Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/5/23 at 2:35 pm to XWing atAliciousness
quote:
Meanwhile, Texas Tech once reinstated football player Nigel Bethel after he had beat the shite out of a girl that was caught on camera, the footage of which was released to the public.
What a fcking clown…. “Meanwhile” means: at the same time.
The story you referenced is from 2014. So, this clearly didn’t happen around the same time Beard was striking his woman.
Posted on 1/5/23 at 2:43 pm to XWing atAliciousness
Typical Longhorn fan caring more about the optics of the situation than the victim. Does firing Beard benefit the victim or Texas?
Posted on 1/5/23 at 2:44 pm to MackDaddyBrown
quote:
Typical Longhorn fan caring more about the optics of the situation than the victim. Does firing Beard benefit the victim or Texas?
quote:
MackDaddyBrown
quote:...I think you forgot to log out of your alter on this one, buddy.
Texas fan
Posted on 1/5/23 at 2:44 pm to XWing atAliciousness
Can't answer the question?
Posted on 1/5/23 at 2:45 pm to Reservoir Ag
quote:Exactly. At this same time Texas Tech is ridiculing Texas for not acting fast enough on Chris Beard (who, ironically, Tech had offered a lifetime contract to), they're simultaneously conveniently looking past their own horrible past
“Meanwhile” means: at the same time.
Stones and glass houses and all that
Posted on 1/5/23 at 2:46 pm to EKG
Took them long enough
Posted on 1/5/23 at 2:46 pm to texag7
No doubt he ends up somewhere in the SEC once it all blows over
Posted on 1/5/23 at 2:49 pm to MackDaddyBrown
quote:Sure:
Can't answer the question?
Texas had cause to fire Chris Beard. All that is required for such termination is a felony charge (not conviction). In no world is it OK for a man to put his hands on a woman, especially to the extent that was originally claimed and reported to the police after the victim called 911. Even if Chris Beard is exonerated, this is a mess that Texas should not have to deal with (actions "unbecoming to the university" is also grounds for firing with cause).
It's not Texas' duty to help the victim, as that's what the justice system is for. Once everything has been laid out and everyone has their due process, I have absolutely no problem with Texas reaching out and trying to help the victim.
But the victim doesn't really have much to do with whether Texas was going to continue to employ Chris Beard or not. There's no place for that kind of behavior anywhere.
Again - you're making it a little too obvious you're an alter (if your shitty threads didn't already to that)
Posted on 1/5/23 at 2:51 pm to MackDaddyBrown
quote:
Typical Longhorn fan caring more about the optics of the situation than the victim. Does firing Beard benefit the victim or Texas?
The State of Texas will pursue the interests of justice in regards to the victim.
The University of Texas looks out of the interest of the University of Texas....as does every university.
Why is this hard for you? Well, you posted this under the wrong account genius.
Posted on 1/5/23 at 2:51 pm to XWing atAliciousness
You wrote out all that just to say what i already said. Texas cares about optics and not the victim.
And i can guarantee you I'm a Texas grad if you want to do a ban bet
And i can guarantee you I'm a Texas grad if you want to do a ban bet
Posted on 1/5/23 at 2:52 pm to EKG
How long until A&M goes after him?
Posted on 1/5/23 at 2:52 pm to MackDaddyBrown
quote:Huh?
You wrote out all that just to say what i already said. Texas cares about optics and not the victim.
What exactly should Texas do, in your mind, that states they are more worried about the victim than optics? You're not making any sense.
quote:Not interested tbh, and if you are, then you should be embarrassed. Your takes are beyond trash on this site (sports or otherwise)
And i can guarantee you I'm a Texas grad if you want to do a ban bet
Posted on 1/5/23 at 2:52 pm to SneezyBeltranIsHere
What am i not understanding? I pretty directly said that Texas only cares about itself 
Posted on 1/5/23 at 2:53 pm to MackDaddyBrown
quote:
Can't answer the question?
quote:
What exactly should Texas do, in your mind, that states they are more worried about the victim than optics?
Posted on 1/5/23 at 2:54 pm to XWing atAliciousness
quote:
What exactly should Texas do, in your mind, that states they are more worried about the victim than optics?
Not fire Beard. I don't want him gone.
quote:
Not interested tbh, and if you are,
So you don't even believe the crap you spew about people either
Posted on 1/5/23 at 2:55 pm to MackDaddyBrown
quote:Yea. Because that helps the victim...
Not fire Beard. I don't want him gone.
quote:Nah. It's just obvious to see through your schtick
So you don't even believe the crap you spew about people either
Posted on 1/5/23 at 2:56 pm to XWing atAliciousness
quote:
Yea. Because that helps the victim...
Inarguably helps her pocketbook, and it's what she wanted--hence her recantation.
quote:
Nah. It's just obvious to see through your schtick
So obvious then do the ban bet
Posted on 1/5/23 at 2:59 pm to MackDaddyBrown
quote:
Inarguably helps her pocketbook, and it's what she wanted--hence her recantation.
So you know the victim? You know her and Chris' relationship? That's literally the only reason she would recant?
quote:"Texas doesn't care about the victim!!!!
MackDaddyBrown
"quote:"The only reason the victim recanted is because she's a liar and just wants his money. Don't blame me, I'm for victim's rights here!!!"
also MackDaddyBrown
I must say: of all the alters, I do appreciate your willingness to stick with the illusion
I'm done with this, clown. Have a nice day.This post was edited on 1/5/23 at 3:00 pm
Posted on 1/5/23 at 3:01 pm to EKG
Kentucky is so lucky
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News