Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/10/17 at 11:40 am to FinebaumsHair
If i were Auburn i would get to the head of that line.
Posted on 9/10/17 at 11:41 am to gamecocks22
I think he is a good coach and recruiter. Good fit for sc.
Posted on 9/10/17 at 11:59 am to 19812016
quote:
So you think Muschamp is about to do something that has never happened before in the history of Scar football?
Shut y'all the frick up?
Jesus himself couldn't pull that one off.
Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:14 pm to Carolina_Girl
possibly the most underrated coach in the sec. can't blame him for uf. he had to rebuild that program after urban's thugs trashed it.
Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:18 pm to Switzerland
I would take him in a heart beat at AU. He is a good fit at AU
Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:26 pm to gamecocks22
I thought it was a bad hire after he couldn't win at Florida, but he's proving me wrong so far. He seems to be doing a good job with decent talent.
It does take a good QB to be successful, and he has one.
It does take a good QB to be successful, and he has one.
Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:26 pm to gamecocks22
quote:
With the said whats the rants thoughts on Boom. I dont blame UF for canning him, they had to. He seems to be made to be a coach.
Seems to have learned somethings along the way as most coaches do. If he turns USCe around he might get a better gig and then again he might stay put... The key is can he get to the SECCG.
Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:27 pm to 19812016
I'm sure clemson fans thought Dabo would win a national championship when he was hired 
Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:28 pm to gamecocks22
UF made a mistake - he is a really good coach
I expect SC to be a tough out for everyone moving forward
He's better than the shark fricker that replaced him at UF
I expect SC to be a tough out for everyone moving forward
He's better than the shark fricker that replaced him at UF
Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:31 pm to FinebaumsHair
Muschamp was clearly th problem at UF. He may have learned from his experience that is yet to be determined . UF has won the east every year since he left , that's something he was never able to do. There was very little talent on offense when Mac took over.
You guys are getting ahead of your self with this USCe hype . Let's see them beat some good teams first. Missouri is likely the worse team in the east .
You guys are getting ahead of your self with this USCe hype . Let's see them beat some good teams first. Missouri is likely the worse team in the east .
Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:32 pm to tjv305
quote:
UF has won the east every year since he left
How's he doing this year without Muschamps players?
Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:34 pm to boXerrumble
quote:
And yes, I'm at the point where I am considering I'd rather him have stayed than Cormac McSharkFricker take the job.
It did cross my mind what may have happened with him at the helm in 2015. Does Grier get off the rails (pun kinda intended) and so on if there is no transition? The OL would have still been crap either way. I never hated him either. The few times I interacted with him while I was at UF, I always thought he was a really nice guy, and while I think there were some problems, I also think a lot of Florida fans on message boards don't help. I also never bought that he was handcuffing the offense except for maybe the 2012 season.
The season obviously has to play out. I know Gators seem under the impression that we are going to lose every game, but UF did lose to pretty good team and may actually still have a decent season. Also SCar looks good on offense, but beating Mizzou isn't all that impressive. So we'll see, but for me at least, there is a very real possibility of getting to December and finding myself wishing Muschamp was still in Gainesville. I was never a hardcore Champ hater, though I was onboard when he left, but I still am surprised to find that possibility exists.
Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:38 pm to gamecocks22
Perfect fit for USC. Y'all are in good hands. He's a good defensive coach and he can recruit. He wasn't right fit for a UF not even close. I knew that it was a very good hire when it was announced.
Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:42 pm to dcbl
quote:
He's better than the shark fricker that replaced him at UF
Have sex with a shark one time, and you never hear the end of it.
Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:43 pm to gamecocks22
quote:
top tier of SEC coaches
I don't disagree, but I don't completely agree either. This is butterteeth's third season at Florida, Smart's second season at Georgia, Odom's first season at Mizzou, Ed O's first full season as head coach at LSU, and our head coach resigned in the offseason. There are plenty of new to relatively new faces in the league, so it is a little difficult to say that Muschamp is a top tier coach with the coaching parody going in within the conference.
Plus, the jury is still out on Muschamp IMO. He is 8-7 through his first 15 games, currently has a losing SEC record, finished fifth in a very non-competitive East in his first season, and lost his only bowl game appearance.
At this point, I would put Saban, Mullen, and Malzahn above Muschamp, and would put Muschamp on the same level as Bert, McElwain, and Orgeron.
