Started By
Message
re: UPDATE..Bogus National Title claims: Alabama claims 18 but most are questionable
Posted on 4/5/21 at 12:17 pm to elposter
Posted on 4/5/21 at 12:17 pm to elposter
quote:
This is my favorite thread on this forum. Since Chicken posted this thread to troll Bama fans in 2013 he’s had to update it with 3 more Bama national titles. The troll thread has turned into an ongoing homage to Bama football. It’s the gift that keeps on giving.
I fricking love this thread. "But most are questionable."
0
Posted on 4/5/21 at 12:19 pm to Nitro Express
I see A1abana basketball still hasn’t made a Final Four since the dawn of time. Very cool 
Posted on 4/5/21 at 12:23 pm to WilliamTaylor21
quote:
WilliamTaylor21
Posted on 4/5/21 at 12:26 pm to elposter
quote:
This is my favorite thread on this forum. Since Chicken posted this thread to troll Bama fans in 2013 he’s had to update it with 3 more Bama national titles. The troll thread has turned into an ongoing homage to Bama football. It’s the gift that keeps on giving.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 12:29 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
you should sticky this
Did you notice 1957 is no longer listed for Auburn based on that criteria?
Posted on 4/5/21 at 12:30 pm to elposter
quote:
This is my favorite thread on this forum. Since Chicken posted this thread to troll Bama fans in 2013 he’s had to update it with 3 more Bama national titles. The troll thread has turned into an ongoing homage to Bama football. It’s the gift that keeps on giving.
Aaaaaan Alabama fans that c o n t I n u e to post about LSU pay an ongoing homage to the tigers as well.
You’re right....this tigerdroppings website is great.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 12:33 pm to dstone12
quote:
You’re right....this tigerdroppings website is great.
Tigerdroppings.com and SECRant.com have different web addresses, bud. This is not tigerdroppings.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 12:35 pm to Nitro Express
It’s not technically part of TD but it’s still the same. You wouldn’t be able to post on 2 different websites using the same account created on one, if it was two completely unrelated sites.
This post was edited on 4/5/21 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 4/5/21 at 12:37 pm to 1BamaRTR
quote:
It’s not technically part of TG
That settles it then.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 12:49 pm to Nitro Express
quote:I guess you keep the guy employed that wrote this very thread then.
hat settles it then.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 12:53 pm to dstone12
quote:
know how I know you don't watch much football?
Know how I know you don't know much about image hosting?
Posted on 4/5/21 at 1:01 pm to dstone12
quote:
I guess you keep the guy employed that wrote this very thread then.
Sure, sure, but that doesn't make this an LSU website. Tigerdroppings is an LSU website.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 1:13 pm to Nitro Express
quote:no one is telling you that you can’t post here, sweet heart.
Sure, sure, but that doesn't make this an LSU website. Tigerdroppings is an LSU website
It’s not that he owns it.
Listen here:
You bama boys make this an LSU website since you melt about LSU on the frequents, here.
But then claim it’s not an LSU/sec forum. It’s laughable.
80 percent of your threads involve LSU. But let’s ignore that
This post was edited on 4/5/21 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 4/5/21 at 2:27 pm to dstone12
quote:
sweet heart
I'm not gay. Save your passes for Ms. Garrison.
quote:
You bama boys make this an LSU website since you melt about LSU on the frequents, here.
LSU fans melt win or lose. We will be here to enjoy it.
quote:
But then claim it’s not an LSU/sec forum. It’s laughable.
Because it's not. Tigerdroppings is an LSU forum.
quote:
80 percent of your threads involve LSU. But let’s ignore that
Pot, have I introduced you to kettle?
Posted on 4/5/21 at 3:16 pm to Chicken
Chicken doing the Lawds work.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 4:06 pm to Nitro Express
quote:
LSU fans melt win or lose. We will be here to enjoy it.
You don’t know what melt means.
quote:
Because it's not. Tigerdroppings is an LSU forum.
You weren’t smart enough to understand that...ahem, you make this an LSU site by the number of melts( even though you don’t understand what it means) about LSU y’all actually have.
This thread alone has been a MONTHS LONG melt from Alabama posters.
Try denying that.
Or don’t
This post was edited on 4/5/21 at 4:07 pm
Posted on 4/5/21 at 4:15 pm to dstone12
quote:
You don’t know what melt means.
LSU fans have taught us well
quote:
You weren’t smart enough to understand that...ahem, you make this an LSU site by the number of melts( even though you don’t understand what it means) about LSU y’all actually have.
quote:
This thread alone has been a MONTHS LONG melt from Alabama posters.
Hey genius, this thread was started by an LSU fan melting over BAMA's success. BAMA's unrivaled success.
BAMA's success cannot be challenged no matter what method is employed to count championships. BAMA is always #1, so deal with it, or not. This thread is the LSU melt of all LSU melts. You're only adding to it's meltiness.
This post was edited on 4/5/21 at 4:16 pm
Posted on 4/5/21 at 4:50 pm to Nitro Express
The LSU fans that own both websites appreciate your patronage sending them money to give to TAF.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 4:52 pm to Nitro Express
quote:
Hey genius, this thread was started by an LSU fan melting over BAMA's success.
Hey genius,
Ever seen a thread started by, well you’n’yours about LSUs 2019 best team of all time?
Honestly Try answering that.
Then holler back about if LSU fans melted about it for months on one thread. ......like this one.
Not smart nitro. Typical but Not smart. 1300 posts later on this thread and HERE YOU ARE.
What a dumbass
This post was edited on 4/5/21 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 4/5/21 at 6:05 pm to Chicken
Not to defend the Tide, but in 1966 they were undefeated and for political reasons they went uncrowned. I think 1945 or so was another undefeated squad.
1979 was certainly legit. They were undefeated.
The only one I think is truly ridiculous is 1941.
Why they include that one is a mystery.
So I would take away 1964, 1973, and 1941, but give them 1945 and 1966.
Also I might give them 1977.
1979 was certainly legit. They were undefeated.
The only one I think is truly ridiculous is 1941.
Why they include that one is a mystery.
So I would take away 1964, 1973, and 1941, but give them 1945 and 1966.
Also I might give them 1977.
Page 64 of 117
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News