Started By
Message
re: Tigertards better hope they have more than OBJ and Landry
Posted on 11/7/13 at 9:13 am to LSU82BILL
Posted on 11/7/13 at 9:13 am to LSU82BILL
quote:
Uh huh....but Bama's run defense (#7 in the nation and #1 in the SEC) being so good and always taking big early leads doesn't force teams to throw either, right?
The last thing you want to be against Bama's defense is one dimensional.
1
Posted on 11/7/13 at 9:14 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Bama does get pressure. The stats don't show it because their defense is good. They get off the field. They make teams go 3&out thusly they get less chances to get sacks than defense that give up long drives.
Alabama opponents convert 3rd downs 29.52%, Florida 31.25%, Moo St 32.41%. It's an area where LSU really struggles on D (well, besides the other areas..
)
Posted on 11/7/13 at 9:15 am to JayDeerTay84
quote:
So what you are saying is that we have 2 VERY good WR's and a Very good RB.
So man coverage?
Nice....
Not to mention the fullback they're all so fond of, Copeland.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 9:16 am to bmy
quote:
Alabama opponents convert 3rd downs 29.52%, Florida 31.25%, Moo St 32.41%. It's an area where LSU really struggles on D (well, besides the other areas.. )
IMO 3rd downs will make or break lsu. Lsu leads the sec in third down conv% and bama is #1 in opp 3rd down conversion. Something has to give.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 9:18 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
The last thing you want to be against Bama's defense is one dimensional.
Exactly. That's what their run defense is forcing their opponents to become, yet Bama can't get after the QB better than 11 sack in 8 games against opponents that were forced to throw?
Posted on 11/7/13 at 9:20 am to LSU82BILL
quote:
Exactly. That's what their run defense is forcing their opponents to become, yet Bama can't get after the QB better than 11 sack in 8 games against opponents that were forced to throw?
Bama's defense has never been predicated on pressure, but they can't get pressure if need be. Also, bama has had huge leads in most of these games so there is no need to bring pressure to disrupt timing when you're up 21 points.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 9:41 am to CajunRocks
quote:
Evans away from Manziel
Evans is on another planet compared to Landry and Beckham.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 9:46 am to Patton
quote:
Evans is on another planet compared to Landry and Beckham.
As far as "go up and get it" WRs go.. sure. Odell is like 4 receptions and 100 yards behind Evans at this point in the season. Evans is better in the redzone though... that size.
This post was edited on 11/7/13 at 9:46 am
Posted on 11/7/13 at 9:51 am to BamaStepL
quote:
BamaStepL
Serious question, but do you jerk off before every big game? You seem like the type.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 9:56 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Against ole miss OBJr had 70 yards
Would you give up those 70 yards to get back the 3 turnovers? I sure would. It's not about shutting OBJ and Landry down, it's about forcing Mett to make bad decisions, something he has done the last two games.
If LSU is going to win this game, they can't afford to waste possessions and turn the ball over, plain and simple.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 9:58 am to oldcharlie8
quote:
it's fans like you that give bama a bad wrap among tiger fans.
Implies Bama needs LSU's respect. If anything LSU is the whiny little boy trying so hard to get big brother's attention while big brother is dealing with the non-adopted little brother.
Preciate your interest in the game.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 10:08 am to BamaStepL
If its true what you say, then I guess there will be a lot of "pass-interference" calls agains Bama.
No way you have anybody that will cover step for step.
No way you have anybody that will cover step for step.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 10:11 am to Swampking
quote:
If its true what you say, then I guess there will be a lot of "pass-interference" calls agains Bama.
No way you have anybody that will cover step for step.
first off.. it's gonna be more of an LSU-UGA type game. they'll let the players play. we'll get hosed on at least once in ttown.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 10:15 am to bmy
pretty fricking fireplace, i need to start working on building my classy arse library
This post was edited on 11/7/13 at 10:16 am
Posted on 11/7/13 at 10:39 am to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
Implies Bama needs LSU's respect. If anything LSU is the whiny little boy trying so hard to get big brother's attention while big brother is dealing with the non-adopted little brother.
The whining little boy who has beaten big brother 9 of the past 14 regular season games and 6 of the past 8 in BDS but hasn't gotten their "attention"? Maybe big brother has ADHD? And all this time we just thought it was a matter of mental retardation. Preciate your blind arrogance.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 10:42 am to BamaStepL
Go back to blowing your uncle Gump.
