Started By
Message
Posted on 6/11/19 at 2:29 pm to BHMKyle
Keep A&M, SEC needs Texas, let Ark and Mizzou go back to Big 12
Ark would get their rivalry with Texas back and Mizzou and Kansas would be back together.
Ark would get their rivalry with Texas back and Mizzou and Kansas would be back together.
Posted on 6/11/19 at 3:10 pm to BHMKyle
I'd be for it if the permanent rivalries were an opt-in option for the schools. I'd rather LSU play more of the SEC schools on a reg basis than have forced rivalries.
Posted on 6/11/19 at 3:50 pm to TH03
Iowa State Fan
Dallas
Dallas
quote:
The only thing that should change is to kick aTm and Mizzou back out.
Posted on 6/11/19 at 4:24 pm to BHMKyle
Why put ourselves at a disadvantage compared to other conferences?
9 SEC games is a different animal than Big 10 or ACC.
I’d only do this when the conference champ becomes an auto qualifier
9 SEC games is a different animal than Big 10 or ACC.
I’d only do this when the conference champ becomes an auto qualifier
Posted on 6/11/19 at 5:05 pm to dstone12
I can see several ways to split the west into 2 4-team pods, but unsure on the east without breaking up Ala. & Aub..
Posted on 6/11/19 at 5:31 pm to dstone12
"They have to"? Having to win 2 MORE just to MAKE the playoffs is fine by you???
So, say Conf. A puts "Team Name A" with a perfect record who loses to Conf. B candidate "Team Name B" who has, say, 3 loses. You're telling me that due to that 1 game, "Team Name B" deserves to be in the playoffs instead of "Team Name A"?
So, say Conf. A puts "Team Name A" with a perfect record who loses to Conf. B candidate "Team Name B" who has, say, 3 loses. You're telling me that due to that 1 game, "Team Name B" deserves to be in the playoffs instead of "Team Name A"?
Posted on 6/11/19 at 5:40 pm to BHMKyle
As I stated, probably due to a 12 game schedule vrs. OVER 30 when, per you, you've played 10/13 teams.
Posted on 6/11/19 at 5:49 pm to MEd LSU
10 limits UGA, UF, SC, & KY to only 1 game to schedule whomever since #11 is in-state ACC rivalml
But I agree it makes the H/A a non-issue.
But I agree it makes the H/A a non-issue.
This post was edited on 6/11/19 at 5:49 pm
Posted on 6/11/19 at 6:02 pm to ibldprplgld
There is NO format that would make an "opt in" work. I calculated it months ago & those WITH the c/d game rotated H/A ONCE of the other division in 12 years while the "opt-out" group did, I think, 3 full H/A rotations in 15 years. & you think what we have now is bad & criticized by other conferences???
Posted on 6/11/19 at 6:26 pm to southernboisb
quote:
"They have to"? Having to win 2 MORE just to MAKE the playoffs is fine by you???
So, say Conf. A puts "Team Name A" with a perfect record who loses to Conf. B candidate "Team Name B" who has, say, 3 loses. You're telling me that due to that 1 game, "Team Name B" deserves to be in the playoffs instead of "Team Name A"?
For the first question. Yes. Group of five teams don’t play strong schedules. So they need to prove themselves.
For the rest of what you wrote.....
????
Go back and edit this until 35% of us can understand what you are saying.
It would look like this.
Sec. Georgia
Vs
Ucf/northern ill winner
Big10 Michigan
Vs
Pac 10 usc
Big12 okla
Vs
Big east WVU
Acc. Clemson
Vs
Usf/Boise winner
I don’t like conference non champs unless we eliminte conf champ games.
This post was edited on 6/11/19 at 6:36 pm
Posted on 6/11/19 at 6:33 pm to BHMKyle
Georgia you don’t want none of this. The east would get housed currently. I know it’s cyclical. It right now the west is king
Posted on 6/11/19 at 9:36 pm to dstone12
I was saying suppose Conf. B's team with 3 loses BEAT Conf. A's team who was undefeated in the victory round of 1 of the 4-team playoff tournaments you mentioned. You would still give Conf. B's team the CFPlayoffs slot?
This post was edited on 6/11/19 at 9:40 pm
Posted on 6/11/19 at 9:38 pm to dstone12
& I agree that I was under the impression the CFPlayoffs were ONLY for conf. champs. But was puzzled with 5 P5 conf. & only 4 slots.
Posted on 6/11/19 at 10:50 pm to southernboisb
Happens in ncaa tourneys all the time.
If we want to reward the regular season only, we can go back to the 60s.
If we want to reward the regular season only, we can go back to the 60s.
Posted on 6/11/19 at 11:03 pm to TH03
You mad because nobody will invite you to their conference?
Posted on 6/12/19 at 11:00 am to BHMKyle
Disbanding divisions would be the dumbest thing we can possibly do, especially if we are going to expand and add more teams.
It would be an unwieldy mob of teams, and scheduling would be ridiculous with everyone only able to play a portion of the teams.
We need some type of organization like the divisions provide so we're not using a bunch of complex rules to determine which of the four 10-2 teams plays Bama in the championship game each year.
It would be an unwieldy mob of teams, and scheduling would be ridiculous with everyone only able to play a portion of the teams.
We need some type of organization like the divisions provide so we're not using a bunch of complex rules to determine which of the four 10-2 teams plays Bama in the championship game each year.
This post was edited on 6/12/19 at 11:01 am
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News