In support of Muschamp - he has definitely made South Carolina a team to watch out for, and with his talent on the recruiting trail, I can see SC making some noise in the SEC in the coming years. Best of luck to him.
This post was edited on 9/10/17 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:48 pm to gamecocks22
He's done a great job at USC so far. I certainly miss his recruiting prowess.
Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:50 pm to dcbl
quote:
UF made a mistake
Are we really gonna do this again?
Posted on 9/10/17 at 4:41 pm to gamecocks22
My opinion is that the UF gator fanbase didn't give him enough time, but then with him succeeding Meyer with the success he had, that's not entirely unreasonable either.
Muschamp was a HC that had to learn as he went. I truly think he had a bead on how to build a great defensive-minded team, but needed some seasoning when it comes to building consistent offenses.
Also, I think the decision to bring in Charlie Weis as the OC was a bad move on his part, and not just because Weis was there only one season. The Meyer offenses were all about dual-threat QBs and slot receivers and TEs, and Weis wanted a more pro-style offense with pocket passers (Brantley) and a full-out WR passing attack.
Except UF had no WR depth on the roster, and whatever offensive talent CWM inherited from Meyer wasn't geared for that offense. Then the OL has issues with injury and under-achieving, and then before you knew it, Weis is gone.
So the defense at UF was being built up like it should, but the offensive identity was being constantly screwed around with, and the QB talent that was being brought in couldn't get settled into anything consistent.
Muschamp has stated that had he hired Roper his first year at UF, that he'd still be at UF as HC today. I think he had to take some learning chances with offensive coordinators and systems when he came to UF, and it burned him. He didn't really have a set idea on an offensive philosophy or philosophies that would work for him PRIOR to becoming a HC, so that he could target coordinators and assistants that would make that philosophy work successfully from the very start. Then he and his staff could recruit for that philosophy from the very start, and begin to build an offensive identity that the team could win with.
Instead, Muschamp had to flail a little bit there while at UF, and the UF fanbase wasn't going to give him time to figure it out, even though it was after all, his very first job as a HC of an entire program. So it was perhaps destined to fail, but it doesn't write the final word on Muschamp's career as a HC. He could have gone to a program with lesser expectations and perhaps survived that transition, and still be there coaching that program to winning seasons and building his resume as a HC. But it is what it is, regarding Florida......
Muschamp was a HC that had to learn as he went. I truly think he had a bead on how to build a great defensive-minded team, but needed some seasoning when it comes to building consistent offenses.
Also, I think the decision to bring in Charlie Weis as the OC was a bad move on his part, and not just because Weis was there only one season. The Meyer offenses were all about dual-threat QBs and slot receivers and TEs, and Weis wanted a more pro-style offense with pocket passers (Brantley) and a full-out WR passing attack.
Except UF had no WR depth on the roster, and whatever offensive talent CWM inherited from Meyer wasn't geared for that offense. Then the OL has issues with injury and under-achieving, and then before you knew it, Weis is gone.
So the defense at UF was being built up like it should, but the offensive identity was being constantly screwed around with, and the QB talent that was being brought in couldn't get settled into anything consistent.
Muschamp has stated that had he hired Roper his first year at UF, that he'd still be at UF as HC today. I think he had to take some learning chances with offensive coordinators and systems when he came to UF, and it burned him. He didn't really have a set idea on an offensive philosophy or philosophies that would work for him PRIOR to becoming a HC, so that he could target coordinators and assistants that would make that philosophy work successfully from the very start. Then he and his staff could recruit for that philosophy from the very start, and begin to build an offensive identity that the team could win with.
Instead, Muschamp had to flail a little bit there while at UF, and the UF fanbase wasn't going to give him time to figure it out, even though it was after all, his very first job as a HC of an entire program. So it was perhaps destined to fail, but it doesn't write the final word on Muschamp's career as a HC. He could have gone to a program with lesser expectations and perhaps survived that transition, and still be there coaching that program to winning seasons and building his resume as a HC. But it is what it is, regarding Florida......
Posted on 9/10/17 at 4:59 pm to gamecocks22
quote:
Nice logic. Everyone but LSU fans would take him over "O".
That may change after this year though because all anyone is basing Coach O on is his time at Ole Miss.
At this moment, I can't really say for sure who I'd take between the two. Both are better than what their last head coaching gigs would lend you to believe. That much has already been proven. Just how good either of them are is still up in the air.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News