Started By
Message
re: The real reason LSU finds themselves in this position
Posted on 12/14/20 at 10:34 am to SidewalkTiger
Posted on 12/14/20 at 10:34 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Count the $100 donations noted and if its 10 or more, I'll take a month off. Its that simple. I noticed you were notably absent in that topic.
I've already noted that all you have to do is click on the "See top donations"
you will note that some are anonymous
edit to add link LINK
This post was edited on 12/14/20 at 10:35 am
Posted on 12/14/20 at 10:36 am to BLG
I still want you to explain how you thought Sidewalk deleted his post?
Posted on 12/14/20 at 10:42 am to BLG
quote:
I've already noted that all you have to do is click on the "See top donations"
you will note that some are anonymous
Why would I suddenly base it on the GoFundMe when my original post clearly stated that I was keeping a count based on posters who donated $100 and then posted in the topic?
Again, you're the only person who is confused here. I'm sorry, but I can't be responsible for your inability to understand simple statements.
Posted on 12/14/20 at 11:04 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
you're the only person who is confused here
This is not a true statement about tRant, unless you're only talking about this thread.

Posted on 12/14/20 at 11:12 am to BLG
noted for posterity....
SidewalkTiger
LSU Fan
An undisclosed location
I pledge to not start any SECRant threads for one month if ten posters will donate at least $10 each to this man's GoFundMe.
ETA: I will totally ban myself from SECRant for one month if ten posters donate $100 or more each.
Please comment in the topic if you donate so I will know.
This post was edited on 12/10 at 11:29 am
LINK
note the edit
SidewalkTiger
LSU Fan
An undisclosed location
I pledge to not start any SECRant threads for one month if ten posters will donate at least $10 each to this man's GoFundMe.
ETA: I will totally ban myself from SECRant for one month if ten posters donate $100 or more each.
Please comment in the topic if you donate so I will know.
This post was edited on 12/10 at 11:29 am
LINK
note the edit
This post was edited on 12/14/20 at 11:13 am
Posted on 12/14/20 at 11:16 am to BLG
Dude the post was edited 4 days ago and 18 minutes after the original post. If this edit was this morning you would have something to stand on.
You are not a very smart person.
ETA: you also claimed in this thread that Sidewalk deleted post.
You are not a very smart person.
ETA: you also claimed in this thread that Sidewalk deleted post.
This post was edited on 12/14/20 at 11:18 am
Posted on 12/14/20 at 11:26 am to civiltiger07
As long as you two are going to talk about IQ or being smart, I will advise you about logic and valid comments. He did not state that his pledge was predicated on posters advising him they donated. "Please comment in the topic if you donate so I will know" isn't the same as "This pledge is contingent on your posting in the topic so I will know".
Just because you're too ignorant to understand that doesn't change the fact of the matter.
It's like the other LSU poster said. Nobody really expected him to stand by it anyway. Still, don't go chiding another poster about trust when you aren't trustworthy yourself.
Just because you're too ignorant to understand that doesn't change the fact of the matter.
It's like the other LSU poster said. Nobody really expected him to stand by it anyway. Still, don't go chiding another poster about trust when you aren't trustworthy yourself.
Posted on 12/14/20 at 11:27 am to BLG
quote:
He did not state that his pledge was predicated on posters advising him they donated. "Please comment in the topic if you donate so I will know" isn't the same as "This pledge is contingent on your posting in the topic so I will know".
The non low IQ posters understood that's what was meant, hence the reason they commented when they donated.
I'm sorry I didn't spell it all out for you?
Posted on 12/14/20 at 11:33 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
The non low IQ posters understood that's what was meant, hence the reason they commented when they donated.
no. Just because you're too uneducated to know about logic and valid statements doesn't change the fact of their validity. A man should say what he means and mean what he says (as if). "Everybody understood" is something an ignorant man counts on.
The LSU poster is right. Nobody expected you to live up to it.
This post was edited on 12/14/20 at 11:34 am
Posted on 12/14/20 at 11:33 am to C Nite
1. Clemson did not have the same exact season
2.LSU was historically the greatest college football team in every way possible.
3. LSU has won 3 National Championships since the year 2000, we played for 4. so we have been here before. Only Alabama has more.
4. Saying that there is some truth in your words, but that’s what fans do.
2.LSU was historically the greatest college football team in every way possible.
3. LSU has won 3 National Championships since the year 2000, we played for 4. so we have been here before. Only Alabama has more.
4. Saying that there is some truth in your words, but that’s what fans do.
Posted on 12/14/20 at 11:35 am to BLG
quote:
The LSU poster is right. Nobody expected you to live up to it.
I've stated several times that if you find ten posters who met my criteria, then I will honor my pledge.
Posted on 12/14/20 at 11:39 am to BLG
You’re the one that has changed positions multiple times in this thread.
He deleted his post
He edited his post
He never meant to ban himself
He deleted his post
He edited his post
He never meant to ban himself
This post was edited on 12/14/20 at 11:40 am
Posted on 12/14/20 at 12:11 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
SidewalkTiger
Be careful, that whole thing is sketchy and I could totally see some untrustworthy folks trying to claim a $100 donation just to get a quality LSU poster off the board.
Popular
Back to top
