Started By
Message

Truth is, if Lanning or Sark said yes, non-gumps would’ve been better off.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 9:11 am
Posted on 1/13/24 at 9:11 am
Bama got the best guy by default.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 9:12 am to TigerProphet
quote:
Bama got the best guy by default.
Based on your other takes, I support this post.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 9:12 am to TigerProphet
Nobody will know until down the road.
We’ll see how the current roster and recruiting class holds together, and we’ll see how he recruits while coaching in the south for the first time.
We’ll see how the current roster and recruiting class holds together, and we’ll see how he recruits while coaching in the south for the first time.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 9:14 am to TigerProphet
What? I'm extremely happy that they didn't get Lanning, Sark, or Norvell. The DeBoer hire is a risk. Not a huge risk, but still a risk.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 9:39 am to TigerProphet
I believe Sexton controlled the narrative,
took advantage and Bama/Byrne got the guy they wanted.
took advantage and Bama/Byrne got the guy they wanted.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 9:40 am to Tigerlaff
quote:
What? I'm extremely happy that they didn't get Lanning, Sark, or Norvell. The DeBoer hire is a risk. Not a huge risk, but still a risk.
Lanning, Sark or Norvell would’ve been a risk as well. Give me the guy who led Washington to its best season ever over the two coaches who were winless against him and the guy who lost his last game by 60.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 9:42 am to TigerProphet
I think that is true regarding Lanning
Posted on 1/13/24 at 10:02 am to AHM21
quote:
Give me the guy who led Washington to its best season ever
Definitely. A program like Bama doesn't need coaches with silly things like experience or regional recruiting connections.
A single season or two should be more than enough evidence of superiority. Doesn't seem flimsy at all.
Proud of you Bama.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 10:04 am to TigerProphet
You'll know in about 3 years or so. DeBoer appears to be the best in-game coach, but mediocre or less at everything else. He's like an inverse Mario Cristobal.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 10:06 am to TigerProphet
quote:
Truth is, if Lanning or Sark said yes, non-gumps would’ve been better off.
Word is, neither were offered the job. But yes, Alabama did get the best guy.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 10:06 am to TigerProphet
Lanning and Sark are far better
Posted on 1/13/24 at 10:11 am to Damone
quote:
Lanning and Sark are far better
Than the guy they both keep losing to?
Ok.
Recruiting is easier now than it's ever been. It's driven almost exclusively by NIL money (which Alabama is filthy with) and the transfer portal.
Recruits and their families won't give a shite about geography. Say the right things in the living room about NIL and it's a done deal.
Popular
Back to top
