Started By
Message
re: Update: F UCK Alabama!
Posted on 5/16/25 at 9:49 pm to captdalton
Posted on 5/16/25 at 9:49 pm to captdalton
Dipshit Dalton is still here?




Posted on 5/16/25 at 10:38 pm to captdalton
quote:
You got a bad matchup in this thread.
That's for sure, me vs some IRL Bamatards
Posted on 5/16/25 at 10:57 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
That's for sure, me vs some IRL Bamatards
You have a 100 year legacy of losing against Bamatards.
Posted on 5/16/25 at 11:00 pm to WilliamTaylor21
quote:some fish love the taste of the hook
Dipshit Dalton is still here?

Posted on 5/16/25 at 11:06 pm to NFLSU
"in 2019"?? Huh? That was practically the Jurassic period in college football years. Uh, you do realize in 2022 (the last time the 2 teams met, we prison raped the pussycats by 20? 

Posted on 5/17/25 at 4:30 am to SouthernInsanity
quote:If you consider curb stomping the bayou pooosies at home, at night a consolation prize -- ok I'll take it every time.
consolation prize.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 11:19 am to 3down10
quote:
FEI had Alabama #9 and LSU #14
F+ had Alabama #8 and LSU #14
SP+ had Alabama #9 and LSU #14
No clue what the hell these things are
quote:
These are the only ranking metrics of value for team strength.
According to who?
Posted on 5/17/25 at 11:23 am to Gen Patton
quote:
\No clue what the hell these things are
Not surprising.
quote:
According to who?
According to someone who has written ranking software that predicted the winners of games with 70-75% accuracy and knows the fallacies most systems inevitable use in their rankings that makes them shite.
I'll demonstrate the #1 reason why 99% of SoS rankings are dog shite and maybe teach you something about numbers.
The most popular method for SoS, outside win% which is even worse, is to take the team strength/power score and then get an average strength teams face. Seems fine on the surface, but in reality it's not.
2 team schedule to make it easy to understand.
1 team plays teams ranked #49 and #50.
The other team plays teams ranked #1 and #101.
Which schedule is more difficult? Well to any human, playing the #1 team is obviously more difficult. A good team on that schedule should be expected to have 1 loss. Meanwhile, a good team on the other schedule shouldn't have any losses.
Yet the systems that use averages will say the opposite. They will claim the schedule ranked #49 and #50 are slightly more difficult. The system I mentioned does not use averages. Instead it uses expected losses and will correctly identify that the schedule with the #1 teams is not only more difficult, but much more difficult.
Not everyone who posts on this forum is dumb. Some of us know shite.
This post was edited on 5/17/25 at 11:28 am
Posted on 5/17/25 at 11:24 am to Gen Patton
quote:
No clue what the hell these things are
If only someone knew how to use Google.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 11:26 am to WilliamTaylor21
quote:
Dipshit Dalton is still here?
I can’t believe this thread is still going.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 1:28 pm to 3down10
Well I do know that Alabama lost 2 of their last 3 games and scored only 16 total points in those 2 losses and gave up 43 despite being this top 10 defense according to the stat rankings while LSU won the last 3 games of their season, won their bowl game, and beat 2 of the 4 teams that beat Alabama and looked good doing it. 

Posted on 5/17/25 at 1:39 pm to WilliamTaylor21
I love ya William, your stuff always made me chuckle, but uh...sorry dude, I think you've blown your load, figuratively speaking and have finally rolled on over the hill.
Even the LSU fans are saying your last few attempts have been face-plants, and this one was kinda a flop. Time to change things up or ride off into the sunset while you're still respected. Just trying to help ya out.
Even the LSU fans are saying your last few attempts have been face-plants, and this one was kinda a flop. Time to change things up or ride off into the sunset while you're still respected. Just trying to help ya out.

Posted on 5/17/25 at 1:52 pm to Gen Patton
quote:
Well I do know that Alabama lost 2 of their last 3 games and scored only 16 total points in those 2 losses and gave up 43 despite being this top 10 defense according to the stat rankings while LSU won the last 3 games of their season, won their bowl game, and beat 2 of the 4 teams that beat Alabama and looked good doing it.
Ok let's start with the basics.
The regular season is 12 games, not 3. Then after that it goes into the post season where depending on how good your team is, you'll get 1 or more decent opponents.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:08 pm to 3down10
quote:
goes into the post season where depending on how good your team is, you'll get 1 or more decent opponents
You got a 7-5 Michigan team and, technically, lost to the Michigan Wolverines twice in the same calendar year
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:15 pm to Gen Patton
quote:
You got a 7-5 Michigan team and, technically, lost to the Michigan Wolverines twice in the same calendar year
According to you, Michigan is awesome. They finished the season with 3 wins. Starting with a 40+ point blowout victory over Northwestern. Then followed that up with a win over the eventual National Champions Ohio St before beating Alabama in the bowl game.

Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:17 pm to Gen Patton
quote:not just lost twice, but lost TWO BOWL GAMES in the same calendar year
Michigan Wolverines twice in the same calendar year

Posted on 5/17/25 at 4:41 pm to AuburnTigers
quote:
BOWL GAME
What is something Auburn has not won in 7 years. Maybe even worse, Auburn is 2-8 in bowl games over the past 12 seasons. It is surprising that an Auburn fan would chime in when discussing bowl games.
Seven years since a bowl win. That is the longest drought of any SEC football program. Auburn has become the worst football program in the SEC.
Back to top
