Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/14/25 at 9:29 pm to tide06
quote:
I was asked to provide examples of issues on defense.
I’ve provided a number of them.
Not really.
You just said they got outgained yardage wise, which is true, Florida had 40 more yards than LSU. The difference is basically just the last drive.
I blame that more on LSU's offensive struggles than the defense being bad.
Your only other point was a touchdown got called back and that touchdown wouldn't have been scored without the penalty so that point is useless.
quote:
If you want to assume you have a championship level defense without vulnerabilities after getting outgained by a team that threw 5 picks and had numerous other big play opportunities coming off a 16 pt offensive night against a USF team that just lost 42-14 to Miami feel free, I’m not here to argue with you as you clearly have your mind made up.
Impossible to say whether they're championship level or not, too early.
Using transitve property is always a low IQ argument.
Posted on 9/14/25 at 9:30 pm to SidewalkTiger
Ah man you should’ve let him respond to me first
I had Georgia Southern and West Virginia in the mag
I had Georgia Southern and West Virginia in the mag
This post was edited on 9/14/25 at 9:31 pm
Posted on 9/14/25 at 9:54 pm to theballguy
quote:
The rankings system is beyond broken in CFB.
There should be no rankings for another 3-4 weeks, when there is enough information to use.
Just look at this board after week 1.
Specifically LSU and Bama.
Or even that dumb AP voter last week with UF.
Posted on 9/14/25 at 10:02 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
You just said they got outgained yardage wise, which is true, Florida had 40 more yards than LSU. The difference is basically just the last drive.
You got outgained while getting 5 turnovers. That’s almost impossible to pull off.
There were receivers open as I outlined.
But I pointed out the defense gets credit for the takeaways as well.
My only point that I made and that you continue to attack is that there are vulnerabilities on defense that better offenses could potentially take advantage of. The data supports my conclusion. Doesn’t mean they won’t improve.
quote:
Using transitve property is always a low IQ argument.
Looking at how teams perform against other teams relative to how other teams performed against them is the exact methodology that FEI and SP+ use to rank teams and it has been one of the best predictors of games against the spread over the last 10+ years.
Over one game it’s a data point. Over a season it’s an extremely accurate way of describing how good a team is relative to other teams.
Posted on 9/14/25 at 10:09 pm to tide06
Based on your "analysis", every team has fundamental issues on both sides of the ball.
Posted on 9/14/25 at 10:24 pm to UtahCajun
Wait and see. They beat a horrible Va tech and then beat us, the most horribly coached and ill-prepared team in all of D-1. If they a play a legit SEC foe whose players don't quit like Beamers "family" did, then we will see. Big time college football aint family Shane, it's business.
Posted on 9/14/25 at 11:16 pm to theballguy
Great thing about the SEC this year. Almost every team could lose on the road to any other SEC team.
Posted on 9/14/25 at 11:24 pm to theballguy
quote:
Vegas is wrong all the time.
True but they’re right all the time too. More than anyone else.
That you, Yogi?
Posted on 9/15/25 at 12:05 am to theballguy
quote:
Should LSU be #3?
Settle down, Sugar Tits. It’ll all come out in the wash. No sense in wasting your posting gold on a non worthy question.
Are you predicting Vandy to beat LSU? If not, you may want to sit this one out.
This post was edited on 9/15/25 at 12:07 am
Posted on 9/15/25 at 12:20 am to theballguy
Vandy can’t lose, clearly
Posted on 9/15/25 at 4:52 am to Clark14
Let's make a bet. Straight up. How ever much u want.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 5:44 am to theballguy
quote:
#3 can't be favored to lose to #20 can they? The rankings system is beyond broken in CFB
Rankings aren’t power ratings.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 5:46 am to theballguy
quote:
Then Vandy should be ranked ahead of whoever they would be favored to beat. Simple enough.
No, that’s stupid.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 5:49 am to Wolfhound45
quote:Hahahaha
I am seeing (as a minimum) a loss to both Ole Miss and Bama.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 6:05 am to tide06
quote:
There were receivers open as I outlined.
You watched 22 personnel for another schools team in under 24 hours from the game happening?
loser lifePosted on 9/15/25 at 6:43 am to UtahCajun
quote:
Vandy is an underrated team.
LSU hasn’t played 2 teams as shitty as South Carolina and VT. Had to call Vandy underrated.
This post was edited on 9/15/25 at 6:44 am
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News