Internet is not your thing.
Internet is not your thing.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 10:43 am to LSU82BILL
quote:
The whining little boy who has beaten big brother 9 of the past 14 regular season games and 6 of the past 8 in BDS but hasn't gotten their "attention"? Maybe big brother has ADHD? And all this time we just thought it was a matter of mental retardation. Preciate your blind arrogance.
Look at the all time record. It isn't even close.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 10:46 am to BamaStepL
quote:
The number of the passes that go to these 2 are extraordinarily high.. in the off week I'm sure Saban/Smart have come up with a plan to take away the 1st 2 options after the snap... LSU OL will have to hold up longer to get the ball to Mett's chosen 2... he won't have long. Mett almost doesn't even look to spread the ball around, no other WR has over 10 catches.. Bama will punish that offense and this game will likely get ugly... Mett and his WR Duo will have to have a big game anyway just to keep up.. but knowing that we will scheme to take away what LSu likes to do. And now understanding that Mett is capable of making plays.. we won't lay off him like last year.
I agree with you. I'd sell out on stopping the passing game....rush three guys, drop the linebackers on every play........the secret is out...we don't have "more than OBJ and Landry" and we certainly have nobody capable of running the football.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 10:47 am to AllBamaDoesIsWin
Bama Fans are such ignorant pieces of shite
Posted on 11/7/13 at 10:52 am to Rickdaddy4188
I imagine amount of plays the defense plays on, will limit the amount of sacks, TFL, or any other measurable stat.
Alabama's defense has the 3rd fewest amount of plays (467). 11 sacks results in 2.3% of all plays result in a sack.
Comparisons:
LSU 621 plays 20 sacks - 3.2%
Virginia Tech 561 plays 28 sacks - 4.9%
Clemson - 637 plays 30 sacks(#1) - 4.7%
Georgia - 559 plays 23 sacks - 4.1%
Auburn - 646 plays 21 sacks - 3.2%
Texas A&M - 657 plays 16 sacks - 2.4%
So, it is lower, but not on a large a scale as people put it.
Upon thinking about this "amount of plays", I went and grabbed info on plays vs. Sacks, INT's, Force Fumbles, TFL, PBU's, and even incomplets with PBU's and INT's taken out. A % of defensive plays that resulted in a negative or null play. I even threw in forcing the other team to punt.
Here's a extra long spreadsheet that hopefully works
LINK
Defensive Plays vs Sacks, PBU's (includes passes defended and INT's), Tackle for Losses, Forced Fumbles, Incompletes (minus the PBU's), and opponent punts. Each with a %, and the column on the far right is all of it against amount of plays.
Of course, this is just cold stats, and doesn't take account of quality of opponents. Because Baylor and Clemson "has" a better defense than almost everyone.
Too many STAAAATS. Why am I even posting this here, no one will care
Alabama's defense has the 3rd fewest amount of plays (467). 11 sacks results in 2.3% of all plays result in a sack.
Comparisons:
LSU 621 plays 20 sacks - 3.2%
Virginia Tech 561 plays 28 sacks - 4.9%
Clemson - 637 plays 30 sacks(#1) - 4.7%
Georgia - 559 plays 23 sacks - 4.1%
Auburn - 646 plays 21 sacks - 3.2%
Texas A&M - 657 plays 16 sacks - 2.4%
So, it is lower, but not on a large a scale as people put it.
Upon thinking about this "amount of plays", I went and grabbed info on plays vs. Sacks, INT's, Force Fumbles, TFL, PBU's, and even incomplets with PBU's and INT's taken out. A % of defensive plays that resulted in a negative or null play. I even threw in forcing the other team to punt.
Here's a extra long spreadsheet that hopefully works
LINK
Defensive Plays vs Sacks, PBU's (includes passes defended and INT's), Tackle for Losses, Forced Fumbles, Incompletes (minus the PBU's), and opponent punts. Each with a %, and the column on the far right is all of it against amount of plays.
Of course, this is just cold stats, and doesn't take account of quality of opponents. Because Baylor and Clemson "has" a better defense than almost everyone.
Too many STAAAATS. Why am I even posting this here, no one will care
This post was edited on 11/7/13 at 10:53 am
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News