Started By
Message
re: WDE24's Top 5 SEC Running Backs - Watch List
Posted on 5/30/13 at 1:27 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
Posted on 5/30/13 at 1:27 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:That would be ridiculous. There are 4 AU backs.
3 auburn backs and one bama back.
Posted on 5/30/13 at 1:27 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
3 auburn backs and one bama back. Seems legit
You don't know what a watch list is do you? This isn't list the premier running back. Everyone knows Yeldon is going to be the feature running back. He's saying who has a chance to have a break-out season...Thats all.
Posted on 5/30/13 at 1:42 pm to plazadweller
quote:No he's not. The title is "WDE24's Top 5 SEC Running Backs - Watch List".
You don't know what a watch list is do you? This isn't list the premier running back. Everyone knows Yeldon is going to be the feature running back. He's saying who has a chance to have a break-out season...Thats all.
Who's saying that Yeldon and Drake or Henry couldn't both be in the top 5? Is he assuming that only 1 RB from each school will be?
Posted on 5/30/13 at 1:45 pm to WDE24
Thanks for adding Henry Josey! 

Posted on 5/30/13 at 1:46 pm to jatebe
quote:They could, but it is unlikely.
Who's saying that Yeldon and Drake or Henry couldn't both be in the top 5?
quote:Well, once games are played this list is predicated on actual on field performance. It is possible that more than one player from the same school could make the top 5, but it doesn't happen often.
Is he assuming that only 1 RB from each school will be?
I just happen to think that Yeldon is so good that the other guys won't have the opportunity to put up the numbers to make the list. For that reason, I have resisted putting them on the watch list. However, whether or not they make the pre-season watch list, they can still earn their way on the Top 5 list through their performance.
This thread was really just a way for fans of schools to make me aware of some potential RBs in the league that I may be unaware of. Mostly for schools whose top RBs from last year have moved on or for teams like Mizzou and UK whom I am not familiar with their rosters.
Posted on 5/30/13 at 1:48 pm to RebFeBrees
I hope you are correct. Scott does not need to be a feature back and Mathers has the potential to be an absolute stud.
Posted on 5/30/13 at 1:54 pm to roadGator
quote:
Please provide as detailed as possible reasoning for adding or removing someone from this watch list.
Posted on 5/30/13 at 1:57 pm to WDE24
He's totally fricking awesome and his dad was the greatest Jag to ever live. He's got real diamond earrings too. None of that CZ shite the poors wear.
Posted on 5/30/13 at 1:58 pm to WDE24
people have seriously got to stop putting jeff scott on these lists.. Even one made by this guy
Posted on 5/30/13 at 2:01 pm to jatebe
quote:
He's made it perfectly clear that only one Alabama RB gets listed.
And his explanation was perfectly rational.
Calm your jimmies.
Posted on 5/30/13 at 2:02 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
3 auburn backs and one bama back. Seems legit.
Had reading comprehension really become this bad in this country?
Posted on 5/30/13 at 2:03 pm to UMRealist
quote:He is the 5th leading returning SEC RB by yards per game and will be the starter for OM to begin the season (and most likely throughout the season). Seems worthy enough to make a watch list.
people have seriously got to stop putting jeff scott on these lists.. Even one made by this guy
Posted on 5/30/13 at 2:04 pm to WDE24
quote:
(and most likely throughout the season).
No....
If this list were the top 5 running backs to run 20 yards horizontally to gain 1 yard vertically then he'd be numero uno
This post was edited on 5/30/13 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 5/30/13 at 2:11 pm to UMRealist
quote:Which is why he, nor any other OM RB, will likely be on the list once it is released. However, he is deserving of being on the watch list and he will remain.
If this list were the top 5 running backs to run 20 yards horizontally to gain 1 yard vertically then he'd be numero uno
You have failed to convince me to have him removed. However, you do get credit for at least giving a reason for wanting him removed. Others have not been so obliging.
Posted on 5/30/13 at 2:17 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Remove - J. Hill, will be playing defense, protecting his backfield in OPP.
Won't even spend a second in jail. He might miss the first two games TOPS
Posted on 5/30/13 at 2:19 pm to roadGator
You really think Taylor should be on this list? I'm not opposed to it. There will be lots of competition for carries at UF and WM is going to run the ball a ton. I suppose I could see it. Give me a convincing argument.
Popular
Back to top
