should let Auburn run to the East
Posted on 6/18/15 at 10:16 am to MrAUTigers
Posted on 6/18/15 at 10:16 am to MrAUTigers
quote:
Georgia still can't get there
que? We've gone twice the last 4 seasons.
1
Posted on 6/18/15 at 10:22 am to WG_Dawg
Missouri has won the eastern division more times than Georgia since they joined the conference. Let that sink in for a minute
Posted on 6/18/15 at 10:23 am to auburnphan23
quote:
Missouri has won the eastern division more times than Georgia since they joined the conference. Let that sink in for a minute
Georgia and AU both have the same amount of division titles in that time frame. We are also 2-1 against missouri head to head (and 2-1 against auburn). WGAS
Posted on 6/18/15 at 10:26 am to MrAUTigers
I guess he blacked out during 2011 and 2012.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 10:28 am to WG_Dawg
You really can't compare the two divisions when every western division champion has gone on to win the SEC championship since 2009
Posted on 6/18/15 at 10:28 am to MrAUTigers
quote:
Auburn isn't in the East and Georgia still can't get there........ with a down UT and UF.
Well....over the last 5 years we have been there as much as Auburn has, and over the past 10 years we have been there MORE than Auburn has. And since over that same 10 year period we have done pretty well against Auburn, i would think that trend would continue, no?
You really should do some research before you hit that submit button!
Posted on 6/18/15 at 10:30 am to auburnphan23
quote:
Missouri has won the eastern division more times than Georgia since they joined the conference. Let that sink in for a minute
They've been there more than Auburn has, too. let THAT sink in for a minute. Oh, and so has georgia. Let THAT sink in for a minute.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 10:35 am to WG_Dawg
I do not want to get into a pissing match between Georgia and Auburn. The truth is, the DSOR is still my favorite game of the year. Moving to the East does not seem bad mainly because we would definitely get to keep that game.
I would miss playing LSU. I do understand it would put Alabama in a tough spot in that they would have to drop either Auburn or Tennessee.
All that being said, it makes no sense to me for Mizzou to be in the East. Of the candidates for the East, it seems Auburn would be the best fit.
I would miss playing LSU. I do understand it would put Alabama in a tough spot in that they would have to drop either Auburn or Tennessee.
All that being said, it makes no sense to me for Mizzou to be in the East. Of the candidates for the East, it seems Auburn would be the best fit.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 10:35 am to auburnphan23
quote:
You really can't compare the two divisions when every western division champion has gone on to win the SEC championship since 2009
You might have a point. Over the last 10 years Auburn is 5-5 against Alabama and 3-7 against UGA.
No comparison.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 10:36 am to auburnphan23
quote:
every western division champion has gone on to win the SEC championship since 2009
make up your mind tard, are you talking about winning the division (which is the direction you started going in a few minutes ago), or winning the SEC?
Not surprising...you get abused in an argument then switch the argument to fit whatever narrative you want to go in next.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 10:36 am to higgs_boson
quote:
I do not want to get into a pissing match between Georgia and Auburn. The truth is, the DSOR is still my favorite game of the year. Moving to the East does not seem bad mainly because we would definitely get to keep that game.
I would miss playing LSU. I do understand it would put Alabama in a tough spot in that they would have to drop either Auburn or Tennessee.
All that being said, it makes no sense to me for Mizzou to be in the East. Of the candidates for the East, it seems Auburn would be the best fit.
All trolling aside, you are right. I agree 100%.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 11:26 am to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Can we trade northalabamacracker for Larry?
Was Larry banned?
If so that's disappointing. His sad trolls were always entertaining.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 12:36 pm to WG_Dawg
Does Missour play in the same division as Auburn? frick no! This makes your attempted comparison idiotic
This post was edited on 6/18/15 at 12:40 pm
Posted on 6/18/15 at 1:30 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
Does Missour play in the same division as Auburn? frick no! This makes your attempted comparison idiotic
You actually make a good point. Just because we spank you every year doesn't mean that would carry over to the rest of the East, does it?
Posted on 6/18/15 at 1:45 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
Only bammer tards would refuse to play someone and then talk about how much they would have won if the game was played.
Auburn was the school who pressed for the Iron Bowl to be resumed. Bammer is the school who fought against resuming the game until they were pressured by the Alabama legislature
Only a sorry hick auNeck would brag about 73 years of "dominance" and not mention that the two teams didn't play for 40 of those years. Not only that, but a 40 year period in which Alabama excelled.
Only a pitiful person needing validation from big brother would suggest that certain coaches records be disallowed when calculating the wins and losses in the series.
auNeck FantastyLand version of their "dominance":
Xen Scott - Did not compete
Wallace Wade - Did not compete
Frank Thomas - Did not compete
Bear Bryant - Don't count his wins
Gene Stallings - Don't count his wins
Nick Saban - Don't count his wins.
The conclusion, in auNeckery logic, is that they are an overall better team. Bammers just been lucky to have good coaches, at times, and that doesn't really count.
Does that about sum it up? I think it does and that type of attitude also sums up why so many different fanbases get a bad vibe from the fambly cult down dere in Opelika.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 1:58 pm to Alert Mi
Only a bammer tard would ignore that the Iron Bowl was cancelled in 1907 and Auburn continued to be the superior team up until the early 1920's which is half or close to half of the time the game was discontinued.
A bammer tard is also the only person who would ignore the fact that even a former student trainer on their own football team during the late 1920's and early 1930's claims bammers rise to power during that time was at least partially fueled by starting their well established tradition of paying players, recruiting dozens or hundreds of players that were functionally illiterate, and basically doing anything else it took to win
A bammer tard is also the only person who would ignore the fact that even a former student trainer on their own football team during the late 1920's and early 1930's claims bammers rise to power during that time was at least partially fueled by starting their well established tradition of paying players, recruiting dozens or hundreds of players that were functionally illiterate, and basically doing anything else it took to win
This post was edited on 6/18/15 at 2:01 pm
Posted on 6/18/15 at 2:01 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
Auburn continued to be the superior team up until the early 1920's
quote:
former student trainer on their own football team during the late 1920's and early 1930's claims
Posted on 6/18/15 at 2:02 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
A bammer tard is also the only person who would ignore the fact that even a former student trainer on their own football team during the late 1920's and early 1930's claims bammers rise to power during that time was at least partially fueled by starting their well established tradition of paying players, recruiting dozens or hundreds of players that were functionally illiterate, and basically doing anything else it took to win
You're one phunny dude.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 2:03 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:Get Phannie's flowchart out again today in case folks missed it yesterday.
WG_Dawg
Posted on 6/18/15 at 2:04 pm to RT1941
It seems to be outdated, he's brought out a few new gems in the last few weeks since this was created
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News