Started By
Message
re: Top 3 returning WR passer rating when targeted
Posted on 3/19/18 at 3:38 pm to DanDority
Posted on 3/19/18 at 3:38 pm to DanDority
quote:
Come back after the tourney with this spring camp chest pumping bullshite, sorry you’re on the sidelines
I see now that Arkansas was put out of the tourney early you have changed your team logo over to Kentucky. Wow. Talk about bandwaggoner.
This post was edited on 3/20/18 at 6:42 am
0
Posted on 3/19/18 at 6:41 pm to DawgRff
quote:
The fear is growing
So UGA climbs a mountain -that Bama climbed 7 years in a row- then talks about fear. Forgive me, but that is very Auburn like.
The only fear I sense is the dread that every coach and DC (including Kirby) has when Bama unleashes Tua and the Titanic Trio on the rest of college football.
Posted on 3/19/18 at 10:40 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
Yet hear you are angsting that Georgia might have 2 of the top 3 gus in this one stat. Why does this threaten you so much?
Straws is consumed by the idea that UGA 2017 was nothing but fools gold. His "70% running the ball" claim for Chubb/Sony is Just one of a few false narratives he has created to convince himself of it.
Unfortunately for him, its easy to fact check such claims. Rather than acknowledge being wrong and learning from it, he simply runs away from the discussion, only to return not having learned a thing. This pattern has been repeating itself for months.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 6:45 am to djsdawg
quote:
Unfortunately for him, its easy to fact check such claims. Rather than acknowledge being wrong and learning from it, he simply runs away from the discussion, only to return not having learned a thing. This pattern has been repeating itself for months.
So funny because there is not a single team in the SEC that consumes me so much I have to follow their fans around making up stats to try to make myself feel better about the failures of my own team. Yet he is absolutely eaten up by Georgia's success and can't bring himself to say one positive thing about what Georgia has done.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 7:08 am to djsdawg
For the safety of the players maybe we should cancel football and crown UGA national champs now
Posted on 3/20/18 at 7:52 am to Poker Dough
quote:
safety of the players maybe we should cancel football and crown UGA national champs now
Sounds like a horrible idea but we do have a couple of really good WRs.
This post was edited on 3/20/18 at 7:53 am
Posted on 3/20/18 at 9:22 am to DawgsLife
quote:
making up stats
He once said uga is losing 18 starters from our team.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 9:48 am to DawgsLife
I didn't gloss over anything, it says who made it in the images, and I still think it tells you absolutely nothing.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 9:55 am to Quicksilver
How does passing efficiency tell you nothing about the passing game? Do you consider all stats worthless?
Posted on 3/20/18 at 9:56 am to djsdawg
asterisk: "When targeted..."
Posted on 3/20/18 at 10:02 am to Poker Dough
quote:
For the safety of the players maybe we should cancel football and crown UGA national champs now
As soft as Auburn players are it might not be a bad idea. they seem to get injured badly and often.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 10:02 am to ColoBama
Yes. It takes into account how often a player is targeted. Evens things out.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 10:04 am to Quicksilver
quote:
I didn't gloss over anything, it says who made it in the images, and I still think it tells you absolutely nothing.
You don't have to. There are a lot of statistics that I don't think mean anything. Doesn't keep people from bringing them up or discussing them.
You know...if you don't like his thread or think it is pointless, you could always stay out of it. There are a lot of threads I think tells us nothing. I usually just don't go into them.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 10:06 am to djsdawg
quote:
He once said uga is losing 18 starters from our team.
Seriously? Crap.
That's ok. If he believes that, it will make it that more enjoyable when we spank them again to say we did it with only 4 returning starters.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 10:08 am to ColoBama
quote:
asterisk: "When targeted..."
Yeah. It's hard for a wide receiver to catch the ball when it is not thrown to them.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 10:36 am to DawgsLife
He must be counting Chubb and Michel as 6-7 players.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 10:37 am to DawgsLife
Yeah and it's harder for the QB to throw them the ball when your WRs are 5'9"
Wims was clearly the best WR for UGA last year.
The other guys are just midgets who are quick in space. Draw up a few gadgets for them and they'll make some plays. Gus Malzahn is surely envious. But guys like that are a dime a dozen and they aren't great WRs. Sorry.
Wims was clearly the best WR for UGA last year.
The other guys are just midgets who are quick in space. Draw up a few gadgets for them and they'll make some plays. Gus Malzahn is surely envious. But guys like that are a dime a dozen and they aren't great WRs. Sorry.
This post was edited on 3/20/18 at 10:38 am
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:00 am to SECSolomonGrundy
They are 2 of the best WRs in the sec despite uga not throwing often. This stat reflects that.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:00 am to SECSolomonGrundy
quote:
But guys like that are a dime a dozen and they aren't great WRs
Yes, Antonio Brown is not a great receiver because he’s 5’10”.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:01 am to djsdawg
quote:
They are 2 of the best WRs in the sec despite uga not throwing often. This stat reflects that.
Ehh... I kinda disagree. It’s a little bit easier to have your passer (or i guess receiving in this case) rating high when you’re not targeted as often.
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News