Started By
Message
re: The committee got it right
Posted on 12/2/18 at 1:44 pm to Weagle25
Posted on 12/2/18 at 1:44 pm to Weagle25
quote:
No you made the argument that ND couldn’t be in if there’s a requirement to win the conference you’re in.
No, I didn't. I made a statement, followed by your argument.
You made it, not me. Own it.
1
Posted on 12/2/18 at 1:45 pm to WG_Dawg
They had Auburn in with 2 losses so there goes that argument.
Posted on 12/2/18 at 1:46 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
I’m owning it because it’s still not wrong.
Don’t win your conference and don’t get in the playoffs. Is consistent with Notre Dame being in the playoff
Just keep ignoring the parts of my post that aren’t convenient to you
Don’t win your conference and don’t get in the playoffs. Is consistent with Notre Dame being in the playoff
Just keep ignoring the parts of my post that aren’t convenient to you
This post was edited on 12/2/18 at 1:48 pm
Posted on 12/2/18 at 1:48 pm to Weagle25
quote:
They had Auburn in with 2 losses so there goes that argument.
when did auburn make the playoffs?
Posted on 12/2/18 at 1:49 pm to Weagle25
quote:
Don’t win your conference and don’t get in the playoffs. Is consistent with Notre Dame being in the playoff
No it isn't.
You need to reword it if you want it to say what you think it says.
Posted on 12/2/18 at 1:50 pm to Weagle25
quote:
Just keep ignoring the parts of my post that aren’t convenient to you
Make a coherent point.
Posted on 12/2/18 at 1:52 pm to WG_Dawg
Not only did the committee have us in the top 4 they had us at number 2 going into the SECCG
So because Auburn bailed them out, you’re going to make the argument that they’re just not allowing 2 loss teams in. That’s comical.
So because Auburn bailed them out, you’re going to make the argument that they’re just not allowing 2 loss teams in. That’s comical.
Posted on 12/2/18 at 1:55 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
No it isn't.
Yes it is.
They don’t have a conference. There’s no conference for them to not win.
Posted on 12/2/18 at 1:56 pm to Weagle25
Your logic sucks, or at least your application of it. You need to reword your argument because it doesn't say what you think it says.
Posted on 12/2/18 at 1:58 pm to AUCE05
quote:
The SEC was down this year, and as a result Bama is over rated. OU will drop 60 on Bama's D. And Tua folds under pressure. Bookmark this post.
Down? Based on what? A 5 loss SEC team beat the PAC 12 Champion.
quote:
Bookmark this post.
Why? it's just your opinion.
A team that lost by 29 points to a 6-6 team won their conference and narrowly missed the playoffs. If you watched the BIG 12 Conference game yesterday, you know that Oklahoma nor Texas is really all the good.
Are we as strong as were were in our heyday? maybe not. It's hard to compare the two. But the SEC is still the strongest conference out there, and there really isn't any argument there.
Posted on 12/2/18 at 2:03 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
A 5 loss SEC team beat the PAC 12 Champion.
A 7-loss Big Ten team beat the Big 12 co-champs.
Best conference in college football, and its champion is out.
Posted on 12/2/18 at 2:05 pm to DawgsLife
I Think the committee got it right and I also think OU will give Bama a good game. Their offense is legit and a shootout with a mobile and very athletic quarterback isn’t Bama’s strong suit. Bama wins but I don’t think it will be an overwhelming victory. Oh will put up enough points to make it a good game.
An argument can be made for UGA based on last night’s performance but the regular season ought to count for something and they were beaten handily by LSU.
Same goes for Ohio State. That loss at Purdue was too bad to ignore.
Both teams have a legit argument but neither is a shoo-in.
I think the big argument is how ND gets in with their schedule and UCF doesn’t.
An argument can be made for UGA based on last night’s performance but the regular season ought to count for something and they were beaten handily by LSU.
Same goes for Ohio State. That loss at Purdue was too bad to ignore.
Both teams have a legit argument but neither is a shoo-in.
I think the big argument is how ND gets in with their schedule and UCF doesn’t.
Posted on 12/2/18 at 2:08 pm to Lucky_Stryke
quote:
OU bout to get raped
Doubtful. I think it'll be a damn good game
Posted on 12/2/18 at 2:11 pm to BoarEd
LSU is playing UCF in the Fiesta Bowl...Just announced
Posted on 12/2/18 at 2:25 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Your logic sucks, or at least your application of it. You need to reword your argument because it doesn't say what you think it says.
You'd frick up a conversation with a fence post!...and I'm sure you think it's everybody else's fault. You'd be better served by going on back up north and finding a like-minded board to have a dialogue with.Posted on 12/2/18 at 2:29 pm to coachcrisp
quote:
coachcrisp
Well, if I needed additional evidence that I was correct, your disagreement confirms that I am.
Posted on 12/2/18 at 3:02 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
I don't even know what y'all are arguing about!...actually your post proves MINE to be accurate.Posted on 12/2/18 at 3:47 pm to WG_Dawg
Don’t you know by now that as long as UGA is out, they got it right according to Auburn. Hell, they thought they should have been in last year after getting trucked by UGA. But there was always 2010. Two full classes ago and with a different coach. When UGA finally gets a title in the next few years, Auburn posters won’t know what to do.
Posted on 12/2/18 at 3:50 pm to AirbusDawg
You’re saying Auburn fans thought they should’ve been in the playoff after the SEC championship game? Link?
Posted on 12/2/18 at 3:50 pm to AirbusDawg
quote:
Don’t you know by now that as long as UGA is out, they got it right according to Auburn. Hell, they thought they should have been in last year after getting trucked by UGA. But there was always 2010. Two full classes ago and with a different coach. When UGA finally gets a title in the next few years, Auburn posters won’t know what to do.
One of the most delusional posts I’ve seen
Page 4 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News