Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/1/11 at 5:21 pm to flomacanes
Kimbrow seems like a good pickup.
This post was edited on 7/1/11 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 7/1/11 at 5:25 pm to NIH
quote:
Probably because Dooley isn't a very good recruiter.
What exactly does that make Merlins?
Posted on 7/1/11 at 5:26 pm to volfan30
not a very good recruiter? i've never said he was. he has a few on staff, however. besides, State doesn't have near the facilities, tradition, or cash to throw at recruits.
This post was edited on 7/1/11 at 5:27 pm
Posted on 7/1/11 at 5:28 pm to slayerxing
quote:
Why is Vandy's recruiting so much better than Tennessee right now?
Question gets asked every year about Tennessee. All of our commits come during the season and towards NSD because all of our high profile kids are out of state kids. Same question was asked during the summer when Fulmer was here, Kiffin, and now Dooley. It will continue to happen, we don't get early commitments at all.
Posted on 7/1/11 at 5:29 pm to volfan30
Is Vandy's class as a whole really that special?
This post was edited on 7/1/11 at 5:29 pm
Posted on 7/1/11 at 5:30 pm to ohiovol
quote:
Is Vandy's class as a whole really that special?
They have one kid with a Tennessee offer but they are pwning us in state.
Posted on 7/1/11 at 5:32 pm to volfan30
quote:
They have one kid with a Tennessee offer but they are pwning us in state.
Is that a big deal? Serious question. I'm not sure the staff is overly concerned with the 'build a fence around Tenenssee' stuff.
This post was edited on 7/1/11 at 5:33 pm
Posted on 7/1/11 at 5:38 pm to ohiovol
quote:
Is Vandy's class as a whole really that special?
For Vandy, yeah.
Go back and look at some of their past recruiting classes...lots and lots of two star players, maybe a few three stars and some kids that weren't even ranked. I used to live in Nashville and it was pretty sad some of the kids that Vandy would recruit.
The fact that they have like 10 3-star players already is a pretty big deal for them.
They were doing better in Johnson's last years too.
I'm wondering if Vandy has relaxed it's rigid admissions policies a little bit. I know for a fact that in the past some good players wanted to go to Vandy but the admissions department told the coaching staff, no dice.
Posted on 7/1/11 at 5:39 pm to ohiovol
Posted on 7/1/11 at 5:42 pm to Damn Good Dawg
I'll take 29 out of 30 and 46 out of 50. I do hate that worthless 2005 team though.
Posted on 7/1/11 at 5:45 pm to volfan30
Times are changing! It's the time of the dores now
Posted on 7/1/11 at 5:45 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Didn't they beat you after that?
Posted on 7/1/11 at 5:47 pm to AUFANATL
quote:
The fact that they have like 10 3-star players already is a pretty big deal for them.
Last year they had 15 3 star commits. The year before they had 17 3 stars and a 4 star. The only difference seems to be they're getting the commits in bulk.
This post was edited on 7/1/11 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 7/1/11 at 5:51 pm to ohiovol
Yea, got us in 2006 on homecoming
No one realizes that in 2007 we really almost lost to them again, probably should have, but we forced a late fumble and kicked a FG.
No one realizes that in 2007 we really almost lost to them again, probably should have, but we forced a late fumble and kicked a FG.
Posted on 7/2/11 at 1:08 am to NIH
quote:
besides, State doesn't have near the facilities, tradition, or cash to throw at recruits.
That is what Cecil said.
Posted on 7/2/11 at 4:34 am to DaleDenton
quote:
Big Commie Weekend!
The only recruit in TN that I give a damn about and want on UT's team is Drae Bowles.
This post was edited on 7/2/11 at 4:37 am
Posted on 7/2/11 at 5:21 am to flomacanes
did we just lose a recruiting battle to vandy?
Tennessee football- laughingstock since 2008
Tennessee football- laughingstock since 2008
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News