Started By
Message
2
Posted on 7/26/11 at 8:18 pm to Bellabama
Posted on 7/26/11 at 8:18 pm to PipeHog
filters, can't see facebook. 
Posted on 7/26/11 at 8:18 pm to Bellabama
quote:
I can go buy a Michael Dyer Autographed photograph for $25.... I just googled it.
Fwiw, they had a news special here in Atlanta the other night showing these fake autographs and his was one as well as some from all the sec schools.
Posted on 7/26/11 at 8:18 pm to Bellabama
quote:
Right after that, I said no more IM'ing.
So changing the rules after you've violated comes natural to you or did you learn that from observations?
Posted on 7/26/11 at 8:18 pm to chilld28
Posted on 7/26/11 at 8:18 pm to CFBFAN1121
quote:
And I'm calling total BS on that disassociation letter
SO, UA faked a letter and sent it out to the media?
quote:
An important letter like that from a big time program would've been sent certified mail to prove receipt of letter
I guess they didn't cover personal service on Law and Order last night. quote:
LOL at it being 'hand delivered'
This isn't a complaint or anything like that. You have a non-minor who can attest at a administrative hearing, like a NCAA committee meeting, that they personally served it upon Tom. Hell, they may have even sent a Cert. one as well as backup..
Posted on 7/26/11 at 8:19 pm to PipeHog
quote:
Where can I get one of these rings?
That should be a "deal with it" pic
Posted on 7/26/11 at 8:19 pm to chilld28
quote:
Labels: clay 'fail' travis, compliance, deflection, fail, ITAT, obsession, outkicthecoverage, Suitgate, Suitgatefail
Posted on 7/26/11 at 8:19 pm to Alahunter
Well you are up on all things Auburn, so I'm sure you know what's going on between them and the NCAA.
Posted on 7/26/11 at 8:19 pm to NBamaAlum
Posted on 7/26/11 at 8:19 pm to Alahunter
So, the ncaa's decision based on info au gave them is the end of the story, right?
This post was edited on 7/26/11 at 8:21 pm
Posted on 7/26/11 at 8:21 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
So, now you're trying to claim this wasn't dealt with 8 months ago?
No, i'm asking a very logical question, when this story first broke, why not mention the disassociation from the beginning? Why wait a few days and say "oh yea, forgot to tell yall, we disassociated ourselves from him"
I'm just asking the same questions bammers would ask if this were AU's compliance dept
Still, lol at the non certified letter, how convenient that it was hand delivered and can't be verified.
Posted on 7/26/11 at 8:21 pm to Vince
I don't really care Vince. All I know is that I've been trying to get you to stop flaming or IMing, or whatever you have been doing now for 3 pages, and you won't stop.
Posted on 7/26/11 at 8:21 pm to WDE24
Just stating how it's played out to date. Bama has been forthcoming, showing actions, being open about things. Auburn has been no comment, garbage, energy vampire. They haven't exactly been open about any part of it, from the beginning. There's a pretty stark contrast in how both have played out in how the University's handled things. One open and honest, the other huddled and suspicious.
Posted on 7/26/11 at 8:23 pm to Alahunter
Well UA should be upfront about everything or else the NCAA will drop severe penalties on the football program.
Posted on 7/26/11 at 8:24 pm to WDE24
quote:
So, the ncaa's decision based on info au gave them is the end of the story, right?
Concerning the eligibility of Cam, sure. Is any other arm looking into things now?
As a aside, I'm sure the NCAA will review this and UA's actions. Wanna switch situations? I don't..
Posted on 7/26/11 at 8:24 pm to Alahunter
quote:
One open and honest, the other huddled and suspicious.
So did they or did they not tell the SEC?
Posted on 7/26/11 at 8:24 pm to MsGarrison
I cant wait till August when the big story drops 
Posted on 7/26/11 at 8:24 pm to NYCAuburn
Lol this story starts up and all of the sudden every SEC player that's signed something is saying it's not his signature.
Page 41 of 61
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News